Theorizing on the Role of Individualism-Collectivism in Tacit Knowledge Transfer Between Agents in International Alliances

Taking insights from the extant literatures in cross-cultural management and organizational knowledge management, this paper explores the role of cultural dimensions of individualism and collectivism in transfer of tacit knowledge between foreign agents. Tacit knowledge transfer is positively influenced by four key factors: absorptive capacity of target unit, source unit's motivational disposition to share knowledge, cultural compatibility, and the extent of personal communication between foreign agents. It is proposed that the level of transfer of tactic knowledge between agents from collectivist cultures will be higher than the level of tacit knowledge transfer between agents from individualist cultures. It is also proposed that when there is cultural difference between foreign agents, the level of tacit knowledge transfer involving a source from a collectivist culture and a target from an individualist culture will be lower than transfer between an individualist source and a collectivist target. However, the proposed relationships are influenced by factors such as nature of knowledge, expectations of reciprocity, and the quality of interpersonal relationship between foreign agents. Several ideas for overcoming knowledge transfer obstacles and enhancing the effectiveness of knowledge transfer, as well as research implications of the proposed model are also discussed in detail.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[2]  Nicholas Athanassiou,et al.  Internationalization, Tacit Knowledge and the Top Management Teams of MNCs , 2000 .

[3]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[4]  David C. Coff,et al.  The Knowledge-Leveraging Paradox: How to Achieve Scale without Making Knowledge Imitable , 2006 .

[5]  M. Jakubik,et al.  Experiencing collaborative knowledge creation processes , 2008 .

[6]  E. C. Taylor,et al.  Mentoring in supervisor–subordinate dyads: Antecedents, consequences, and test of a mediation model of mentorship , 2009 .

[7]  K. Zhou,et al.  Relational mechanisms, formal contracts, and local knowledge acquisition by international subsidiaries , 2009 .

[8]  Melissa M. Appleyard,et al.  HOW DOES KNOWLEDGE FLOW? INTERFIRM PATTERNS IN THE SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY , 1996 .

[9]  W. Mitchell,et al.  Learning from competing partners: outcomes and durations of scale and link alliances in Europe, North America and Asia , 2000 .

[10]  David J. Teece,et al.  Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm , 1982 .

[11]  S. Winter.  Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets , 1987 .

[12]  R. Bhagat,et al.  Knowledge management in global organizations: Implications for international human resource management , 2002 .

[13]  A. Michaelson.  The development of a scientific specialty as diffusion through social relations: the case of role analysis , 1993 .

[14]  Donald P. Ballou,et al.  A Project Staffing Model to Enhance the Effectiveness of Knowledge Transfer in the Requirements Planning Phase for Multi-Project Environments , 2010, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[15]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[16]  B. Wellman,et al.  Work, friendship, and media use for information exchange in a networked organization , 1998 .

[17]  Sigal G. Barsade,et al.  Being Different Yet Feeling Similar: The Influence Of Demographic Composition And Organizational Culture On Work Processes And Outcomes , 1998 .

[18]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge flows within multinational corporations , 2000 .

[19]  H. Triandis,et al.  Cultural Variations in the Cross-Border Transfer of Organizational Knowledge: An Integrative Framework , 2002 .

[20]  Richard K. Wagner,et al.  Tacit knowledge in everyday intelligent behavior. , 1987 .

[21]  R. Grant,et al.  Knowledge and the firm: Overview , 1996 .

[22]  M. Polanyi.  Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[23]  Wei Li,et al.  Cultural influences on knowledge sharing through online communities of practice , 2006, J. Knowl. Manag..

[24]  Snejina Michailova,et al.  Facilitating knowledge sharing in Russian and Chinese subsidiaries: the role of personal networks and group membership , 2004, J. Knowl. Manag..

[25]  Venkataraman Ramesh,et al.  Enhancing Performance Through Knowledge Management: A Holistic Framework , 2005, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[26]  Cristina B. Gibson,et al.  Taking Stock in Our Progress on Individualism-Collectivism: 100 Years of Solidarity and Community , 1998 .

