Determination of Field Effects of Contaminants—Significance of Pollution-Induced Community Tolerance

The concept of pollution-induced community tolerance (PICT) consists of the phenomenon that communities in an ecosystem exhibit increased tolerance as a result of exposure to contaminants. Although a range of ‘classic’ ecological principles explains the processes that increase tolerance of a community, the value of PICT for ecological risk assessment was recognized only recently (Blanck et al. 1988). The following issues are recognized: First, regarding the question on the role of suspect compounds causing ecological effects, the PICT approach covers the issue of causality better than ‘classical’ ecological community response parameters like species densities or species diversity indices. This relates to the fact that the level of PICT is assumed to be relatively constant (compared to density and diversity), whereas the suspect compound causing the observed effect can be deduced with relative clear inference from artificial exposure experiments. Second, PICT directly addresses a level of biological organization (the community), the level of concern for many ecological risk assessment methods. Other methods for risk assessment, like toxicity testing or bioassays, focus on individual or population-level effects, and need extrapolation of the results to the field. Such extrapolation step may pose problems regarding validity of the outcome of risk assessment. The occurrence of PICT is, however, not (yet) a community endpoint that is sufficiently underpinned to trigger risk mitigation activities. This paper especially focuses on the possibility to improve risk assessment approaches by incorporation of PICT assessments, especially focusing on the issue of causality and on the ecological meaning of PICT. Despite the advantages over ‘classical’ parameters, literature analysis suggests that the PICT approach may be strengthened by determining to which degree the PICT approach relates to ecological changes, like shifts in community structure, functioning, and stability. The aim of this paper is to summarize some literature, putting the emphasis on terrestrial studies, to get insights whether PICT is a sensitive and powerful tool to quantify ecological effects in field conditions, to link them to toxicant stress, and thus to determine whether PICT may be taken into consideration in risk assessment.

[1]  M. Timmermans,et al.  Genetic Variation in Toxicant-Stressed Populations: An Evaluation of the “Genetic Erosion” Hypothesis , 2002 .

[2]  L. Posthuma,et al.  Effects of Zinc Contamination on a Natural Nematode Community in Outdoor Soil Mesocosms , 2002, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[3]  T. Aldenberg,et al.  The relation between extrapolated risk, expressed as potentially affected fraction, and community effects, expressed as pollution‐induced community tolerance , 2001, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[4]  E. Bååth,et al.  Response of soil bacterial communities pre-exposed to different metals and reinoculated in an unpolluted soil , 2001 .

[5]  H. G. Geest,et al.  Mixture toxicity of copper and diazinon to larvae of the mayfly (Ephoron virgo) judging additivity at different effect levels. , 2000 .

[6]  S. Siciliano,et al.  Assessment of 2,4,6‐trinitrotoluene toxicity in field soils by pollution‐induced community tolerance, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, and seed germination assay , 2000 .

[7]  D. Groenendijk,et al.  Linking ecological and ecotoxicological techniques to support river rehabilitation. , 2000, Chemosphere.

[8]  Rebecca A. Efroymson,et al.  Ecological Risk Assessment for Contaminated Sites , 2000 .

[9]  A. Grant,et al.  Pollution‐induced tolerance to copper of nematode communities in the severely contaminated restronguet creek and adjacent estuaries, Cornwall, United Kingdom , 2000 .

[10]  F. Stuer-Lauridsen,et al.  Pollution-Induced Community Tolerance (PICT) in coastal phytoplankton communities exposure to copper , 1999, Hydrobiologia.

[11]  J. Kelly,et al.  Changes in soil microbial communities over time resulting from one time application of zinc: a laboratory microcosm study , 1999 .

[12]  G. Suter,et al.  Finding a Niche for Soil Microbial Toxicity Tests in Ecological Risk Assessment , 1999 .

[13]  A. Breure,et al.  Risk Assessment, Microbial Communities, and Pollution-Induced Community Tolerance , 1999 .

[14]  D. Groenendijk,et al.  Efficient shedding of accumulated metals during metamorphosis in metal‐adapted populations of the midge Chironomus riparius , 1999 .

[15]  W. Admiraal,et al.  Induced Metal Tolerance in Microbenthic Communities from Three Lowland Rivers with Different Metal Loads , 1999, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[16]  Olivier Klepper,et al.  Estimating the Effect on Soil Organisms of Exceeding No-Observed Effect Concentrations (NOECs) of Persistent Toxicants , 1999 .

[17]  L. Posthuma,et al.  Rapid method for assessing pollution‐induced community tolerance in contaminated soil , 1998 .

[18]  Tom Aldenberg,et al.  A food web model for fate and direct and indirect effects of Dursban® 4E (active ingredient chlorpyrifos) in freshwater microcosms , 1998, Aquatic Ecology.

