Prospective study of external cephalic version in Glasgow: patient selection, outcome and factors associated with outcome.

Data were collected prospectively on all 67 women who underwent an attempt at external cephalic version (ECV) over 1 year in the four Glasgow maternity hospitals. Ultrasonography was used in all women. However, tocolytics were used in only two (6%) nulliparous women despite published evidence of their efficacy. Only 25 (37%) women undergoing ECV had a free presenting part which is known to be associated with success. Seventeen (25%) women were less than 37 weeks pregnant despite spontaneous version being common at this stage. ECV was successful in only 26 (39%) women and only 18 (27%) had a vaginal cephalic delivery. These results compare unfavourably with published results of around two-thirds for both end-points. Although publication bias is likely, patient selection, under-usage of tocolytics and lack of experience may also be factors. Consideration should be given to a reduced number of operators who can maximise their throughput and expertise.

[1]  J. Pell,et al.  Variations in the Management of Singleton Breech Presentation Throughout Scotland , 1998, Scottish medical journal.

[2]  G. Wendel,et al.  A Randomized Placebo‐Controlled Evaluation of Terbutaline for External Cephalic Version , 1997, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  D. Theriault,et al.  Does the use of a tocolytic agent affect the success rate of external cephalic version? , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  T. Chung,et al.  A randomized, double blind, controlled trial of tocolysis to assist external cephalic version in late pregnancy , 1996, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[5]  W. Scorza.  Intrapartum management of breech presentation. , 1996, Clinics in perinatology.

[6]  Z. Hagay,et al.  The impact of external cephalic version on the rate of vaginal and cesarean breech deliveries: a 3-year cumulative experience. , 1995, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[7]  M. Hod,et al.  External cephalic version at term using broad criteria: effect on mode of delivery. , 1995, Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology.

[8]  J. Fortney,et al.  Efficacy of external cephalic version: A review , 1993, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  J. Kopelman,et al.  External Cephalic Version at Term: Is a Tocolytic Necessary? , 1987, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  G. Hofmeyr.  Effect of external cephalic version in late pregnancy on breech presentation and caesarean section rate: a controlled trial , 1983, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[11]  J. E. Green,et al.  Has an increased cesarean section rate for term breech delivery reduced in incidence of birth asphyxia, trauma, and death? , 1982, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.