THE EFFECTS OF SENSORY MANIPULATION UPON INTERLIMB COORDINATION DURING FAST WALKING IN THE COCKROACH

1. A re-examination of fast stepping in free-walking cockroaches showed that there was considerable variation in the alternating tripod gait. 2. Small load increments applied to the whole animal significantly reduced this variability and concentrated the range and speed of movements used. 3. Animals suspended above oiled glass surfaces moved their legs in normal gait patterns indicating that mechanical coupling via the substrate was not a critical factor for normal high-speed coordination. 4. Increasing the viscosity of the oil produced the same reduction in variability found with load increment so the change cannot be due to increased mechanical coupling. 5. Increasing the viscosity of the oil under one leg alone resulted in concentration over the whole pattern so the result was not considered to be due to viscosity changes. 6. The changes seen in artificial loading situations were mimicked in natural loading situations such as walking up a slight incline. 7. The functional significance of the phenomenon for the stability of the rapidly moving animal is considered and the role of load afference in biasing central pattern generators to produce a continuous range of functional output is discussed.

[1]  G. M. Hughes.  The Co-Ordination of Insect Movements I The Walking Movements of Insects , 1952 .

[2]  G. M. Hughes.  The Co-Ordination of Insect Movements: 11. The Effect of Limb Amputation and the Cutting of Commissures In The Cockroach (Blatta Oiuentalis) , 1957 .

[3]  G. Wendler.  The co-ordination of walking movements in arthropods. , 1966, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[4]  F. Delcomyn.  The Locomotion of the Cockroach Periplaneta Americana , 1971 .

[5]  K. Pearson.  Central Programming and Reflex Control of Walking in the Cockroach , 1972 .

[6]  D. Macmillan.  A physiological analysis of walking in the American lobster (Homarus americanus). , 1975, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[7]  P. Stein.  Mechanisms of Interlimb Phase Control , 1976 .

[8]  C. Spirito,et al.  Interlimb Coordination During Slow Walking in the Cockroach: I. Effects of Substrate Alterations , 1979 .

[9]  S. Zill,et al.  THE EXOSKELETON AND INSECT PROPRIOCEPTION. I. RESPONSES OF TIBIAL CAMPANIFORM SENSILLA TO EXTERNAL AND MUSCLE-GENERATED FORCES IN THE AMERICAN COCKROACH, PERIPLANETA AMERICANA , 1981 .

[10]  H. Cruse,et al.  COORDINATED WALKING OF STICK INSECTS ON A MERCURY SURFACE , 1981 .

[11]  S. Zill,et al.  The Exoskeleton and Insect Proprioception: II. Reflex Effects of Tibial Campaniform Sensilla in the American Cockroach, Periplaneta Americana , 1981 .

[12]  S. Zill,et al.  The Exoskeleton and Insect Proprioception: III. Activity of Tribal Campaniform Sensilla During Walking in the American Cockroach, Periplaneta Americana , 1981 .

[13]  D. Graham,et al.  Behaviour and Motor Output of Stick Insects Walking on a Slippery Surface: I. Forward Walking , 1983 .

[14]  Professor Dr. Ulrich Bässler.  Neural Basis of Elementary Behavior in Stick Insects , 1983, Studies of Brain Function.

[15]  J. Kien,et al.  Intra- and intersegmental pathways active during walking in the locust , 1983, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.