Quantitative Stereovision in a Scanning Electron Microscope

Accurate, 3D full-field measurements at the micron-level are of interest in a wide range of applications, including both facilitation of mechanical experiments at reduced length scales and accurate profiling of specimen surfaces. Scanning electron microscope systems (SEMs) are a natural platform for acquiring high magnification images for stereo-reconstruction. In this work, an integrated methodology for accurate three-dimensional metric reconstruction and deformation measurements using single column SEM imaging systems is described. In these studies, the specimen stage is rotated in order to obtain stereo views of the specimen as it undergoes mechanical or thermal loading. Simulations and preliminary experimental studies at 300× demonstrate that (a) spatially-varying image distortions can be removed from images using a non-parametric distortion model, (b) the system can be reliably calibrated using distortion-corrected images of a planar object and grid at various orientations and (c) specimen rotation variability during the measurement phase can be controlled so that baseline strain errors are within the range of ±150 µε. Benchmark rigid body motion experiments using calibrated SEM views demonstrate that all components of strain in the reconstructed object have a mean value around O(10−4) and a random spatial distribution with standard deviation ≈ 300 micro-strain.

[1]  Michael A. Sutton,et al.  Metrology in a scanning electron microscope: theoretical developments and experimental validation , 2006 .

[2]  Ramesh C. Jain,et al.  Scanning electron microscope-based stereo analysis , 2005, Machine Vision and Applications.

[3]  William N. Sharpe,et al.  Microscale Characterization of Mechanical Properties , 2007 .

[4]  Jeffrey D. Helm,et al.  Improved three-dimensional image correlation for surface displacement measurement , 1996 .

[5]  David F. Maune Photogrammetric self-calibration of a scanning electron microscope / , 1976 .

[6]  M. Sutton,et al.  Systematic errors in digital image correlation due to undermatched subset shape functions , 2002 .

[7]  O. Faugeras Three-dimensional computer vision: a geometric viewpoint , 1993 .

[8]  J. L. Ladaga,et al.  Measuring Surface Topography with Scanning Electron Microscopy. I. EZEImage: A Program to Obtain 3D Surface Data , 2005, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[9]  G. Piazzesi Photogrammetry with the scanning electron microscope , 1973 .

[10]  M. Sutton,et al.  Scanning Electron Microscopy for Quantitative Small and Large Deformation Measurements Part II: Experimental Validation for Magnifications from 200 to 10,000 , 2007 .

[11]  Hugh Alan Bruck,et al.  Quantitative Error Assessment in Pattern Matching: Effects of Intensity Pattern Noise, Interpolation, Strain and Image Contrast on Motion Measurements , 2009 .

[12]  J. Embury,et al.  Digital image correlation studies for microscopic strain distribution and damage in dual phase steels , 2007 .

[13]  Anthony P. Reynolds,et al.  Use and Verification of Digital Image Correlation for Automated 3-D Surface Characterization in the Scanning Electron Microscope , 1999 .

[14]  M. A. Sutton,et al.  Systematic errors in digital image correlation caused by intensity interpolation , 2000 .

[15]  W. Sharpe Murray lecture tensile testing at the micrometer scale: Opportunities in experimental mechanics , 2003 .

[16]  S. Suresh,et al.  Cell and molecular mechanics of biological materials , 2003, Nature materials.

[17]  Ignazio Gallo,et al.  A vision‐based, 3D reconstruction technique for scanning electron microscopy: Direct comparison with atomic force microscopy , 2005, Microscopy research and technique.

[18]  I. Chasiotis Mechanics of thin films and microdevices , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability.

[19]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Geometric control of cell life and death. , 1997, Science.

[20]  John A. Pedersen,et al.  Mechanobiology in the Third Dimension , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  W. Sharpe Springer Handbook of Experimental Solid Mechanics , 2008 .

[22]  H. Bianco-Peled,et al.  Defining the role of matrix compliance and proteolysis in three-dimensional cell spreading and remodeling. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[23]  Michael A. Sutton,et al.  Scanning Electron Microscopy for Quantitative Small and Large Deformation Measurements Part I: SEM Imaging at Magnifications from 200 to 10,000 , 2007 .

[24]  Edward W. N. Bernroider,et al.  Three‐dimensional morphometry in scanning electron microscopy: a technique for accurate dimensional and angular measurements of microstructures using stereopaired digitized images and digital image analysis , 1999, Journal of microscopy.

[25]  Enrico Savio,et al.  Critical factors in SEM 3D stereo microscopy , 2008 .

[26]  Carles Cané,et al.  Digital image correlation of nanoscale deformation fields for local stress measurement in thin films , 2006 .

[27]  Hans Nørgaard Hansen,et al.  Investigation on the traceability of three dimensional scanning electron microscope measurements based on the stereo-pair technique , 2005 .

[28]  Andrew W. Fitzgibbon,et al.  Bundle Adjustment - A Modern Synthesis , 1999, Workshop on Vision Algorithms.

[29]  Michael T. Postek,et al.  Scanning electron microscope dimensional metrology using a model‐based library , 2005 .

[30]  Michael A. Sutton,et al.  Advances in light microscope stereo vision , 2004 .

[31]  P. Janmey,et al.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.