Self-report of transportation noise exposure, annoyance and noise sensitivity in relation to noise map information

Self-report of noise exposure was compared with the information on noise maps while taking into account measures of self-reported annoyance and noise sensitivity. Self-report data were analyzed for 1495 subjects participating in a case-control study of hypertension from the Finnish Twin Cohort who had replied to a questionnaire in 1988. In addition, noise map information was included in analyses of the 218 study subjects living in the Metropolitan Area of Helsinki. The results show that: (1) In the factor analysis based on all subjects self-report of transportation noise exposure formed an own factor independent of the annoyance variables or noise sensitivity. Annoyance items loaded on to two different factors termed nighttime and daytime annoyance. Noise sensitivity did not load to either of the factors of annoyance. For the subsample with noise map information, the results indicated that: (2) Noise sensitivity was independent of noise map information. (3) Subjects with high noise sensitivity reported more transportation noise exposure than subjects with low noise sensitivity and they reported aircraft, railway and road traffic noise exposure outside the environmental noise map areas almost twice as often as non-sensitive subjects. (4) Noise map information and self-report of noise exposure were consistently associated when aircraft noise was considered. Self-report of noise related items may supplement noise map information in noise protection.

[1]  W. P. Dixon,et al.  BMPD statistical software manual , 1988 .

[2]  R Rylander,et al.  Dose-response relationships for traffic noise and annoyance. , 1986, Archives of environmental health.

[3]  Neil D. Weinstein,et al.  Individual differences in critical tendencies and noise annoyance , 1980 .

[4]  S Fidell,et al.  Aircraft noise annoyance at three joint air carrier and general aviation airports. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  M. Vallet,et al.  Patterns of behaviour in dwellings exposed to road traffic noise , 1984 .

[6]  Gary W. Heinke,et al.  Environmental Science and Engineering , 1989 .

[7]  Fred L. Hall,et al.  Direct comparison of community response to road traffic noise and to aircraft noise , 1981 .

[8]  T. J. Schultz Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  J. Kaprio,et al.  Hypertension in master endurance athletes , 1998, Journal of hypertension.

[10]  Birgitta Berglund,et al.  Adverse effects of aircraft noise , 1990 .

[11]  M. Björkman Community noise annoyance: Importance of noise levels and the number of noise events , 1991 .

[12]  N. Weinstein Individual differences in reactions to noise: a longitudinal study in a college dormitory. , 1978, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  Alvan R. Feinstein,et al.  Multivariable Analysis: An Introduction , 1996 .

[14]  S. Stansfeld,et al.  Noise, noise sensitivity and psychiatric disorder: epidemiological and psychophysiological studies. , 1993, Psychological medicine.

[15]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[16]  J. Kaprio,et al.  The Finnish Twin Registry: formation and compilation, questionnaire study, zygosity determination procedures, and research program. , 1978, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[17]  M. Koskenvuo,et al.  Recent interpersonal conflict at work and psychiatric morbidity: a prospective study of 15,530 employees aged 24-64. , 1996, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[18]  I. D. Griffiths,et al.  Individual differences in sensitivity to traffic noise: An empirical study , 1977 .

[19]  Birgitta Berglund,et al.  A study of response criteria in populations exposed to aircraft noise , 1975 .

[20]  M. Björkman,et al.  Noise annoyance with regard to neurophysiological sensitivity, subjective noise sensitivity and personality variables , 1988, Psychological Medicine.

[21]  Ragnar Rylander,et al.  Noise sensitivity and road traffic annoyance in a population sample , 1991 .

[22]  R. Guski,et al.  THE CONCEPT OF NOISE ANNOYANCE: HOW INTERNATIONAL EXPERTS SEE IT , 1999 .

[23]  G. J. Raw,et al.  INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN RESPONSE TO ROAD TRAFFIC NOISE , 1988 .

[24]  P. Knipschild,et al.  Road traffic noise annoyance in Amsterdam , 1985, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[25]  J. Gallacher,et al.  Road traffic noise, noise sensitivity and psychological disorder , 1993, Psychological Medicine.

[26]  F L Hall Community response to noise: is all noise the same? , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.