Hierarchical genetic algorithm versus static optimization-investigation of elbow flexion and extension movements.

The applicability of static optimization (and, respectively, frequently used objective functions) for prediction of individual muscle forces for dynamic conditions has often been discussed. Some of the problems are whether time-independent objective functions are suitable, and how to incorporate muscle physiology in models. The present paper deals with a twofold task: (1) implementation of hierarchical genetic algorithm (HGA) based on the properties of the motor units (MUs) twitches, and using multi-objective, time-dependent optimization functions; and (2) comparison of the results of the HGA application with those obtained through static optimization with a criterion "minimum of a weighted sum of the muscle forces raised to the power of n". HGA and its software implementation are presented. The moments of neural stimulation of all MUs are design variables coding the problem in the terms of HGA. The main idea is in using genetic operations to find these moments, so that the sum of MUs twitches satisfies the imposed goals (required joint moments, minimal sum of muscle forces, etc.). Elbow flexion and extension movements with different velocities are considered as proper illustration. It is supposed that they are performed by two extensor muscles and three flexor muscles. The results show that HGA is a suitable means for precise investigation of motor control. Many experimentally observed phenomena (such as antagonistic co-contraction, three-phasic behavior of the muscles during fast movements) can find their explanation by the properties of the MUs twitches. Static optimization is also able to predict three-phasic behavior and could be used as practicable and computationally inexpensive method for total estimation of the muscle forces.

[1]  Gurfinkel' Vs,et al.  Some properties of linear relaxation in unfused tetanus of human muscle. , 1992 .

[2]  S. Jonic,et al.  Three machine learning techniques for automatic determination of rules to control locomotion , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  W Herzog,et al.  Dynamic muscle force predictions from EMG: an artificial neural network approach. , 1999, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[4]  G. E. Johnson,et al.  Muscular synergism--II. A minimum-fatigue criterion for load sharing between synergistic muscles. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  P Bawa,et al.  Repetitive doublets in human flexor carpi radialis muscle. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  Ronald E. Barr,et al.  Muscle activity in rapid multi-degree-of-freedom elbow movements: solutions from a musculoskeletal model , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.

[7]  F. Zajac.  Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. , 1989, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[8]  B. Prilutsky,et al.  Forces of individual cat ankle extensor muscles during locomotion predicted using static optimization. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  R Raikova,et al.  A model of the flexion-extension motion in the elbow joint some problems concerning muscle forces modelling and computation. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Antonio Pedotti,et al.  Optimization of muscle-force sequencing in human locomotion , 1978 .

[11]  R Bartlett,et al.  Inverse optimization: functional and physiological considerations related to the force-sharing problem. , 1997, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[12]  S A Kosterin,et al.  [Kinetic analysis of contraction-relaxation process in smooth muscles]. , 1990, Biofizika.

[13]  V S Gurfinkel,et al.  Some properties of linear relaxation in unfused tetanus of human muscle. , 1992, Physiological research.

[14]  Yasuharu Koike,et al.  Estimation of dynamic joint torques and trajectory formation from surface electromyography signals using a neural network model , 1995, Biological Cybernetics.

[15]  M L Latash,et al.  Organizing principles for single joint movements: V. Agonist-antagonist interactions. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  M G Pandy,et al.  Static and dynamic optimization solutions for gait are practically equivalent. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Y. Yamazaki,et al.  Reciprocal activation and coactivation in antagonistic muscles during rapid goal-directed movements , 1994, Brain Research Bulletin.

[18]  D Kosarov,et al.  Activity of single motor units during voluntary control of isometric tension in human muscles. , 1978, Acta physiologica et pharmacologica Bulgarica.

[19]  D. Kernell,et al.  Organization and properties of spinal motoneurones and motor units. , 1986, Progress in brain research.

[20]  R. Johansson,et al.  Twitch properties of human thenar motor units measured in response to intraneural motor-axon stimulation. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Daniel M. Corcos,et al.  Relations between joint torque, motion, and electromyographic patterns at the human elbow , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  R. Crowninshield,et al.  A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion. , 1981, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  Michael D. Vose,et al.  The simple genetic algorithm - foundations and theory , 1999, Complex adaptive systems.

[24]  Ravindra K. Ahuja,et al.  Inverse Optimization , 2001, Oper. Res..

