Regarding inherent preferences

Abstract Commentators offer different perspectives on and reactions to the target article's [Simonson, I. (2008). Will I like a “medium” pillow: Another look at constructed and inherent preferences. Journal of Consumer Psychology ] reassessment of research and findings used to support the conclusion that preferences are inherently constructive and of the inherent preference concept. Focusing on the latter, this reply elaborates on and develops the notion of inherent preferences. Even before tasting a licorice candy or chili peppers for the first time, trying out the Nintendo Wii, and so on, the degree of dis/like for such objects is assumed to be largely determined, though such dispositions might be masked by context and other forces of construction. Dormant inherent preferences are not un/conscious and are not implicit or explicit, stored attitudes. They are likely to evolve while still dormant, due to changes in preference components that determine the overall disposition to like the composite object. I conclude with a discussion of the falsifiability and the study of inherent preferences.

[1]  E. Higgins,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. , 1996 .

[2]  Ravi Dhar,et al.  Beyond rationality: The content of preferences , 2008 .

[3]  Oded Netzer,et al.  The Synthesis of Preference: Bridging Behavioral Decision Research and Marketing Science , 2008 .

[4]  R. Dhar,et al.  The Effect of Forced Choice on Choice , 2003 .

[5]  Eliot R. Smith Embodied constraints as elements in attitude construction , 2008 .

[6]  N. Schwarz ATTITUDE CONSTRUCTION: EVALUATION IN CONTEXT , 2007 .

[7]  Jack M. Feldman,et al.  Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. , 1988 .

[8]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Attitude Representation: Attitudes as Patterns in a Distributed, Connectionist Representational System , 2007 .

[9]  P. Slovic Choice Between Equally Valued Alternatives. , 1975 .

[10]  Paul Rozin,et al.  The nature and acquisition of a preference for chili pepper by humans , 1980 .

[11]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  Toward a process model of the attitude-behavior relation: Accessing one's attitude upon mere observation of the attitude object. , 1983 .

[12]  B. Pelham,et al.  Why Susie sells seashells by the seashore: implicit egotism and major life decisions. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  E. Higgins Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. , 1996 .

[14]  Itamar Simonson,et al.  Choice Set Configuration as a Determinant of Preference Attribution and Strength , 2008 .

[15]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[16]  Kent C. Berridge,et al.  Pleasures of the brain , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[17]  J. Bettman An information processing theory of consumer choice , 1979 .

[18]  Rick B. van Baaren,et al.  On Making the Right Choice: The Deliberation-Without-Attention Effect , 2006, Science.

[19]  Eldar Shafir,et al.  Reason-based choice , 1993, Cognition.

[20]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Thinking too much: introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  I. Simonson,et al.  Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects , 1989 .

[22]  Mary Frances Luce,et al.  Preference construction and preference stability: Putting the pillow to rest , 2008 .