Expanding depth of focus by modifying higher‐order aberrations induced by an adaptive optics visual simulator

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of higher‐order aberrations on depth of focus using an adaptive optics visual simulator. SETTING: Refractive Surgery Department, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. METHODS: An adaptive optics simulator was used to optically introduce individual aberrations in eyes of subjects with a 6.0 mm pupil under cycloplegia (coma and trefoil, magnitudes ±0.3 μm; spherical aberration, magnitudes ±0.3, ±0.6, ±0.9 μm). A through‐focus response curve was assessed by recording the percentage of Sloan letters at a fixed size identified at various target distances. The subject's ocular depth of focus and center of focus were computed as the half‐maximum width and the midpoint of the through‐focus response curve. RESULTS: The dominant eyes of 10 subjects were evaluated. The simulation of positive or negative spherical aberration had the effect of enhancing depth of focus and resulted in linearly shifting of the center of focus by 2.6 diopters (D)/μm of error. This increase in depth of focus reached a maximum of approximately 2.0 D with 0.6 μm of spherical aberration and became smaller when the aberration was increased to 0.9 μm. Trefoil and coma appeared to neither shift the center of focus nor significantly modify the depth of focus. CONCLUSION: The introduction of both positive and negative spherical aberration using adaptive optics technology significantly shifted and expanded the subject's overall depth of focus; simulating coma or trefoil did not produce such effects.

[1]  D R Williams,et al.  Supernormal vision and high-resolution retinal imaging through adaptive optics. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[2]  Pablo Artal,et al.  Adaptive optics visual simulator. , 2002, Journal of refractive surgery.

[3]  Angelika Unterhuber,et al.  Adaptive optics with a magnetic deformable mirror: applications in the human eye. , 2006, Optics express.

[4]  E. Sarver,et al.  Schematic eye models for simulation of patient visual performance. , 2001, Journal of refractive surgery.

[5]  N M Jansonius,et al.  Spherical and irregular aberrations are important for the optimal performance of the human eye , 2002, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[6]  E. Sarver,et al.  Interaction between aberrations to improve or reduce visual performance , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[7]  K. Rocha,et al.  Higher‐order aberrations of age‐related cataract , 2007, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[8]  Sudi Patel,et al.  Evidence for delayed presbyopia after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. , 2006, Ophthalmology.

[9]  David R Williams,et al.  Accommodation with higher-order monochromatic aberrations corrected with adaptive optics. , 2006, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[10]  M. Campbell,et al.  Presbyopia and the optical changes in the human crystalline lens with age , 1998, Vision Research.

[11]  Eduardo Tepichín,et al.  Objective quality of vision in presbyopic and non-presbyopic patients after pseudoaccommodative advanced surface ablation. , 2005, Journal of refractive surgery.

[12]  D Williams,et al.  Visual benefit of correcting higher order aberrations of the eye. , 2000, Journal of refractive surgery.

[13]  Austin Roorda,et al.  A population study on changes in wave aberrations with accommodation. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[14]  Pablo Artal,et al.  Adaptive optics simulation of intraocular lenses with modified spherical aberration. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  Kazunori Miyata,et al.  Age-related changes in corneal and ocular higher-order wavefront aberrations. , 2004, American journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  Sergio Barbero,et al.  Optical quality and depth-of-field of eyes implanted with spherical and aspheric intraocular lenses. , 2005, Journal of refractive surgery.

[17]  K. Alexander,et al.  Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity for Individual Sloan Letters , 1997, Vision Research.

[18]  C. McGhee,et al.  Higher‐order aberrations of lenticular opacities , 2004, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[19]  Geunyoung Yoon,et al.  Correcting highly aberrated eyes using large-stroke adaptive optics. , 2007, Journal of refractive surgery.

[20]  S A Burns,et al.  Age-related changes in monochromatic wave aberrations of the human eye. , 2001, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[21]  Adrian Glasser,et al.  Wave aberrations of the isolated crystalline lens. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[22]  Walton Nosé,et al.  Spherical aberration and depth of focus in eyes implanted with aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses: a prospective randomized study. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[23]  Huanqing Guo,et al.  Changes in through-focus spatial visual performance with adaptive optics correction of monochromatic aberrations , 2008, Vision Research.

[24]  Nicolas Chateau,et al.  Effects of Zernike wavefront aberrations on visual acuity measured using electromagnetic adaptive optics technology. , 2007, Journal of refractive surgery.

[25]  F L Ferris,et al.  Relative letter and position difficulty on visual acuity charts from the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study. , 1993, American journal of ophthalmology.