Bayesian Inference and Prediction of Gaussian Random Fields Based on Censored Data

This work develops a Bayesian approach to perform inference and prediction in Gaussian random fields based on spatial censored data. These type of data occur often in the earth sciences due either to limitations of the measuring device or particular features of the sampling process used to collect the data. Inference and prediction on the underlying Gaussian random field is performed, through data augmentation, by using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Previous approaches to deal with spatial censored data are reviewed, and their limitations pointed out. The proposed Bayesian approach is applied to a spatial dataset of depths of a geologic horizon that contains both left- and right-censored data, and comparisons are made between inferences based on the censored data and inferences based on “complete data” obtained by two imputation methods. It is seen that the differences in inference between the two approaches can be substantial.

[1]  Murray Aitkin,et al.  A Note on the Regression Analysis of Censored Data , 1981 .

[2]  Fred Espen Benth,et al.  Kriging with Inequality Constraints , 2001 .

[3]  Sylvia Richardson,et al.  Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice , 1997 .

[4]  Xiao-Li Meng,et al.  Simulating Normalizing Constants: From Importance Sampling to Bridge Sampling to Path Sampling , 1998 .

[5]  Mike Rees,et al.  5. Statistics for Spatial Data , 1993 .

[6]  S. Caudill Maximum likelihood estimation in a model with interval data: A comment and extension , 1996 .

[7]  Clement Kostov,et al.  An interpolation method taking into account inequality constraints: I. Methodology , 1986 .

[8]  Noel A. C. Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data: Cressie/Statistics , 1993 .

[9]  M. Stein,et al.  A Bayesian analysis of kriging , 1993 .

[10]  Robert H. Shumway,et al.  Estimating Mean Concentrations Under Transformation for Environmental Data With Detection Limits , 1989 .

[11]  Victor De Oliveira,et al.  Bayesian Hot Spot Detection in the Presence of a Spatial Trend: Application to Total Nitrogen Concen , 2002 .

[12]  Clement Kostov,et al.  An interpolation method taking into account inequality constraints: II. Practical approach , 1986 .

[13]  R B D'Agostino,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation for interval-censored data using a Weibull-based accelerated failure time model. , 1992, Biometrics.

[14]  M. Silvapulle,et al.  Existence of Maximum Likelihood Estimates in Regression Models for Grouped and Ungrouped data , 1986 .

[15]  Ana F. Militino,et al.  Analyzing Censored Spatial Data , 1999 .

[16]  W. Gilks Markov Chain Monte Carlo , 2005 .

[17]  J. Berger,et al.  Objective Bayesian Analysis of Spatially Correlated Data , 2001 .

[18]  A. Gelfand,et al.  Bayesian Variogram Modeling for an Isotropic Spatial Process , 1997 .

[19]  P. Kitanidis Parameter Uncertainty in Estimation of Spatial Functions: Bayesian Analysis , 1986 .

[20]  Michael L. Stein,et al.  Prediction and Inference for Truncated Spatial Data , 1992 .

[21]  S. Chib,et al.  Analysis of multivariate probit models , 1998 .

[22]  B. Kedem,et al.  Bayesian Prediction of Transformed Gaussian Random Fields , 1997 .

[23]  A Note on the Existence of Maximum Likelihood Estimates in Linear Regression Models Using Interval-censored Data , 1988 .

[24]  Martin A. Tanner,et al.  Posterior Computations for Censored Regression Data , 1990 .

[25]  V. D. Oliveira,et al.  Bayesian prediction of clipped Gaussian random fields , 2000 .