Inoculum Effect with Cefazolin among Clinical Isolates of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus: Frequency and Possible Cause of Cefazolin Treatment Failure

ABSTRACT Methicillin (meticillin)-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) strains producing large amounts of type A β-lactamase (Bla) have been associated with cefazolin failures, but the frequency and impact of these strains have not been well studied. Here we examined 98 MSSA clinical isolates and found that 26% produced type A Bla, 15% type B, 46% type C, and none type D and that 13% lacked blaZ. The cefazolin MIC90 was 2 μg/ml for a standard inoculum and 32 μg/ml for a high inoculum, with 19% of isolates displaying a pronounced inoculum effect (MICs of ≥16 μg/ml with 107 CFU/ml) (9 type A and 10 type C Bla producers). At the high inoculum, type A producers displayed higher cefazolin MICs than type B or C producers, while type B and C producers displayed higher cefamandole MICs. Among isolates from hemodialysis patients with MSSA bacteremia, three from the six patients who experienced cefazolin failure showed a cefazolin inoculum effect, while none from the six patients successfully treated with cefazolin showed an inoculum effect, suggesting an association between these strains and cefazolin failure (P = 0.09 by Fisher's exact test). In summary, 19% of MSSA clinical isolates showed a pronounced inoculum effect with cefazolin, a phenomenon that could explain the cases of cefazolin failure previously reported for hemodialysis patients with MSSA bacteremia. These results suggest that for serious MSSA infections, the presence of a significant inoculum effect with cefazolin could be associated with clinical failure in patients treated with this cephalosporin, particularly when it is used at low doses.

[1]  V. Fowler,et al.  Telavancin versus vancomycin for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections caused by gram-positive organisms. , 2008, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[2]  Lisa Saiman,et al.  Endocarditis and Intravascular Infections , 2008 .

[3]  L. Szczech,et al.  Use of vancomycin or first-generation cephalosporins for the treatment of hemodialysis-dependent patients with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. , 2007, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[4]  V. Fowler,et al.  Telavancin versus Standard Therapy for Treatment of Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections Caused by Gram-Positive Bacteria: FAST 2 Study , 2006, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[5]  Robin Patel,et al.  Lack of association of Staphylococcus aureus type A beta-lactamase with cefazolin combined with antimicrobial spacer placement prosthetic joint infection treatment failure. , 2006, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease.

[6]  David R. Snydman,et al.  Staphylococcus aureus Native Valve Infective Endocarditis: Report of 566 Episodes From the International Collaboration on Endocarditis Merged DatabaseMiro JM, and the International Collaboration on Endocarditis Merged Database Study Group (Univ of Barcelona; et al) Clin Infect Dis 41:507–514, 2005§ , 2006 .

[7]  Bruno Hoen,et al.  Staphylococcus aureus native valve infective endocarditis: report of 566 episodes from the International Collaboration on Endocarditis Merged Database. , 2005, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[8]  M. Fernández-Guerrero,et al.  Cefazolin therapy for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. , 2005, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[9]  Kavindra V. Singh,et al.  Relapse of type A beta-lactamase-producing Staphylococcus aureus native valve endocarditis during cefazolin therapy: revisiting the issue. , 2003, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[10]  K. Wilson Preparation of Genomic DNA from Bacteria , 2001, Current protocols in molecular biology.

[11]  R. Kumar Preparation of genomic DNA from bacteria , 2001 .

[12]  Mary Jane Ferraro,et al.  Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically : approved standard , 2000 .

[13]  D. Kernodle,et al.  Characterization of a Chromosomal Gene Encoding Type B β-Lactamase in Phage Group II Isolates ofStaphylococcus aureus , 1998, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[14]  G. Weinstock,et al.  In vivo testing of an Enterococcus faecalis efaA mutant and use of efaA homologs for species identification. , 1998, FEMS immunology and medical microbiology.

[15]  G. Weinstock,et al.  Repetitive Sequence-Based PCR versus Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis for Typing of Enterococcus faecalis at the Subspecies Level , 1998, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[16]  C. Stratton,et al.  Association of Borderline Oxacillin-Susceptible Strains of Staphylococcus aureus with Surgical Wound Infections , 1998, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[17]  D. Kernodle,et al.  Structure-function relationships among wild-type variants of Staphylococcus aureus beta-lactamase: importance of amino acids 128 and 216 , 1996, Journal of bacteriology.

[18]  A. Bisno,et al.  Antibiotic treatment of adults with infective endocarditis due to streptococci, enterococci, staphylococci, and HACEK microorganisms. American Heart Association. , 1995, JAMA.

[19]  T. Nishino,et al.  Role of β-lactamase of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in resistance to first-generation oral cephems both in vitro and in vivo , 1994 .

[20]  C. Stratton,et al.  Characterization of four beta-lactamases produced by Staphylococcus aureus , 1992, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[21]  C. Stratton,et al.  Use of extracts versus whole-cell bacterial suspensions in the identification of Staphylococcus aureus beta-lactamase variants , 1990, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[22]  D. Classen,et al.  Failure of cephalosporins to prevent Staphylococcus aureus surgical wound infections. , 1990, JAMA.

[23]  C. Stratton,et al.  Differentiation of beta-lactamase variants of Staphylococcus aureus by substrate hydrolysis profiles. , 1989, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[24]  W. Bruns,et al.  Extracellular and membrane-bound beta lactamase of Staphylococcus aureus: their importance for the expression of penicillin resistance. , 1987, Journal of medical microbiology.

[25]  Rosdahl Vt Penicillinase production in Staphylococcus aureus strains of clinical importance. , 1986 .

[26]  V. Rosdahl Penicillinase production in Staphylococcus aureus strains of clinical importance. , 1986, Danish medical bulletin.

[27]  R. Gustilo,et al.  Bone and serum concentrations of five cephalosporin drugs. Relevance to prophylaxis and treatment in orthopedic surgery. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[28]  John E. Bennett,et al.  Principles and practice of infectious diseases. Vols 1 and 2. , 1979 .

[29]  R. Bryant,et al.  Unsuccessful treatment of staphylococcal endocarditis with cefazolin. , 1977, JAMA.

[30]  M. Richmond Immunological techniques for studying beta-lactamases. , 1975, Methods in enzymology.

[31]  D. Pohlod,et al.  Clinical experiences with cefazolin and other cephalosporins in bacterial endocarditis. , 1973, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[32]  J. Gold,et al.  Experience with cefazolin: an overall summary of pharmacologic and clinical trials in man. , 1973, The Journal of infectious diseases.