Exploring the cognitive infrastructure of communication

Human communication is often thought about in terms of transmitted messages in a conventional code like a language. But communication requires a specialized interactive intelligence. Senders have to be able to perform recipient design, while receivers need to be able to do intention recognition, knowing that recipient design has taken place. To study this interactive intelligence in the lab, we developed a new task that taps directly into the underlying abilities to communicate in the absence of a conventional code. We show that subjects are remarkably successful communicators under these conditions, especially when senders get feedback from receivers. Signaling is accomplished by the manner in which an instrumental action is performed, such that instrumentally dysfunctional components of an action are used to convey communicative intentions. The findings have important implications for the nature of the human communicative infrastructure, and the task opens up a line of experimentation on human communication.

[1]  S. Levinson,et al.  Roots of Human Sociality , 2006 .

[2]  Kensy Cooperrider Roots of human sociality: culture, cognition and interaction , 2009 .

[3]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[4]  S. Garrod,et al.  Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination , 1987, Cognition.

[5]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Contributing to Discourse , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  James P. Evans The Origin , 2009, Genetics in Medicine.

[8]  Ichiro Umata,et al.  Graphical Language Games: Interactional Constraints on Representational Form , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[9]  S. Brennan,et al.  Processes of Interactive Spoken Discourse: The Role of the Partner , 2003 .

[10]  E. Schegloff,et al.  Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction , 1979 .

[11]  J. D. Ruiter,et al.  On the origin of intentions , 2007 .

[12]  Louis Vuurpijl,et al.  SLOT: A research platform for investigating multimodal communication , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[13]  S. Moran,et al.  On the Origin , 2012 .

[14]  S. Levinson Interactional biases in human thinking , 1995 .

[15]  G. Csibra,et al.  Teleological reasoning in infancy: the naı̈ve theory of rational action , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Developmental psychology: Rational imitation in preverbal infants , 2002, Nature.

[17]  Siobhan Chapman Logic and Conversation , 2005 .

[18]  T. Wharton,et al.  Natural Pragmatics and Natural Codes , 2003 .

[19]  Jon Oberlander,et al.  Foundations of Representation: Where Might Graphical Symbol Systems Come From? , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[20]  Emanuel A. Schegloff,et al.  Presequences and indirection: Applying speech act theory to ordinary conversation , 1988 .

[21]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Understanding and sharing intentions , 2005 .

[22]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[23]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[24]  Michael Bader,et al.  The HCRC Map Task Corpus: A Natural Spoken Dialogue Corpus , 1993 .

[25]  Stephen C. Levinson,et al.  On the human ‘interactional engine’ , 2006 .

[26]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Referring as a collaborative process , 1986, Cognition.

[27]  Bruno Galantucci,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Emergence of Human Communication Systems , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[28]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Expressing generic concepts with and without a language model , 2005, Cognition.

[29]  N. J. Enfield,et al.  The definition of what-d'you-call-it: semantics and pragmatics of recognitional deixis , 2003 .

[30]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Naming and Describing in Social Communication , 1980 .

[31]  S. Kraemer Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Gregory Bateson , 1993, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[32]  L. Steels Experiments on the emergence of human communication , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  David Lewis Convention: A Philosophical Study , 1986 .