The impact of returns policies on profitability: A fashion e-commerce case

Research on returns policies is scarce and inconclusive. This study is a first attempt to empirically analyze and describe the effects of returns policies on consumer behavior and the moderating effects of the policies on profitability. The method involves analyzing the transactional data of a Swedish online fashion retailer. The results of the regression analyses show that with a lenient returns policy, repeat customers generate a significantly higher contribution per order, while returners and customers who enjoy free returns generate a significantly lower contribution per order. In addition, returners and repeat customers generate a significantly higher total contribution, while customers who enjoy free returns generate a significantly lower total contribution. Hence, returns policies that are free of charge do not necessarily benefit retailers in terms of long-term profitability. From a managerial perspective, the results provide guidance on how to address the recent changes in European consumer legislation.

[1]  Stanley E. Griffis,et al.  The customer consequences of returns in online retailing: An empirical analysis , 2012 .

[2]  Blanca Hernández,et al.  Customer behavior in electronic commerce: The moderating effect of e-purchasing experience , 2010 .

[3]  Holly A. Syrdal,et al.  The Effect of Return Policy Leniency on Consumer Purchase and Return Decisions: A Meta-analytic Review , 2016 .

[4]  J. Chen,et al.  Competing in a supply chain via full-refund and no-refund customer returns policies , 2013 .

[5]  James G. Maxham,et al.  Return Shipping Policies of Online Retailers: Normative Assumptions and the Long-Term Consequences of Fee and Free Returns , 2012 .

[6]  B. Wansink,et al.  How Retailers’ Recommendation and Return Policies Alter Product Evaluations , 2012 .

[7]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  Managing electronic commerce retail transaction costs for customer value , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[8]  Samar K. Mukhopadhyay,et al.  A dynamic model for optimal design quality and return policies , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Stacy L. Wood.  Remote Purchase Environments: The Influence of Return Policy Leniency on Two-Stage Decision Processes , 2001 .

[10]  O. Williamson.  Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations , 1979, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[11]  Ronald S. Tibben-Lembke,et al.  Going Backwards: Reverse Logistics Trends and Practices , 1999 .

[12]  Zhi Pei,et al.  E-tailer׳s return policy, consumer׳s perception of return policy fairness and purchase intention , 2014 .

[13]  Dag Ericsson,et al.  Customer segmentation based on buying and returning behaviour , 2013 .

[14]  Ruiliang Yan,et al.  Product categories, returns policy and pricing strategy for e‐marketers , 2009 .

[15]  K. Hjort,et al.  (R)e‐tail borrowing of party dresses: an experimental study , 2012 .

[16]  Björn Lantz,et al.  Real e-customer behavioural responses to free delivery and free returns , 2013, Electron. Commer. Res..

[17]  Kenneth D. Bahn,et al.  Information and its impact on consumers׳ reactions to restrictive return policies , 2014 .

[18]  Randall L. Schultz,et al.  Product Returns on the Internet: A Case of Mixed Signals? , 2010 .