Precise Orbit and Clock Products of Galileo, BDS and QZSS from MGEX Since 2018: Comparison and PPP Validation

In recent years, the development of new constellations including Galileo, BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS) and Quasi-Zenith Satellite System (QZSS) have undergone dramatic changes. Since January 2018, about 30 satellites of the new constellations have been launched and most of the new satellites have been included in the precise orbit and clock products provided by the Multi Global Navigation Satellite System (Multi-GNSS) Experiment (MGEX). Meanwhile, critical issues including antenna parameters, yaw-attitude models and solar radiation pressure models have been continuously refined for these new constellations and updated into precise MGEX orbit determination and precise clock estimation solutions. In this context, MGEX products since 2018 are herein assessed by orbit and clock comparisons among individual analysis centers (ACs), satellite laser ranging (SLR) validation and precise point positioning (PPP) solutions. Orbit comparisons showed 3D agreements of 3–5 cm for Galileo, 8–9 cm for BDS-2 inclined geosynchronous orbit (IGSO), 12–18 cm for BDS-2 medium earth orbit (MEO) satellites, 24 cm for BDS-3 MEO and 11–16 cm for QZSS IGSO satellites. SLR validations demonstrated an orbit accuracy of about 3–4 cm for Galileo and BDS-2 MEO, 5–6 cm for BDS-2 IGSO, 4–6 cm for BDS-3 MEO and 5–10 cm for QZSS IGSO satellites. Clock products from different ACs generally had a consistency of 0.1–0.3 ns for Galileo, 0.2–0.5 ns for BDS IGSO/MEO and 0.2–0.4 ns for QZSS satellites. The positioning errors of kinematic PPP in Galileo-only mode were about 17–19 mm in the north, 13–16 mm in the east and 74–81 mm in the up direction, respectively. As for BDS-only PPP, positioning accuracies of about 14, 14 and 49 mm could be achieved in kinematic mode with products from Wuhan University applied.

[1]  G. Beutler,et al.  A New Solar Radiation Pressure Model for GPS Satellites , 1999, GPS Solutions.

[2]  Michael R Pearlman,et al.  THE INTERNATIONAL LASER RANGING SERVICE , 2007 .

[3]  Vincenza Luceri,et al.  Creation of the new industry-standard space test of laser retroreflectors for the gnss , 2011 .

[4]  Rolf Dach,et al.  Activities at the CODE Analysis Center , 2012 .

[5]  Oliver Montenbruck,et al.  The IGS MGEX Experiment as a Milestone for a Comprehensive Multi-GNSS Service , 2013 .

[6]  O. Montenbruck,et al.  IGS-MGEX: Preparing the Ground for Multi-Constellation GNSS Science , 2013 .

[7]  R. Dach,et al.  CODE’s new solar radiation pressure model for GNSS orbit determination , 2015, Journal of Geodesy.

[8]  Qile Zhao,et al.  Precise orbit determination for quad-constellation satellites at Wuhan University: strategy, result validation, and comparison , 2016, Journal of Geodesy.

[9]  K. Moffett,et al.  Remote Sens , 2015 .

[10]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  Galileo Orbit and Clock Quality of the IGS Multi-GNSS Experiment , 2015 .

[11]  Maik Uhlemann,et al.  GFZ Global Multi-GNSS Network and Data Processing Results , 2015 .

[12]  P. Steigenberger,et al.  Satellite laser ranging to GPS and GLONASS , 2015, Journal of Geodesy.

[13]  Rolf Dach,et al.  CODE’s five-system orbit and clock solution—the challenges of multi-GNSS data analysis , 2017, Journal of Geodesy.

[14]  Jinling Wang,et al.  Assessment of precise orbit and clock products for Galileo, BeiDou, and QZSS from IGS Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) , 2016, GPS Solutions.

[15]  Jing Guo,et al.  Comparison of solar radiation pressure models for BDS IGSO and MEO satellites with emphasis on improving orbit quality , 2017, GPS Solutions.

[16]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  Semi-analytical solar radiation pressure modeling for QZS-1 orbit-normal and yaw-steering attitude , 2017 .

[17]  Qile Zhao,et al.  Precise orbit and clock determination for BeiDou-3 experimental satellites with yaw attitude analysis , 2017, GPS Solutions.

[18]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  The Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) of the International GNSS Service (IGS) - Achievements, prospects and challenges , 2017 .

[19]  Qile Zhao,et al.  An a priori solar radiation pressure model for the QZSS Michibiki satellite , 2018, Journal of Geodesy.

[20]  Qile Zhao,et al.  Yaw attitude modeling for BeiDou I06 and BeiDou-3 satellites , 2018, GPS Solutions.

[21]  Qile Zhao,et al.  Empirically derived model of solar radiation pressure for BeiDou GEO satellites , 2018, Journal of Geodesy.

[22]  R. Dach,et al.  An Empirical SRP Model for the Orbit Normal Mode , 2018 .

[23]  Xin Li,et al.  Precise orbit determination for BDS3 experimental satellites using iGMAS and MGEX tracking networks , 2018, Journal of Geodesy.

[24]  Guanwen Huang,et al.  Estimation of antenna phase center offset for BDS IGSO and MEO satellites , 2018, GPS Solutions.

[25]  Rolf Dach,et al.  International GNSS Service: Technical Report 2018 , 2019 .

[26]  Urs Hugentobler,et al.  The adjusted optical properties for Galileo/BeiDou-2/QZS-1 satellites and initial results on BeiDou-3e and QZS-2 satellites , 2019, Advances in Space Research.

[27]  Krzysztof Sośnica,et al.  Improving Galileo orbit determination using zero-difference ambiguity fixing in a Multi-GNSS processing , 2019 .

[28]  Harald Schuh,et al.  Influence of stochastic modeling for inter-system biases on multi-GNSS undifferenced and uncombined precise point positioning , 2019, GPS Solutions.

[29]  Keke Zhang,et al.  Galileo and QZSS precise orbit and clock determination using new satellite metadata , 2019, Journal of Geodesy.