Observer signal-to-noise ratios for the ML-EM algorithm

We have used an approximate method developed by Barrett, Wilson, and Tsui for finding the ensemble statistics of the maximum likelihood-expectation maximization algorithm to compute task-dependent figures of merit as a function of stopping point. For comparison, human- observer performance was assessed through conventional psychophysics. The results of our studies show the dependence of the optimal stopping point of the algorithm on the detection task. Comparisons of human and various model observers show that a channelized Hotelling observer with overlapping channels is the best predictor of human performance.

[1]  K. Lange,et al.  EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[2]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Unified SNR analysis of medical imaging systems , 1985, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  H H Barrett,et al.  Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[4]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Toward Optimal Observer Performance of Detection and Discrimination Tasks on Reconstructions from Sparse Data , 1996 .

[5]  H H Barrett,et al.  Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[6]  S. Strother,et al.  Practical tradeoffs between noise, quantitation, and number of iterations for maximum likelihood-based reconstructions. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[7]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Spatial resolution properties of penalized-likelihood image reconstruction: space-invariant tomographs , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[8]  E. Veklerov,et al.  Stopping Rule for the MLE Algorithm Based on Statistical Hypothesis Testing , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. II. Signal-location identification. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Detection And Discrimination Of Known Signals In Inhomogeneous, Random Backgrounds , 1989, Medical Imaging.

[11]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Aperture optimization for emission imaging: effect of a spatially varying background. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[12]  Kenneth M. Hanson,et al.  Method of evaluating image-recovery algorithms based on task performance , 1990 .

[13]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  B. Tsui,et al.  Noise properties of the EM algorithm: II. Monte Carlo simulations. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.