Switchgrass growth and pine–switchgrass interactions in established intercropping systems

Intercropping switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) with loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) has been proposed for producing bioenergy feedstock in the southeastern United States. This study investigated switchgrass growth and pine–switchgrass interactions at two established experimental fields (7‐year‐old Lenoir site and 5‐year‐old Carteret site) located on the coastal plain of eastern United States. Position effects (edge and center of switchgrass alley in intercropping plots) and treatment effects (intercropping vs. grass‐only) on aboveground switchgrass growth were evaluated. Interspecific interactions with respect to capturing resources (light, soil water, and nitrogen) were investigated by measuring photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) above grass canopy, soil moisture, and soil mineral nitrogen contents. Switchgrass growth was significantly (P = 0.001) affected by treatments in Lenoir and by position (P < 0.0001) in both study sites. Relative to the center, PAR above grass canopy at edge in both sites was about 48% less during the growing season. Soil water content during the growing season at the edge of grass alley was significantly (P = 0.0001) lower by 23% than at the center in Lenoir, while no significant (P = 0.42) difference was observed in Carteret, in spite of more grass growth at center at both sites. Soil mineral nitrogen content at the center of intercropping plots in Lenoir (no fertilization during 2015) was significantly (P < 0.07) lower than at the edge during the peak of growing season (June, July, and August), but not during early and late parts of growing season (May, September, and November). Position effects on soil water and mineral nitrogen were less evident under conditions with higher external inputs (rainfall and fertilization) and lower plant uptake during nongrowing seasons. Results from this study contributed to a better understanding of above‐ and belowground pine–switchgrass interactions which is necessary to properly manage this new cultivation system for bioenergy production in the southeastern United States.

[1]  S. Haile,et al.  Potential of loblolly pine: switchgrass alley cropping for provision of biofuel feedstock , 2016, Agroforestry Systems.

[2]  C. Dupraz,et al.  The introduction of hybrid walnut trees (Juglans nigra × regia cv. NG23) into cropland reduces soil mineral N content in autumn in southern France , 2016, Agroforestry Systems.

[3]  George M. Chescheir,et al.  Switchgrass growth and morphological changes under established pine-grass agroforestry systems in the lower coastal plain of North Carolina, United States. , 2015 .

[4]  E. Tollner,et al.  Effects of Site Preparation for Pine Forest/Switchgrass Intercropping on Water Quality. , 2015, Journal of environmental quality.

[5]  D. Hall,et al.  Competition for water between annual crops and short rotation mallee in dry climate agroforestry: The case for crop segregation rather than integration , 2015 .

[6]  Zakiya H. Leggett,et al.  Gas exchange and stand-level estimates of water use and gross primary productivity in an experimental pine and switchgrass intercrop forestry system on the Lower Coastal Plain of North Carolina, U.S.A , 2014 .

[7]  Bruce E. Dale,et al.  Take a closer look: biofuels can support environmental, economic and social goals. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  J. Stape,et al.  Evaluating changes in switchgrass physiology, biomass, and light-use efficiency under artificial shade to estimate yields if intercropped with Pinus taeda L. , 2014, Agroforestry Systems.

[9]  B. Strahm,et al.  Switchgrass intercropping reduces soil inorganic nitrogen in a young loblolly pine plantation located in coastal North Carolina. , 2014 .

[10]  G. Johnson,et al.  Establishment and early productivity of perennial biomass alley cropping systems in Minnesota, USA , 2014, Agroforestry Systems.

[11]  W. Xi,et al.  Intercropping Competition between Apple Trees and Crops in Agroforestry Systems on the Loess Plateau of China , 2013, PloS one.

[12]  G. Vourlitis,et al.  Erratum to: Fitting net photosynthetic light-response curves with Microsoft Excel — a critical look at the models , 2013, Photosynthetica.

[13]  A. Metay,et al.  Assessing Light Competition for Cereal Production in Temperate Agroforestry Systems using Experimentation and Crop Modelling , 2013 .

[14]  Devendra M. Amatya,et al.  Predicting dissolved organic nitrogen export from a drained loblolly pine plantation , 2013 .

[15]  J. Domec,et al.  Evaluation of intercropped switchgrass establishment under a range of experimental site preparation treatments in a forested setting on the Lower Coastal Plain of North Carolina, U.S.A. , 2012 .

[16]  E. Vance,et al.  Loblolly Pine Age and Density Affects Switchgrass Growth and Soil Carbon in an Agroforestry System , 2012 .

[17]  Shiying Tian,et al.  Temporal variations and controlling factors of nitrogen export from an artificially drained coastal forest. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  C. Böhm,et al.  Ecological benefits provided by alley cropping systems for production of woody biomass in the temperate region: a review , 2012, Agroforestry Systems.

[19]  P. Lal,et al.  Economics of intercropping loblolly pine and switchgrass for bioenergy markets in the southeastern United States , 2012, Agroforestry Systems.

