PET Calibration, Acceptance Testing, and Quality Control

PET/CT is a routinely performed diagnostic imaging procedure. To ensure that the system is performing properly and produces images of best possible quality and quantitative accuracy, a comprehensive quality control (QC) program should be implemented. This should include a rigorous initial acceptance test of the system, performed at the time of installation. This will ensure the system performs to the manufacturer’s specifications and also serves as a reference point to which subsequent tests can be compared to as the system ages. Once in clinical use, the system should be tested on a routine basis to ensure that the system is fully operational and provides consistent image quality. To implement a successful and effective QC program, it is important to a have an understanding of the basic imaging components of the system. This chapter will describe the basic system components of a PET system and the dataflow that will aid a user in identifying potential problems. Acceptance tests and QC procedures will also be described and explained, all designed to ensure that a consistent image quality and quantitative accuracy are maintained. As will be discussed, an effective QC program can be implemented with a few relatively simple routinely performed tests.

[1]  W. F. Jones,et al.  A Real Time Digital Coincidence Processor for Positron Emission Tomography , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[2]  J. Czernin,et al.  Comparison of noise equivalent count rates and image noise , 2005 .

[3]  M. Daube-Witherspoon,et al.  Treatment of axial data in three-dimensional PET. , 1987, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  Tim Mulnix,et al.  PET performance measurements for an LSO-based combined PET/CT scanner using the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2-2001 standard. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  Joos V Lebesque,et al.  Standardised FDG uptake: a prognostic factor for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer. , 2005, European journal of cancer.

[6]  Sung-Cheng Huang,et al.  Anatomy of SUV , 2000 .

[7]  P K Marsden,et al.  Developments in component-based normalization for 3D PET. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  C. Melcher,et al.  Cerium-doped lutetium oxyorthosilicate: a fast, efficient new scintillator , 1991, Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[9]  Magnus Dahlbom,et al.  Implementation of true continuous bed motion in 2-D and 3-D whole-body PET scanning , 2001 .

[10]  Wolfgang A Weber,et al.  Use of PET for monitoring cancer therapy and for predicting outcome. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Design and performance evaluation of a whole-body Ingenuity TF PET–MRI system , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  W. Oyen,et al.  FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0 , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[13]  R. Nutt,et al.  A Multicrystal Two Dimensional BGO Detector System for Positron Emission Tomography , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[14]  Magnus Dahlbom,et al.  PET system calibrations and corrections for quantitative and spatially accurate images , 1989 .

[15]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Measuring PET scanner sensitivity: relating countrates to image signal-to-noise ratios using noise equivalents counts , 1990 .

[16]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Performance standards in positron emission tomography. , 1991, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  Tim Mulnix,et al.  NEMA NU 2 performance tests for scanners with intrinsic radioactivity. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  Wolfgang A Weber,et al.  Monitoring response to treatment in patients utilizing PET. , 2005, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[19]  Sulabha K. Kulkarni Applications , 2014, Nanotechnology: Principles and Practices.

[20]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 7. A technique to reduce noise in accidental coincidence measurements and coincidence efficiency calibration. , 1986, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[21]  M Dahlbom,et al.  An evaluation of a two-dimensional array detector for high resolution PET. , 1988, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[22]  Brian E. Zimmerman,et al.  Development of a Traceable Calibration Methodology for Solid 68Ge/68Ga Sources Used as a Calibration Surrogate for 18F in Radionuclide Activity Calibrators , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  William W. Moses Recent Advances and Future Advances in Time-of-Flight PET. , 2007 .

[24]  Stefan Eberl,et al.  Optimizing injected dose in clinical PET by accurately modeling the counting-rate response functions specific to individual patient scans. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[25]  R. Boellaard Standards for PET Image Acquisition and Quantitative Data Analysis , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[26]  Lawrence H Schwartz,et al.  18F-FDG PET as a candidate for "qualified biomarker": functional assessment of treatment response in oncology. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  W W Moses,et al.  OpenPET: A Flexible Electronics System for Radiotracer Imaging , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[28]  Z. Burbar,et al.  The ECAT HRRT: an example of NEMA scatter estimation issues for LSO based PET systems , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[29]  W. Oyen,et al.  Predictive and prognostic value of FDG‐PET in nonsmall‐cell lung cancer , 2007, Cancer.

[30]  Dale L. Bailey,et al.  A method for measuring the absolute sensitivity of positron emission tomographic scanners , 1991, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[31]  Catherine M. Lockhart,et al.  Quantifying and Reducing the Effect of Calibration Error on Variability of PET/CT Standardized Uptake Value Measurements , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.