[27]  Eric W. K. Tsang.  Choice of International Technology Transfer Mode: A Resource-Based View , 1997 .

[28]  Wei Li,et al.  Impact of Chinese Culture Calues on Knowledge Sharing Through Online Communities of Practice , 2007, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[29]  L. Pereira,et al.  International Journal of Knowledge-Based Organizations , 2011 .

[30]  Wei Li.  Online Knowledge Sharing Among Chinese and American Employees: Explore the Influence of National Cultural Differences , 2009, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[31]  Gary P. Pisano,et al.  Learning How and Learning What: Effects of Tacit and Codified Knowledge on Performance Improvement Following Technology Adoption , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[32]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation , 1993 .

[33]  Shawn L. Berman,et al.  Tacit Knowledge as a Source of Competitive Advantage in the National Basketball Association , 2002 .

[34]  Murray E. Jennex.  Classifying Knowledge Management Systems Based on Context Content , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[35]  D. L. Gladstein.  Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .

[36]  Martha A. Gephart,et al.  Action Research: Building the Capacity for Learning and Change. (Overview) , 2003 .

[37]  Andrew C. Inkpen.  Learning and knowledge acquisition through international strategic alliances , 1998 .

[38]  Xin Li,et al.  Exploring the Extent and Impediments of Knowledge Sharing in Chinese Business Enterprise , 2010, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[39]  P. Earley,et al.  Structural Identity Theory and the Dynamics of Cross-Cultural Work Groups , 2002 .

[40]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[41]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[42]  Ben L. Kedia,et al.  Cultural Constraints on Transfer of Technology Across Nations: Implications for Research in International and Comparative Management , 1988 .

[43]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Perspective - Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[44]  Salah Hamza,et al.  Capturing Tacit Knowledge from Transient Workers: Improving the Organizational Competitiveness , 2009, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[45]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1991 .

[46]  Joanna L. Y. Ho,et al.  The Openness of Knowledge Sharing within Organizations: A Comparative Study of the United States and the People's Republic of China , 2000 .

[47]  G. Hamel.  Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .

[48]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Information processing in traditional, hybrid, and virtual teams: From nascent knowledge to transactive memory , 1999 .

[49]  Kelly J. Fadel,et al.  Information Influence in Mediated Knowledge Transfer: An Experimental Test of Elaboration Likelihood , 2009, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[50]  Hannu Kivijärvi,et al.  Sustaining Organizational Innovativeness: Advancing Knowledge Sharing During the Scenario Process , 2010, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[51]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[52]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  A Model of Knowledge Management Success , 2006, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[53]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[54]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Multilevel knowledge and team performance , 2009 .

[55]  Charles C. Snow,et al.  When Groups Consist of Multiple Nationalities: Towards a New Understanding of the Implications , 1998 .

[56]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[57]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[58]  Harry G. Barkema,et al.  Working abroad, working with others: How firms learn to operate international joint ventures , 1997 .

[59]  K. Hutchings,et al.  National Cultural Influences on Knowledge Sharing: A Comparison of China and Russia , 2006 .

[60]  Johann H. Schlichter,et al.  Context-Aware Creativity Support for Corporate Open Innovation , 2012, Int. J. Knowl. Based Organ..

[61]  Omar E. M. Khalil,et al.  Culture and Knowledge Transfer Capacity: A Cross-National Study , 2010, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[62]  Lars Huemer,et al.  Trustworthiness, Risk, and the Transfer of Tacit and Explicit Knowledge between Alliance Partners , 2008 .

[63]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures , 2001 .

[64]  D. Wegner,et al.  Transactive memory in close relationships. , 1991 .

[65]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Knowledge acquisition from foreign parents in international joint ventures: an empirical examination in the Hungarian context , 1996 .

[66]  Hazel Taylor.  Tacit Knowledge: Conceptualizations and Operationalizations , 2007, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[67]  H. Triandis.  Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. , 1989, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.