Pedestrian and Bicyclist Traffic Control Device Evaluation Methods

This report offers traffic engineering practitioners information on how to evaluate roadway traffic control devices used by pedestrians and bicyclists. Though presented in the context of devices meant for pedestrian and bicyclist facilities, the guidance provided can be applied in a more general sense to evaluations of traffic control devices in all settings. The evaluation methods report is designed for practitioners (State transportation departments and county or city engineers and planners) but could also be helpful to traffic safety students and researchers. Personnel without specialized statistical analysis skills should be able to use the report. It presents a detailed plan for practitioners to follow from the initial problem identification stages to documenting the evaluation effort. The first step of any evaluation is to clearly formulate the research question by identifying the motorist, pedestrian, or bicyclist behavior that poses a safety or operational problem. Candidate traffic control devices and other countermeasures can then be identified as potential solutions to that problem. The evaluation methods described in this report include user surveys or interviews, visibility studies, driving performance studies, observational traffic studies, and crash analyses. The selection of the appropriate evaluation method will consider cost, time, research aims, and available research equipment and staff.

[1]  Kay Fitzpatrick,et al.  Improving pedestrian safety at unsignalized crossings , 2007 .

[2]  Ron Van Houten,et al.  Effects of Yellow Rectangular Rapid-Flashing Beacons on Yielding at Multilane Uncontrolled Crosswalks , 2010 .

[3]  Ann Do Evaluation of Shared Lane Markings , 2010 .

[4]  Bhagwant Persaud,et al.  Crash Cost Estimates by Maximum Police-Reported Injury Severity Within Selected Crash Geometries , 2005 .

[5]  S T Chrysler,et al.  3D VISUALIZATION AS A TOOL TO EVALUATE SIGN COMPREHENSION , 2004 .

[6]  J T Bates AN ENGINEERING EXPERT AND THE EVIDENCE , 1994 .

[7]  Kay Fitzpatrick,et al.  Crosswalk Marking Field Visibility Study , 2010 .

[8]  Kay Fitzpatrick,et al.  Safety Effectiveness of the HAWK Pedestrian Crossing Treatment , 2010 .

[9]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  Observational Before-After Studies in Road Safety , 1997 .

[10]  Amanda K. Emo,et al.  Evaluating and Validating a New Pedestrian Exposure to Risk Metric , 2008 .

[11]  Joseph E. Hummer,et al.  FIELD EVALUATION OF FLUORESCENT STRONG YELLOW-GREEN PEDESTRIAN WARNING SIGNS , 1996 .

[12]  Frank Markowitz,et al.  Pedestrian Countdown Signals: Experience with an Extensive Pilot Installation , 2006 .

[13]  法律 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices , 2010 .

[14]  S. Emerson,et al.  AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). 2001. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Fourth Edition. Washington, D.C. , 2007 .

[15]  J. Stewart,et al.  Safety effects of marked vs unmarked crosswalks at uncontrolled locations: executive summary and recommended guidelines , 2002 .

[16]  R L Knoblauch,et al.  MODEL PEDESTRIAN SAFETY PROGRAM USER'S GUIDE , 1987 .

[17]  William M. K. Trochim,et al.  Research methods knowledge base , 2001 .