Need for recovery from work: evaluating short-term effects of working hours, patterns and schedules

In this paper working hours, patterns and work schedules of employees were evaluated in terms of need for recovery from work. Self-administered questionnaire data from employees of the Maastricht Cohort Study on Fatigue at Work (n = 12,095) were used. Poisson regression analyses and multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that higher working hours a day and working hours a week generally went together with more need for recovery from work. Overtime work was particularly associated with higher need for recovery from work in both genders. Both male and female three-shift or irregular shift workers had higher odds of elevated need for recovery compared to day workers. When additionally controlling for work-related factors, need for recovery levels among shift workers substantially lowered. This study clearly showed that working hours and schedules are associated with need for recovery from work, with different associations for men and women. Especially the associations between work schedules and need for recovery from work were very interrelated with other work-related factors. Future studies could further investigate the possibility that shift work might function as a proxy of other work-related factors that explain the different levels in need for recovery from work, or that job demands are perceived higher among shift workers and may therefore lead to more need for recovery from work.

[1]  Die Arbeitsplatzanalyse als Grundlage der Eignungsdiagnostik , 1977 .

[2]  N. Semmer,et al.  Shiftwork, stress, and psychosomatic complaints: a comparison between workers in different shiftwork schedules, non-shiftworkers, and former shiftworkers. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[3]  Mats Fredrikson,et al.  Stress on and off the job as related to sex and occupational status in white‐collar workers , 1989 .

[4]  P. Bohle,et al.  The impact of night work on psychological well-being. , 1989, Ergonomics.

[5]  T. Åkerstedt,et al.  Psychological and psychophysiological effects of shift work. , 1990, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[6]  Timothy H. Monk,et al.  Making shift work tolerable , 1992 .

[7]  Nancy L. Galambos,et al.  Work hours, schedule inflexibility, and stress in dual-earner spouses. , 1992 .

[8]  P Knauth,et al.  The design of shift systems. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[9]  F M Fischer,et al.  Day- and shiftworkers' leisure time. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[10]  M. Härmä,et al.  Individual differences in tolerance to shiftwork: a review. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[11]  M.J.P.M. van Veldhoven,et al.  Het meten van psychosociale arbeidsbelasting met een vragenlijst : de vragenlijst Beleving en Beoordeling van de Arbeid (VBBA) , 1994 .

[12]  P. Totterdell,et al.  Recovery from work shifts: how long does it take? , 1995, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  A.W.K. Gaillard.  Mentale belasting en werkstress , 1996 .

[14]  P Knauth,et al.  Designing better shift systems. , 1996, Applied ergonomics.

[15]  S Milosević,et al.  Drivers' fatigue studies. , 1997, Ergonomics.

[16]  S Folkard,et al.  Industrial shift systems. , 1998, Applied ergonomics.

[17]  M. Härmä,et al.  Combined effects of shift work and life-style on the prevalence of insomnia, sleep deprivation and daytime sleepiness. , 1998, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[18]  S Folkard,et al.  Work shift duration: a review comparing eight hour and 12 hour shift systems. , 1998, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[19]  K. Parkes,et al.  Shiftwork, job type, and the work environment as joint predictors of health-related outcomes. , 1999, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[20]  K Saito,et al.  Measurement of fatigue in industries. , 1999, Industrial health.

[21]  A J van der Beek,et al.  The influence of work characteristics on the need for recovery and experienced health: a study on coach drivers. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[22]  F. J. N. Nijhuis,et al.  Flexible work schedules and mental and physical health. A study of a working population with non‐traditional working hours , 1999 .

[23]  I. Kant,et al.  Fatigue among working people: validity of a questionnaire measure , 2000, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[24]  I. Kant,et al.  De Maastrichtse Cohort Studie naar langdurige psychische vermoeidheid in de arbeidssituatie Epidemiologie Longitudinaalonderzoek Risicofactoren Vermoeidheid , 2000 .

[25]  M. Frings-Dresen,et al.  The trucker strain monitor: an occupation-specific questionnaire measuring psychological job strain , 2001, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[26]  I. Kant,et al.  Differences in Fatigue and Psychological Distress Across Occupations: Results From The Maastricht Cohort Study of Fatigue at Work , 2001, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[27]  H. Bøggild,et al.  Work environment of Danish shift and day workers. , 2001, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[28]  J. Sluiter,et al.  The relation between work-induced neuroendocrine reactivity and recovery, subjective need for recovery, and health status. , 2001, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[29]  IJmert Kant,et al.  Need for recovery in the working population: Description and associations with fatigue and psychological distress , 2002, International journal of behavioral medicine.