[25]  H. B. K. Boom,et al.  Calcium model for mammalian skeletal muscle , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[26]  F C Su,et al.  Design and testing of a genetic algorithm neural network in the assessment of gait patterns. , 2000, Medical engineering & physics.

[27]  D Kosarov,et al.  Discharge frequency of the motor units in human muscles under different stationary isometric tension, investigated by a new method. , 1978, Acta physiologica et pharmacologica Bulgarica.

[28]  G. Loeb.  Hard lessons in motor control from the mammalian spinal cord , 1987, Trends in Neurosciences.

[29]  W. Herzog,et al.  Prediction of dynamic tendon forces from electromyographic signals: An artificial neural network approach , 1997, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[30]  L. Thompson,et al.  Effects of age and training on skeletal muscle physiology and performance. , 1994, Physical therapy.

[31]  J Mizrahi,et al.  A biomechanical model of index finger dynamics. , 1995, Medical engineering & physics.

[32]  R. Raikova.  About weight factors in the non-linear objective functions used for solving indeterminate problems in biomechanics. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  G L Gottlieb,et al.  Muscle activation patterns during two types of voluntary single-joint movement. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  B I Prilutsky,et al.  Is coordination of two-joint leg muscles during load lifting consistent with the strategy of minimum fatigue? , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  T. Hulland.  CHAPTER 2 – Muscle and Tendon , 1993 .

[36]  R Happee,et al.  The control of shoulder muscles during goal directed movements, an inverse dynamic analysis. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[37]  R E Hughes,et al.  Effect of optimization criterion on spinal force estimates during asymmetric lifting. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[38]  A G Feldman,et al.  Moment arms and lengths of human upper limb muscles as functions of joint angles. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[39]  R. Raikova,et al.  Prediction of Individual Muscle Forces Using Lagrange Multipliers Method — A Model of the Upper Human Limb in the Sagittal Plane: I. Theoretical Considerations , 2000, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[40]  T Gordon,et al.  Fast-to-slow conversion following chronic low-frequency activation of medial gastrocnemius muscle in cats. I. Muscle and motor unit properties. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  Gerald L. Gottlieb,et al.  The generation of the efferent command and the importance of joint compliance in fast elbow movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  R. Burke.  Chapter 15 Revisiting the Notion of ‘motor unit types’ , 1999 .

[43]  Sam Kwong,et al.  Genetic Algorithms : Concepts and Designs , 1998 .

[44]  R. Burke.  Revisiting the notion of 'motor unit types'. , 1999, Progress in brain research.

[45]  H. Hatze,et al.  A myocybernetic control model of skeletal muscle , 1977, Biological Cybernetics.

[46]  J. Cooke,et al.  Influence of joint interactional effects on the coordination of planar two-joint arm movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[47]  G. Loeb,et al.  Measured and modeled properties of mammalian skeletal muscle. I. The effects of post-activation potentiation on the time course and velocity dependencies of force production , 1999, Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility.

[48]  M. Latash.  Control of fast elbow movement: a study of electromyographic patterns during movements against unexpectedly decreased inertial load , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[49]  Jacob Rosen,et al.  Performances of Hill-Type and Neural Network Muscle Models - Toward a Myosignal-Based Exoskeleton , 1999, Comput. Biomed. Res..

[50]  Kosterin Sa,et al.  [Kinetic analysis of contraction-relaxation process in smooth muscles]. , 1990 .

[51]  B I Prilutsky,et al.  Analysis of muscle coordination strategies in cycling. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[52]  Zeynep Erim,et al.  Common drive of motor units in regulation of muscle force , 1994, Trends in Neurosciences.

[53]  R E Barr,et al.  Development and evaluation of a musculoskeletal model of the elbow joint complex. , 1996, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[54]  E Viikari-Juntura,et al.  Load-sharing patterns in the shoulder during isometric flexion tasks. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[55]  P. Crago,et al.  A dynamic model for simulating movements of the elbow, forearm, an wrist. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[56]  M. Johnson,et al.  Data on the distribution of fibre types in thirty-six human muscles. An autopsy study. , 1973, Journal of the neurological sciences.

[57]  Stefan Schaal,et al.  Learning passive motor control strategies with genetic algorithms , 1993 .

[58]  Ian E. Brown,et al.  Virtual muscle: a computational approach to understanding the effects of muscle properties on motor control , 2000, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.