Locomotion Enhances Neural Encoding of Visual Stimuli in Mouse V1

Neurons in mouse primary visual cortex (V1) are selective for particular properties of visual stimuli. Locomotion causes a change in cortical state that leaves their selectivity unchanged but strengthens their responses. Both locomotion and the change in cortical state are thought to be initiated by projections from the mesencephalic locomotor region, the latter through a disinhibitory circuit in V1. By recording simultaneously from a large number of single neurons in alert mice viewing moving gratings, we investigated the relationship between locomotion and the information contained within the neural population. We found that locomotion improved encoding of visual stimuli in V1 by two mechanisms. First, locomotion-induced increases in firing rates enhanced the mutual information between visual stimuli and single neuron responses over a fixed window of time. Second, stimulus discriminability was improved, even for fixed population firing rates, because of a decrease in noise correlations across the population. These two mechanisms contributed differently to improvements in discriminability across cortical layers, with changes in firing rates most important in the upper layers and changes in noise correlations most important in layer V. Together, these changes resulted in a threefold to fivefold reduction in the time needed to precisely encode grating direction and orientation. These results support the hypothesis that cortical state shifts during locomotion to accommodate an increased load on the visual system when mice are moving. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This paper contains three novel findings about the representation of information in neurons within the primary visual cortex of the mouse. First, we show that locomotion reduces by at least a factor of 3 the time needed for information to accumulate in the visual cortex that allows the distinction of different visual stimuli. Second, we show that the effect of locomotion is to increase information in cells of all layers of the visual cortex. Third, we show that the means by which information is enhanced by locomotion differs between the upper layers, where the major effect is the increasing of firing rates, and in layer V, where the major effect is the reduction in noise correlations.

[1]  George H. Denfield,et al.  Pupil Fluctuations Track Fast Switching of Cortical States during Quiet Wakefulness , 2014, Neuron.

[2]  Kenneth D Harris,et al.  Inhibitory control of correlated intrinsic variability in cortical networks , 2016, bioRxiv.

[3]  S. Hestrin,et al.  Subthreshold Mechanisms Underlying State-Dependent Modulation of Visual Responses , 2013, Neuron.

[4]  M. Scanziani,et al.  Inhibition of Inhibition in Visual Cortex: The Logic of Connections Between Molecularly Distinct Interneurons , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  M. Stryker,et al.  Identification of a Brainstem Circuit Regulating Visual Cortical State in Parallel with Locomotion , 2014, Neuron.

[6]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Attention improves performance primarily by reducing interneuronal correlations , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  Dario L Ringach,et al.  Enhanced Spatial Resolution During Locomotion and Heightened Attention in Mouse Primary Visual Cortex , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Jan Drugowitsch,et al.  Multiplicative and Additive Modulation of Neuronal Tuning with Population Activity Affects Encoded Information , 2016, Neuron.

[9]  Jessica A. Cardin,et al.  Waking State: Rapid Variations Modulate Neural and Behavioral Responses , 2015, Neuron.

[10]  Jochen F. Staiger,et al.  Characterizing VIP Neurons in the Barrel Cortex of VIPcre/tdTomato Mice Reveals Layer-Specific Differences , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  Sander W. Keemink,et al.  Behavioral-state modulation of inhibition is context-dependent and cell type specific in mouse visual cortex , 2016, eLife.

[12]  Douglas A Ruff,et al.  Attention can increase or decrease spike count correlations between pairs of neurons depending on their role in a task , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  J. Coyle,et al.  Cholinergic innervation of mouse forebrain structures , 1994, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  M. Carandini,et al.  Integration of visual motion and locomotion in mouse visual cortex , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  Daniel A Butts,et al.  How much information is associated with a particular stimulus? , 2003, Network.

[16]  A.M. Litke,et al.  What does the eye tell the brain?: Development of a system for the large scale recording of retinal output activity , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[17]  Mriganka Sur,et al.  An acetylcholine-activated microcircuit drives temporal dynamics of cortical activity , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  M. L. Shik,et al.  [Control of walking and running by means of electric stimulation of the midbrain]. , 1966, Biofizika.

[19]  Michael J. Goard,et al.  Basal Forebrain Activation Enhances Cortical Coding of Natural Scenes , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  Georg B. Keller,et al.  Sensorimotor Mismatch Signals in Primary Visual Cortex of the Behaving Mouse , 2012, Neuron.

[21]  P. Golshani,et al.  Cellular mechanisms of brain-state-dependent gain modulation in visual cortex , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  Michael J. Goard,et al.  Fast Modulation of Visual Perception by Basal Forebrain Cholinergic Neurons , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  Ovidiu F. Jurjuţ,et al.  Effects of Locomotion Extend throughout the Mouse Early Visual System , 2014, Current Biology.

[24]  U. Mitzdorf Current source-density method and application in cat cerebral cortex: investigation of evoked potentials and EEG phenomena. , 1985, Physiological reviews.

[25]  K. Harris,et al.  Cortical state and attention , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[26]  Alexander S. Ecker,et al.  Decorrelated Neuronal Firing in Cortical Microcircuits , 2010, Science.

[27]  Maneesh Sahani,et al.  Inhibitory control of correlated intrinsic variability in cortical networks , 2016 .

[28]  Lee E Miller,et al.  Responses of somatosensory area 2 neurons to actively and passively generated limb movements. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  M. Stryker,et al.  A Cortical Circuit for Gain Control by Behavioral State , 2014, Cell.

[30]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[31]  G. Fishell,et al.  The Largest Group of Superficial Neocortical GABAergic Interneurons Expresses Ionotropic Serotonin Receptors , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[33]  A. Pouget,et al.  Neural correlations, population coding and computation , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[34]  A. Pouget,et al.  Information-limiting correlations , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  Ian R. Wickersham,et al.  The Stimulus Selectivity and Connectivity of Layer Six Principal Cells Reveals Cortical Microcircuits Underlying Visual Processing , 2014, Neuron.

[36]  M. Carandini,et al.  Vision and Locomotion Shape the Interactions between Neuron Types in Mouse Visual Cortex , 2016, Neuron.

[37]  M. Carandini,et al.  Locomotion Controls Spatial Integration in Mouse Visual Cortex , 2013, Current Biology.

[38]  Walle J. H. Nauta,et al.  Some ascending pathways in the brain stem reticular formation. , 1958 .

[39]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[40]  Shik Ml,et al.  Control of walking and running by means of electric stimulation of the midbrain , 1966 .

[41]  Jiangang Du,et al.  Multiplexed, High Density Electrophysiology with Nanofabricated Neural Probes , 2011, PloS one.

[42]  M. Stryker,et al.  Modulation of Visual Responses by Behavioral State in Mouse Visual Cortex , 2010, Neuron.

[43]  Martin Vinck,et al.  Arousal and Locomotion Make Distinct Contributions to Cortical Activity Patterns and Visual Encoding , 2014, Neuron.

[44]  R. Shapley,et al.  Suppression of neural responses to nonoptimal stimuli correlates with tuning selectivity in macaque V1. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Partitioning neuronal variability , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.