The Effects of Phonotactic Probability and Neighborhood Density on Adults' Word Learning in Noisy Conditions.

Purpose Noisy conditions make auditory processing difficult. This study explores whether noisy conditions influence the effects of phonotactic probability (the likelihood of occurrence of a sound sequence) and neighborhood density (phonological similarity among words) on adults' word learning. Method Fifty-eight adults learned nonwords varying in phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in either an unfavorable (0-dB signal-to-noise ratio [SNR]) or a favorable (+8-dB SNR) listening condition. Word learning was assessed using a picture naming task by scoring the proportion of phonemes named correctly. Results The unfavorable 0-dB SNR condition showed a significant interaction between phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in the absence of main effects. In particular, adults learned more words when phonotactic probability and neighborhood density were both low or both high. The +8-dB SNR condition did not show this interaction. These results are inconsistent with those from a prior adult word learning study conducted under quiet listening conditions that showed main effects of word characteristics. Conclusions As the listening condition worsens, adult word learning benefits from a convergence of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density. Clinical implications are discussed for potential populations who experience difficulty with auditory perception or processing, making them more vulnerable to noise.

[1]  Mary Wagner,et al.  The Post-High School Outcomes of Young Adults with Disabilities up to 8 Years after High School: A Report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). NCSER 2011-3005. , 2011 .

[2]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  P. Rabbitt,et al.  Channel-Capacity, Intelligibility and Immediate Memory , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  Ulla Richardson,et al.  Phonological similarity neighborhoods and children’s short-term memory: Typical development and dyslexia , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[5]  D. Kemmerer,et al.  Phonotactics and Syllable Stress: Implications for the Processing of Spoken Nonsense Words , 1997, Language and speech.

[6]  Bruce A. Schneider,et al.  Investigating the Influence of Continuous Babble on Auditory Short-Term Memory Performance , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  Michael S. Gordon,et al.  Comprehension of Speeded Discourse by Younger and Older Listeners , 2009, Experimental aging research.

[8]  Andrea L Pittman,et al.  Effects of Semantic and Acoustic Context on Nonword Detection in Children With Hearing Loss , 2013, Ear and hearing.

[9]  A. Baddeley,et al.  The phonological loop as a language learning device. , 1998, Psychological review.

[10]  Cary Sas/stat ® 9.3 User's Guide the Seqdesign Procedure (chapter) Sas ® Documentation , 2011 .

[11]  G. A. Miller The Perception of Speech. , 1951 .

[12]  Karla K. McGregor,et al.  What a difference a day makes: change in memory for newly learned word forms over 24 hours. , 2014, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[13]  Ruth A Bentler,et al.  Vocabulary and working memory in children fit with hearing aids. , 2012, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[14]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[15]  Holly L Storkel,et al.  Developmental differences in the effects of phonological, lexical and semantic variables on word learning by infants* , 2008, Journal of Child Language.

[16]  Burcin Becerik-Gerber,et al.  A study on student perceptions of higher education classrooms: Impact of classroom attributes on student satisfaction and performance , 2013 .

[17]  Robert V. Shannon,et al.  Speech Perception with Cochlear Implants , 2004 .

[18]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Cochlear Implants: Auditory Prostheses and Electric Hearing , 2004, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research.

[19]  William E. Nagy,et al.  Learning Word Meanings From Context During Normal Reading , 1987 .

[20]  H. Storkel,et al.  Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning. , 2006, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[21]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[22]  Daniel L. Valente,et al.  Effects of Reverberation on Speech Recognition in Stationary and Modulated Noise by School-Aged Children and Young Adults , 2012, Ear and hearing.

[23]  S. Roodenrys,et al.  Sublexical or lexical effects on serial recall of nonwords? , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  P. Barrouillet,et al.  Time constraints and resource sharing in adults' working memory spans. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[25]  K. O'Connor,et al.  Auditory processing in autism spectrum disorder: A review , 2012, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[26]  Juliane Junker The Cat In The Hat Comes Back , 2016 .

[27]  Mirjam Moerbeek,et al.  The Consequence of Ignoring a Level of Nesting in Multilevel Analysis , 2004, Multivariate behavioral research.