[20]  Michael C. Dietze,et al.  A quantitative review comparing the yield of switchgrass in monocultures and mixtures in relation to climate and management factors , 2010 .

[21]  K. Osoro,et al.  Silvopastoralism in New Zealand: review of effects of evergreen and deciduous trees on pasture dynamics , 2009, Agroforestry Systems.

[22]  C. Everson,et al.  Soil water competition in a temperate hedgerow agroforestry system in South Africa , 2009, Agroforestry Systems.

[23]  Stephen P. Long,et al.  Meeting US biofuel goals with less land: the potential of Miscanthus , 2008 .

[24]  Baoping Wang,et al.  Light distribution, photosynthetic rate and yield in a Paulownia-wheat intercropping system in China , 2008, Agroforestry Systems.

[25]  R. Perrin,et al.  Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Paul J. Burgess,et al.  Modeling environmental benefits of silvoarable agroforestry in Europe , 2007 .

[27]  D. Tilman,et al.  Carbon-Negative Biofuels from Low-Input High-Diversity Grassland Biomass , 2006, Science.

[28]  L. A. Kszos,et al.  Development of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) as a bioenergy feedstock in the United States. , 2005 .

[29]  K. Johnsen,et al.  Quantifying root lateral distribution and turnover using pine trees with a distinct stable carbon isotope signature , 2005 .

[30]  S. Jose,et al.  Interspecific interactions in temperate agroforestry , 2004, Agroforestry Systems.

[31]  Peter J. Gregory,et al.  Competition in tree row agroforestry systems. 3. Soil water distribution and dynamics , 2004, Plant and Soil.

[32]  I. Hirota,et al.  A split-root apparatus for examining the effects of hydraulic lift by trees on the water status of neighbouring crops , 2004, Agroforestry Systems.

[33]  D. Amatya,et al.  Effects of Orifice-Weir Outlet on Hydrology and Water Quality of a Drained Forested Watershed , 2003 .

[34]  S. Pallardy,et al.  Resource competition across the crop-tree interface in a maize-silver maple temperate alley cropping stand in Missouri , 2001, Agroforestry Systems.

[35]  S. Jose,et al.  Defining competition vectors in a temperate alley cropping system in the midwestern USA: 1. Production physiology , 2000, Agroforestry Systems.

[36]  S. Jose,et al.  Defining competition vectors in a temperate alley cropping system in the midwestern USA: 2. Competition for water , 2000, Agroforestry Systems.

[37]  S. Jose,et al.  Defining competition vectors in a temperate alley cropping system in the midwestern USA: 3. Competition for nitrogen and litter decomposition dynamics , 2000, Agroforestry Systems.

[38]  H. E. Garrett,et al.  Shade effects on forage crops with potential in temperate agroforestry practices , 1998, Agroforestry Systems.

[39]  T. Dawson,et al.  Hydraulic lift and its influence on the water content of the rhizosphere: an example from sugar maple, Acer saccharum , 1996, Oecologia.

[40]  D. Amatya,et al.  Effects of controlled drainage on the hydrology of drained pine plantations in the North Carolina coastal plain , 1996 .

[41]  P. Jarvis,et al.  Effects of nitrogen fertiliser on tree/pasture competition during the establishment phase of a silvopastoral system , 1994 .

[42]  D. Buxton,et al.  Growth of C3 and C4 perennial grasses under reduced irradiance , 1992 .

[43]  C. Black,et al.  Above and below ground interactions in agroforestry systems , 1991 .

[44]  R. Singh,et al.  Above and below ground interactions in alley-cropping in semi-arid India , 1989, Agroforestry Systems.

[45]  J. W. Palmer,et al.  Interception of Light by Model Hedgerow Orchards in Relation to Latitude, Time of Year and Hedgerow Configuration and Orientation , 1972 .

[46]  R. Wayne Skaggs,et al.  Impacts of Switchgrass-Loblolly Pine Intercropping on Soil Physical Properties of a Drained Forest , 2015 .

[47]  S. Roberts,et al.  Early competitive effects on growth of loblolly pine grown in co-culture with switchgrass , 2015 .

[48]  Devendra M. Amatya,et al.  Predicting dissolved organic nitrogen export from an drained pine plantation , 2013 .

[49]  G. Vourlitis,et al.  Fitting net photosynthetic light-response curves with Microsoft Excel — a critical look at the models , 2013, Photosynthetica.

[50]  R. W. Skaggs,et al.  Long-term hydrology and water quality of a drained pine plantation in North Carolina , 2011 .

[51]  É. Malézieux,et al.  Mixing plant species in cropping systems: concepts, tools and models. A review , 2011, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[52]  G. Schroth.  A review of belowground interactions in agroforestry, focussing on mechanisms and management options , 2004, Agroforestry Systems.

[53]  P. Cruz.  Effect of shade on the growth and mineral nutrition of a C4 perennial grass under field conditions , 2004, Plant and Soil.