Reinventing Forgiveness: A Formal Investigation of Moral Facilitation

Reputation mechanisms have responded to the ever-increasing demand for online policing by “collecting, distributing and aggregating feedback about participants' past behavior”. But unlike in human societies where forbidden actions are coupled with legal repercussions, reputation systems fulfill a socially-oriented duty by alerting the community's members on one's good standing. The decision to engage in collaborative efforts with another member is chiefly placed in the hands of each individual. This form of people empowerment sans litigation brings forth a moral concern: in humanhuman interactions, a violation of norms and standards is unavoidable but not unforgivable. Driven by the prosocial benefits of forgiveness, this paper proposes ways of facilitating forgiveness between offender and victim through the use of personal ‘moral' agents. We suggest that a richer mechanism for regulating online behaviour can be developed, one that integrates trust, reputation and forgiveness.

[1]  E. Friedman,et al.  The Social Cost of Cheap Pseudonyms , 2001 .

[2]  Paul Resnick,et al.  Reputation systems , 2000, CACM.

[3]  Helen Block Lewis,et al.  The Role of Shame in Symptom Formation , 1988 .

[4]  G. A. Mendelsohn,et al.  Emotional responses to affective displays in others: The distinction between empathy and sympathy. , 1986 .

[5]  Peter C. Hill,et al.  Forgiveness and Justice: A Research Agenda for Social and Personality Psychology , 2003, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[6]  Lorne M. Sulsky,et al.  Attributions of blame and forgiveness in romantic relationships: A policy-capturing study. , 1997 .

[7]  J. Mahalik,et al.  Gender Role Stress in Relation to Shame, Guilt, and Externalization , 2001 .

[8]  Thomas J. Scheff,et al.  The shame-rage spiral: A case study of an interminable quarrel. , 1987 .

[9]  Michael E. McCullough,et al.  Forgiveness: Who Does It and How Do They Do It? , 2001 .

[10]  Steven J. Sandage,et al.  Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Rowland S. Miller Empathic Embarrassment: Situational and Personal Determinants of Reactions to the Embarrassment of Another , 1987 .

[12]  E. Worthington,et al.  Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  D. K. Marcus,et al.  Are Perceptions of Emotion in the Eye of the Beholder? A Social Relations Analysis of Judgments of Embarrassment , 1996 .

[14]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[15]  Alexander Artikis,et al.  Socio-Cognitive Grids : A Partial ALFEBIITE Perspective , 2003 .

[16]  Deborah G. Johnson Ethics online , 1997 .

[17]  Deborah G. Johnson,et al.  Ethics Online: Shaping Social Behavior Online Takes More THan New Laws and Modified Edicts , 1997, Commun. ACM.

[18]  Gün R. Semin,et al.  Social transgressions, social perspectives, and social emotionality , 1981 .

[19]  D. Keltner,et al.  Embarrassment: its distinct form and appeasement functions. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  Brad R. C. Kelln,et al.  An Equity Theory Analysis of the Impact of Forgiveness and Retribution on Transgressor Compliance , 1999 .

[21]  A. Buss Self-consciousness and social anxiety , 1980 .

[22]  M. R. Holmgren Forgiveness and the intrinsic value of persons , 1993 .