[28]  Holly L Storkel,et al.  Methods for minimizing the confounding effects of word length in the analysis of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[29]  K. Schuchardt,et al.  Working memory functions in children with different degrees of intellectual disability. , 2010, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR.

[30]  Jont B. Allen,et al.  Consonant confusions in white noise. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  Margaret G. McKeown,et al.  Bringing Words to Life: Robust Vocabulary Instruction , 2002 .

[32]  Yoshitaka Nakajima,et al.  Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound Albert S. Bregman , 1992 .

[33]  Holly L. Storkel,et al.  Do children acquire dense neighborhoods? An investigation of similarity neighborhoods in lexical acquisition , 2004, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[34]  Jill R. Hoover,et al.  A Cross-Sectional Comparison of the Effects of Phonotactic Probability and Neighborhood Density on Word Learning by Preschool Children. , 2010, Journal of memory and language.

[35]  T. Lunner,et al.  Cognition counts: A working memory system for ease of language understanding (ELU) , 2008, International journal of audiology.

[36]  A. Baddeley Working memory and language: an overview. , 2003, Journal of communication disorders.

[37]  M. Davies,et al.  Endovascular treatment of tracheoinnominate artery fistula: a case report. , 2006, Vascular and endovascular surgery.

[38]  A E Geers,et al.  Working Memory in Deaf Children with Cochlear Implants: Correlations between Digit Span and Measures of Spoken Language Processing , 2000, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[39]  R. Wolfinger,et al.  Generalized linear mixed models a pseudo-likelihood approach , 1993 .

[40]  Anders Kjellberg,et al.  Poor Listening Conditions Impair Memory for Intelligible Lectures: Implications for Acoustic Classroom Standards , 2009 .

[41]  Risto Lehtonen,et al.  Multilevel Statistical Models , 2005 .

[42]  A. Samuel,et al.  Lexical configuration and lexical engagement: When adults learn new words , 2007, Cognitive Psychology.

[43]  Cesare Cornoldi,et al.  Verbal and visuospatial working memory deficits in children with Down syndrome. , 2004, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[44]  Charles Darwin,et al.  The Perception of Speech , 1961, Nature.

[45]  M. Daneman,et al.  How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  Murray Hodgson Experimental investigation of the acoustical characteristics of university classrooms , 1999 .

[47]  M. Hodgson,et al.  Measurement and prediction of typical speech and background-noise levels in university classrooms during lectures , 1999 .

[48]  Vanessa Taler,et al.  Lexical neighborhood density effects on spoken word recognition and production in healthy aging. , 2010, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[49]  C. Frankish,et al.  Phonotactic influences on short-term memory. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[50]  G. Studebaker,et al.  Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[51]  Charles Hulme,et al.  Word-frequency and phonological-neighborhood effects on verbal short-term memory. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[52]  Ruth Bentler,et al.  Digital Noise Reduction: An Overview , 2006, Trends in amplification.

[53]  David B Pisoni,et al.  Perception of Wordlikeness: Effects of Segment Probability and Length on the Processing of Nonwords. , 2000, Journal of memory and language.

[54]  G. A. Marcoulides Multilevel Analysis Techniques and Applications , 2002 .

[55]  M. D. Wang,et al.  Consonant confusions in noise: a study of perceptual features. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[56]  Timothy J. Robinson,et al.  Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications , 2002 .

[57]  Hans Verschuure,et al.  Prevalence of hearing loss in 1598 adults with an intellectual disability: Cross-sectional population based study , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[58]  H. Storkel,et al.  The independent effects of phonotactic probability and neighbourhood density on lexical acquisition by preschool children , 2011, Language and cognitive processes.

[59]  Jont B. Allen,et al.  Consonant and vowel confusions in speech-weighted noise , 2007, INTERSPEECH.

[60]  Seuss The Cat in the Hat Comes Back , 1958 .

[61]  acrean WHAT A DIFFERENCE A DAY MAKES , 2013 .

[62]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models , 2014 .

[63]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  Vocabulary Acquisition and Verbal Short-Term Memory: Computational and Neural Bases , 1997, Brain and Language.