Statistical performance analysis of signal variance-based dipole models for MEG/EEG source localization and detection

A set of dipole fitting algorithms that incorporate different assumptions about the variability of the signal component into their mathematical models is presented and analyzed. Dipole fitting is performed by minimizing the squared error between the selected data model and available data. Dipole models based on moments that have 1) constant amplitude and orientation, 2) variable amplitude and fixed known orientation, 3) variable amplitude and fixed unknown orientation, and 4) variable amplitude and variable orientation are considered. The presence of a dipolar source is determined by comparing the fractional energy explained by the dipole model to a threshold. Source localization is accomplished by searching to find the location that explains the largest fractional signal energy using a dipole model. Expressions for the probability of a false positive decision and probability of correct detection are derived and used to evaluate the effect of variability in the dipole on performance and to address the effects of model mismatch and location errors. Simulated and measured data experiments are presented to illustrate the performance of both detection and localization methods. The results indicate that models which account for variance outperform the constant orientation and magnitude model even when the number of observations is relatively small and the signal of interest contains a very modest variance component.

[1]  R. Muirhead Aspects of Multivariate Statistical Theory , 1982, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[2]  R. Irizarry,et al.  Electrocorticographic gamma activity during word production in spoken and sign language , 2001, Neurology.

[3]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Adaptive filter theory (2nd ed.) , 1991 .

[5]  A. Dale,et al.  Improved Localizadon of Cortical Activity by Combining EEG and MEG with MRI Cortical Surface Reconstruction: A Linear Approach , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  K J Blinowska,et al.  A unified time-frequency parametrization of EEGs. , 2001, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[7]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Continuous Univariate Distributions. , 1995 .

[8]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Analysis and visualization of single‐trial event‐related potentials , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[9]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  Analyzing and Visualizing Single-Trial Event-Related Potentials , 1998, NIPS.

[10]  A. Nehorai,et al.  Detecting a dipole source by MEG/EEG and generalized likelihood ratio tests , 1996, Conference Record of The Thirtieth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[11]  B. Gordon,et al.  Induced electrocorticographic gamma activity during auditory perception , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[13]  W. Drongelen,et al.  Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Electromagnetic brain mapping , 2001, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[15]  F. Varela,et al.  Perception's shadow: long-distance synchronization of human brain activity , 1999, Nature.

[16]  H. Scheich,et al.  Stimulus-related gamma oscillations in primate auditory cortex. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  I. Reed,et al.  Rapid Convergence Rate in Adaptive Arrays , 1974, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[18]  J.C. Mosher,et al.  Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  R. Lesser,et al.  Functional mapping of human sensorimotor cortex with electrocorticographic spectral analysis. II. Event-related synchronization in the gamma band. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  W. J. Nowack Neocortical Dynamics and Human EEG Rhythms , 1995, Neurology.

[21]  S. Haykin,et al.  Adaptive Filter Theory , 1986 .

[22]  Alberto Rodriguez-Rivera,et al.  Correction to -Statistical performance analysis of signal variance-based dipole models for MEG/EEG source localization and detection , 2003, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng..

[23]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Improved Localization of Cortical Activity By Combining EEG and MEG with MRI Cortical Surface Reconstruction , 2002 .

[24]  Piotr J. Durka,et al.  Stochastic time-frequency dictionaries for matching pursuit , 2001, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[25]  R. Berk,et al.  Continuous Univariate Distributions, Volume 2 , 1995 .

[26]  Ronald W. Butler,et al.  Calculating the density and distribution function for the singly and doubly noncentral F , 2002, Stat. Comput..