[19]  Eco,et al.  Validation of toxicity data and risk limits for soils:final report , 1998 .

[20]  Wellesley Site,et al.  Ecological risk assessment , 1998 .

[21]  J. Kelly,et al.  Effects of heavy metal contamination and remediation on soil microbial communities in the vicinity of a zinc smelter , 1998 .

[22]  Shahid Naeem,et al.  Species Redundancy and Ecosystem Reliability , 1998 .

[23]  E. Bååth,et al.  Effect of Metal-Rich Sludge Amendments on the Soil Microbial Community , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[24]  E. Smit,et al.  Detection of shifts in microbial community structure and diversity in soil caused by copper contamination using amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis , 1997 .

[25]  E. Bååth,et al.  Development of metal tolerance in soil bacterial communities exposed to experimentally increased metal levels , 1996, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[26]  J. Kammenga,et al.  Long-term effects of copper and pH on the nematode community in an agroecosystem. , 1996 .

[27]  A. Grant,et al.  Assessing the impact of copper on nematode communities from a chronically metal-enriched estuary using pollution-induced community tolerance , 1995 .

[28]  P. Armitage,et al.  The Chironomidae: the biology and ecology of non-biting midges. , 1995 .

[29]  M. Michels,et al.  Effects of heavy metals in soil on microbial diversity and activity as shown by the sensitivity-resistance index, an ecologically relevant parameter , 1994, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[30]  R. Warwick,et al.  Soft sediment meiofaunal community structure in relation to a long-term heavy metal gradient in the Fal estuary system , 1994 .

[31]  L. Posthuma,et al.  Heavy-metal adaptation in terrestrial invertebrates: a review of occurrence, genetics, physiology and ecological consequences , 1993 .

[32]  Leo Posthuma,et al.  GENETIC VARIATION AND COVARIATION FOR CHARACTERISTICS ASSOCIATED WITH CADMIUM TOLERANCE IN NATURAL POPULATIONS OF THE SPRINGTAIL ORCHESELLA CINCTA (L.) , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[33]  M. Sjöström,et al.  Combined effects of tri-n-butyl tin (TBT) and diuron on marine periphyton communities detected as pollution-induced community tolerance , 1992 .

[34]  G A Fox,et al.  Practical causal inference for ecoepidemiologists. , 1991, Journal of toxicology and environmental health.

[35]  L. Posthuma Genetic differentiation between populations of Orchesella cincta (Collembola) from heavy metal contaminated sites. , 1990 .

[36]  E. Bååth Effects of heavy metals in soil on microbial processes and populations (a review) , 1989 .

[37]  Peter M. Chapman,et al.  Sediment quality criteria from the sediment quality triad: An example , 1986 .

[38]  Peter M. Chapman,et al.  A Sediment Quality Triad: Measures of sediment contamination, toxicity and infaunal community composition in Puget Sound , 1985 .

[39]  S. Loppi,et al.  Biodiversity of epiphytic lichens and air pollution in the town of Siena (central Italy). , 2002, Environmental pollution.

[40]  T. Caquet,et al.  Mesocosms in ecotoxicology (1): Outdoor aquatic systems. , 2000, Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[41]  H.J.P. Eijsackers,et al.  Site-specific ecological risks: a basic approach to function-specific assessment of soil pollution , 2000 .

[42]  Frank A. Swartjes,et al.  Risk-Based Assessment of Soil and Groundwater Quality in the Netherlands: Standards and Remediation Urgency , 1999, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[43]  C. Braak,et al.  Ordination of responses to toxic stress in experimental ecosystems , 1998 .

[44]  C. A. V. van Gestel,et al.  Development of zinc bioavailability and toxicity for the springtail Folsomia candida in an experimentally contaminated field plot. , 1997, Environmental pollution.

[45]  H. Mooney,et al.  Ecosystem Function of Biodiversity: A Summary , 1994 .

[46]  W. Bund Food web relations of littoral macro- and meiobenthos. , 1994 .

[47]  K. Giller,et al.  Absence of nitrogen fixation in clover grown on soil subject to long-term contamination with heavy metals is due to survival of only ineffective Rhizobium , 1989 .

[48]  H. Blanck,et al.  Pollution-Induced Community Tolerance—A New Ecotoxicological Tool , 1988 .

[49]  H. Eijsackers,et al.  Effect of earthworms on grassland on recently reclaimed polder soils in the Netherlands , 1983 .

[50]  M. DõÂaz-RavinÄaa,et al.  Response of soil bacterial communities pre-exposed to different metals and reinoculated in an unpolluted soil , 2022 .