Flexible Strategy Game-card Framework for Effective Strategy Execution

The past two decades have been characterized by increasing pace and complexities of change and, therefore, pose innumerable challenges for organization success. Flexibility has emerged as the prime response to such a turbulent situation. The focus of flexibility has been more on strategy formulation, although it is more critical in strategy execution. The “flexible strategy game-card” is an integrative framework of seamless strategy formulation and execution. This study is an attempt to empirically test the “flexible strategy game-card” framework and demonstrates how flexibility in the execution variables leads to better organization performance from the perspectives of both the enterprise and customer. The execution variables have been identified on the basis of literature review and discussion with the corporate practitioners. The self-administered questionnaire is used for the empirical study. Finally, this chapter discusses the managerial implications of the research findings and suggests future scope of research.

[1]  D. Macbeth,et al.  Partnership Sourcing: An Integrated Supply Chain Management Approach , 1994 .

[2]  Ram Charan,et al.  Execution: The Discipline of Getting Things Done , 2002 .

[3]  Richard T. Pascale,et al.  Managing on the edge : how successful companies use conflict to stay ahead , 1990 .

[4]  T. Jones INSTRUMENTAL STAKEHOLDER THEORY: A SYNTHESIS OF ETHICS AND ECONOMICS , 1995 .

[5]  Sushil,et al.  Modeling strategic performance factors for effective strategy execution , 2013 .

[6]  C. Fornell A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer: The Swedish Experience: , 1992 .

[7]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, , . , 2011 .

[8]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Building Flexible Organizations for Fast-moving Markets , 1997 .

[9]  R. Buchholz,et al.  Research Notes. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND STOCK MARKET PERFORMANCE. , 1978 .

[10]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences , 1993 .

[11]  C. J. McNair,et al.  Performance management in an international setting , 1993 .

[12]  C. Fornell,et al.  Customer Satisfaction, Market Share, and Profitability: Findings from Sweden , 1994 .

[13]  Sushil How Balanced is Balanced Scorecard? , 2008 .

[14]  Remko I. van Hoek,et al.  The contribution of performance measurement to the expansion of third party logistics alliances in the supply chain , 2001 .

[15]  Sushil Interpreting the Interpretive Structural Model , 2012, Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management.

[16]  R. E. Freeman,et al.  Stockholders and Stakeholders: A New Perspective on Corporate Governance , 1983 .

[17]  Jeremy F. Dent Global competition: challenges for management accounting and control , 1996 .

[18]  S. Nasim Total Interpretive Structural Modeling of Continuity and Change Forces in e-Government , 2011 .

[19]  Richard L. Shell,et al.  Time Based Manufacturing , 1993 .

[20]  Pim Roest The golden rules for implementing the balanced business scorecard , 1997, Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur..

[21]  J. Lozano,et al.  Towards the relational corporation: from managing stakeholder relationships to building stakeholder relationships (waiting for Copernicus) , 2005 .

[22]  James S. Noble,et al.  The changing basis of performance measurement , 1996 .

[23]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[24]  D. Larcker,et al.  Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction , 1998 .

[25]  H. Bahrami The Emerging Flexible Organization: Perspectives from Silicon Valley , 1992 .

[26]  D. Aaker,et al.  The Financial Information Content of Perceived Quality , 1994 .

[27]  G. Stewart Supply chain performance benchmarking study reveals keys to supply chain excellence , 1995 .

[28]  J. Kaler Differentiating Stakeholder Theories , 2003 .

[29]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system , 1996 .

[30]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Corporate Governance or Corporate Value Added?: Rethinking the Primacy of Shareholder Value , 1994 .

[31]  Grayson Cj Excerpts from "Let's Get Back to the Competitive Market System." Originally published in November-December 1973. , 1990 .

[32]  R. Buchholz,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Market Performance , 1978 .

[33]  Charles H. Noble,et al.  The Eclectic Roots of Strategy Implementation Research , 1999 .

[34]  M. Hammer,et al.  REENGINEERING THE CORPORATION: A MANIFESTO FOR BUSINESS REVOLUTION , 1995 .

[35]  Craig Eric Schneier,et al.  Performance measurement and management: A tool for strategy execution , 1991 .

[36]  Andrew Sai On Ko,et al.  Building balanced scorecard with SWOT analysis, and implementing “Sun Tzu’s The Art of Business Management Strategies” on QFD methodology , 2000 .

[37]  A. Atkinson,et al.  A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic Performance Measurement , 1997 .

[38]  Sushil,et al.  Theoretical Roots of Flexible Strategy Game-card: An Evolving Strategic Performance Management Framework , 2014 .

[39]  Hanne Nørreklit The Balance on the Balanced Scorecard: A Critical Analysis of Some of Its Assumptions , 2000 .

[40]  G. Stalk Time-The Next Source of Competitive Advantage , 1988 .

[41]  Karl-Erik Sveiby The Intangible Assets Monitor , 1997 .

[42]  Peter Bowbrick,et al.  The economics of quality, grades, and brands , 2014 .

[43]  Mark Sanger Supporting the balanced scorecard , 1998 .

[44]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Managing Strategic Innovation and Change , 2012 .

[45]  Sushil Flexible Strategy Game-card , 2010 .

[46]  Sushil,et al.  Adapt: A Critical Pillar of Strategy Execution Process , 2014 .

[47]  Patricia J. Daugherty,et al.  The Long‐Term Strategic Impact of Purchasing Partnerships , 1994 .

[48]  Sushil,et al.  Modelling drivers of adapt for effective strategy execution , 2014 .

[49]  Thomas F. Burgess,et al.  Understanding success and failure in customer relationship management , 2008 .

[50]  Roger L. Martin The execution trap , 2010 .

[51]  M. Christopher Logistics and supply chain management , 2011 .

[52]  L. G. Hrebiniak Obstacles to Effective Strategy Implementation , 2006 .

[53]  R. Edward Freeman,et al.  Divergent Stakeholder Theory , 1999 .

[54]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Execution Premium: Linking Strategy to Operations for Competitive Advantage , 2008 .

[55]  Christopher Pollitt,et al.  Bringing Consumers into Performance Measurement: concepts, consequences and constraints , 1988 .

[56]  I. Mitroff The age of paradox , 1994 .

[57]  Amit Kumar Srivastava,et al.  Act for Effective Strategy Execution: Mediating Role of Adapt , 2014 .

[58]  Michael Bromwich,et al.  Management Accounting: Pathways to Progress , 1995 .

[59]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  A framework for supply chain performance measurement , 2004 .

[60]  Sushil,et al.  Managing continuity and change: a new approach for strategizing in e‐government , 2010 .

[61]  Fredrik Nilsson,et al.  Performance measurement at Nordic companies , 2000 .

[62]  Rodney McAdam,et al.  Taking a critical perspective to the European Business Excellence Model using a balanced scorecard approach: a case study in the service sector , 1999 .

[63]  Stuart Laverick,et al.  Measuring corporate performance , 1994 .

[64]  Sushil Interpretive Ranking Process , 2009 .

[65]  Sushil,et al.  Flexible Strategy Framework for Managing Continuity and Change in E-Government , 2014 .

[66]  Adamantios Diamantopoulos,et al.  Linking market orientation and company performance: preliminary evidence on Kohli and Jaworski's framework , 1993 .

[67]  Danny Miller,et al.  The Icarus Paradox: How Exceptional Companies Bring About Their Own Downfall , 1990 .