Quality of information in academic e-mailing lists

The article analyzes how researchers evaluate the quality of information in Internet e-mailing lists and whether the embeddedness of academic e-mailing lists in offline networks of a scientific community is related to it. The idea is that embeddedness gives researchers more opportunities to build up a reputation through contributing high-quality information to the group. Survey and archive data are used to test hypotheses about the effects of offline networks in 47 academic e-mailing lists used by a random sample of university researchers. Results indicate that the information in embedded online groups is regarded as more valuable than in purely virtual groups. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Alexander Rausch,et al.  Die schweigende Mehrheit — „Lurker“ in internetbasierten Diskussionsforen. , 2006 .

[2]  David F. Sally.  Conversation and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas , 1995 .

[3]  U. Matzat.  Social Networks and Cooperation in Electronic Communities: A Theoretical-Empirical Analysis of Academic Communication and Internet Discussion Groups , 2006 .

[4]  Brian K. Thorn,et al.  Discretionary Data Bases , 1987 .

[5]  S. Barab,et al.  Designing system dualities: Characterizing an online professional development community , 2004 .

[6]  S. Barab,et al.  Designing System Dualities: Characterizing a Web-Supported Professional Development Community , 2003 .

[7]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Computer Networks and Scientific Work , 1996 .

[8]  Ulrike Cress,et al.  Information Exchange With Shared Databases as a Social Dilemma , 2006, Commun. Res..

[9]  Bruce V. Lewenstein,et al.  Do Public Electronic Bulletin Boards Help Create Scientific Knowledge? , 1995 .

[10]  Uwe Matzat,et al.  Academic communication and Internet Discussion Groups: transfer of information or creation of social contacts? , 2004, Soc. Networks.

[11]  Joachim Weimann,et al.  The Effect of Communication Media on Cooperation , 2002 .

[12]  Uwe Matzat,et al.  Disciplinary differences in the use of internet discussion groups: differential communication needs or trust problems? , 2009, J. Inf. Sci..

[13]  B. Seely,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice , 1991 .

[14]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Connecting minds: Computer-mediated communication and scientific work , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[15]  Risto Lehtonen,et al.  Multilevel Statistical Models , 2005 .

[16]  E. Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier , 2000 .

[17]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  The Rhetorical Dynamics of Gender Harassment On-Line , 1999, Inf. Soc..

[18]  Herbert Snyder,et al.  The Network Nation: Human Communication Via Computer , 1995 .

[19]  Ronald G. Ragsdale,et al.  A Process Perspective on Participation in Scholarly Electronic Forums , 1997 .

[20]  B. Wellman,et al.  Netting Scholars , 2001 .

[21]  B. Wellman,et al.  Studying On-Line Social Networks , 1999 .

[22]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Work, Friendship, and Media Use for Information Exchange in a Networked Organization , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[23]  Reijo Savolainen,et al.  Field differences in the use and perceived usefulness of scholarly mailing lists , 2004, Inf. Res..

[24]  Teresa M. Harrison,et al.  Computer Networking and Scholarly Communication in the Twenty-First-Century University , 1996 .

[25]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  The Concept of Information Overload: A Review of Literature from Organization Science, Accounting, Marketing, MIS, and Related Disciplines , 2004, The Information Society.

[26]  Linda M. Harasim,et al.  Computer-Mediated Scholarly Collaboration , 1990 .

[27]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Communication networking in computer-conferencing systems: a longitudinal study of group roles and s , 1982 .

[28]  C. A. Perry,et al.  Scholarly Communication and Network Influences in the Hybrid Problem Area of Developmental Dyslexia. , 1996 .

[29]  Christopher M. Johnson,et al.  Communities of Practice , 2001 .

[30]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Group Support Systems: A Descriptive Evaluation of Case and Field Studies , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[31]  M. McLure Wasko,et al.  "It is what one does": why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Paul Solomon,et al.  Looking for Information—A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior , 2003, Information Retrieval.

[33]  U. Matzat.  The Embeddedness of Academic Online Groups in Offline Social Networks , 2009 .

[34]  Soo Young Rieh,et al.  Interaction on the Web: Scholars' Judgment of Information Quality and Cognitive Authority , 2000 .

[35]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Threaded Email Messages in Self-Organization and Science & Technology Studies Oriented Mailing Lists , 2004, Scientometrics.

[36]  WellmanBarry,et al.  Work, friendship, and media use for information exchange in a networked organization , 1998 .

[37]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[38]  R. Kling,et al.  Group Behavior and Learning in Electronic Forums: A Sociotechnical Approach , 2003 .

[39]  Roel Bosker,et al.  Multilevel analysis : an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling , 1999 .

[40]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Toward a “Critical Mass” Theory of Interactive Media , 1987 .

[41]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[42]  U. Matzat,et al.  The social embeddedness of academic online groups as a norm generating structure: A test of the Coleman model on norm emergence , 2004 .

[43]  Rob Kling,et al.  Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[44]  S. R. Hiltz.  Online communities , 1983 .

[45]  B. Wellman.  Computer Networks As Social Networks , 2001, Science.

[46]  Willard McCarty,et al.  HUMANIST: Lessons from a Global Electronic Seminar , 1992, Comput. Humanit..

[47]  P. W. Conner.  Networking in the humanities: Lessons from ANSAXNET , 1992 .

[48]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. , 1994, The Journal of applied psychology.

[49]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Network Nation: Human Communication Via Computer , 1979 .

[50]  W. Bowen,et al.  Impact on Research , 1984 .

[51]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Impact of research cultures on the use of digital library resources , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[52]  R. LaRose,et al.  Electronic Bulletin Boards and “Public Goods” Explanations of Collaborative Mass Media , 1993 .

[53]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Book Reviews : Online Communities: A Case Study of the Office of the Future , 1984 .

[54]  Joel Cohen,et al.  Computer mediated communication and publication productivity among faculty , 1996, Internet Res..

[55]  L. Freeman.  THE IMPACT OF COMPUTER BASED COMMUNICATION ON THE SOCIAL STRUCTURE OF AN EMERGING SCIENTIFIC SPECIALTY , 1984 .

[56]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  Email overload: exploring personal information management of email , 1996, CHI.

[57]  Ronald G. Ragsdale,et al.  Participation in electronic forums: implications for the design and implementation of collaborative distributed multimedia , 1997 .

[58]  Jens Riegelsberger,et al.  The researcher's dilemma: evaluating trust in computer-mediated communication , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[59]  Mark S. Schlager,et al.  Teacher Professional Development, Technology, and Communities of Practice: Are We Putting the Cart Before the Horse? , 2003 .

[60]  Jo W. Tombaugh,et al.  Evaluation of an International Scientific Computer‐Based Conference , 1984 .

[61]  Soo Young Rieh.  Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[62]  Leah A. Lievrouw,et al.  Triangulation as a research strategy for identifying invisible colleges among biomedical scientists , 1987 .

[63]  Réjean Landry,et al.  On the Determinants of Scientists' Collaboration , 1997 .

[64]  Jenny Fry,et al.  The intellectual and social organization of academic fields and the shaping of digital resources , 2007, J. Inf. Sci..

[65]  Brent D. Ruben,et al.  The Communication-Information Relationship in System-Theoretic Perspective , 1992, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..