Effects of Geometric Distortions on Face-Recognition Performance

The importance of ‘configural’ processing for face recognition is now well established, but it remains unclear precisely what it entails. Through four experiments we attempted to clarify the nature of configural processing by investigating the effects of various affine transformations on the recognition of familiar faces. Experiment 1 showed that recognition was markedly impaired by inversion of faces, somewhat impaired by shearing or horizontally stretching them, but unaffected by vertical stretching of faces to twice their normal height. In experiment 2 we investigated vertical and horizontal stretching in more detail, and found no effects of either transformation. Two further experiments were performed to determine whether participants were recognising stretched faces by using configural information. Experiment 3 showed that nonglobal vertical stretching of faces (stretching either the top or the bottom half while leaving the remainder undistorted) impaired recognition, implying that configural information from the stretched part of the face was influencing the process of recognition — ie that configural processing involves global facial properties. In experiment 4 we examined the effects of Gaussian blurring on recognition of undistorted and vertically stretched faces. Faces remained recognisable even when they were both stretched and blurred, implying that participants were basing their judgments on configural information from these stimuli, rather than resorting to some strategy based on local featural details. The tolerance of spatial distortions in human face recognition suggests that the configural information used as a basis for face recognition is unlikely to involve information about the absolute position of facial features relative to each other, at least not in any simple way

[1]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[2]  R. Galper,et al.  Recognition of faces in photographic negative , 1970 .

[3]  N. Kretchmer Lactose and lactase. , 1972, Scientific American.

[4]  L. D. Harmon The recognition of faces. , 1973, Scientific American.

[5]  Gordon Rae Table of A′ , 1976 .

[6]  S. McKelvie,et al.  The Role of Eyes and Mouth in the Memory of a Face. , 1976 .

[7]  H. Ellis,et al.  Cue Saliency in Faces as Assessed by the ‘Photofit’ Technique , 1977, Perception.

[8]  J. Sergent An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception. , 1984, British journal of psychology.

[9]  N D Haig,et al.  How Faces Differ—A New Comparative Technique , 1985, Perception.

[10]  J. Sergent Microgenesis of Face Perception , 1986 .

[11]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Identification and ratings of caricatures: Implications for mental representations of faces , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[13]  N D Haig,et al.  The Effect of Feature Displacement on the Perception of Well-Known Faces , 1988, Perception.

[14]  T. Valentine Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. , 1988, British journal of psychology.

[15]  C. McManus,et al.  Sensitivity to the Displacement of Facial Features in Negative and Inverted Images , 1990, Perception.

[16]  T A Busey,et al.  Compensation is unnecessary for the perception of faces in slanted pictures , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  V. Bruce,et al.  Remembering facial configurations , 1991, Cognition.

[18]  D. Perrett,et al.  Perception and recognition of photographic quality facial caricatures: Implications for the recognition of natural images , 1991 .

[19]  T. Valentine The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology a Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[20]  T. Bachmann Identification of spatially quantised tachistoscopic images of faces: How many pixels does it take to carry identity? , 1991 .

[21]  V Bruce,et al.  Modelling face recognition. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[22]  Joachim M. Buhmann,et al.  Distortion Invariant Object Recognition in the Dynamic Link Architecture , 1993, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[23]  Discriminability of different parts of faces , 1993 .

[24]  G. Rhodes,et al.  What's lost in inverted faces? , 1993, Cognition.

[25]  D. Perrett,et al.  Visual Processing of Facial Distinctiveness , 1994, Perception.

[26]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Understanding face recognition: Caricauture effects, inversion, and the homogeneity problem , 1994 .

[27]  G. Hole Configurational Factors in the Perception of Unfamiliar Faces , 1994, Perception.

[28]  V. Bruce Stability from Variation: The Case of Face Recognition the M.D. Vernon Memorial Lecture , 1994, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[29]  I. Craw,et al.  Spatial Content and Spatial Quantisation Effects in Face Recognition , 1994, Perception.

[30]  S. Ullman,et al.  Generalization to Novel Images in Upright and Inverted Faces , 1993, Perception.

[31]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Face recognition under varying poses: The role of texture and shape , 1996, Vision Research.

[32]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Inversion and processing of component and spatial-relational information in faces. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  I Biederman,et al.  To what extent can matching algorithms based on direct outputs of spatial filters account for human object recognition? , 1996, Spatial vision.

[34]  R Kemp,et al.  Perception and Recognition of Normal and Negative Faces: The Role of Shape from Shading and Pigmentation Cues , 1996, Perception.

[35]  I Biederman,et al.  Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[36]  Norbert Krüger,et al.  Face Recognition by Elastic Bunch Graph Matching , 1997, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[37]  Michael B. Lewis,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article the Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section a Understanding Caricatures of Faces , 2022 .

[38]  Robert A. Johnston,et al.  A Unified Account of the Effects of Caricaturing Faces , 1999 .

[39]  G. Hole,et al.  Evidence for Holistic Processing of Faces Viewed as Photographic Negatives , 1999, Perception.

[40]  I. Biederman,et al.  Subordinate-level object classification reexamined , 1999, Psychological research.

[41]  G. Hole,et al.  The role of spatial and surface cues in the age-processing of unfamiliar faces , 2000 .

[42]  G. Hole,et al.  Featural and Configurational Processes in the Recognition of Faces of Different Familiarity , 2000, Perception.

[43]  E. Cooper,et al.  Differences in the coding of spatial relations in face identification and basic-level object recognition. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[44]  József Fiser,et al.  To What Extent Can Matching Algorithms Based on Direct Outputs of Low Level Generic Descriptors Account for Human Object Recognition , 2001 .

[45]  Sun Da Feature-Based Face Recognition by Elastic Graph Matching , 2002 .

[46]  E. Cooper,et al.  The Priming of Face Recognition after Metric Transformations , 2002, Perception.