Relational diversity affects ease of processing even for opaque English compounds

Recent research has indicated that understanding compound words involves an attempt at semantic composition of the constituent words, and that this meaning construction process involves an attempt to identify a relation linking the constituents. Research with novel compounds, where a meaning construction process is necessary, has shown that relational interpretations compete to be selected during comprehension, and that increased competition leads to increased processing difficulty. The current project investigates relational competition during the processing of transparent and opaque English compounds. The results show that the diversity of possible relational interpretations affects the ease with which participants can make a lexical decision for a compound. This is true even for opaque compounds, where the identification of the meaning of the compound cannot, by definition, be the result of the meaning construction process. This suggests that initiation of the meaning construction process is obligatory during compound processing.

[1]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generator , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[2]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Benefits and costs of lexical decomposition and semantic integration during the processing of transparent and opaque English compounds , 2011 .

[3]  Christina L Gagné,et al.  CARIN theory reanalysis reanalyzed: a comment on Maguire, Devereux, Costello, and Cater (2007). , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  R. Baayen,et al.  Reading polymorphemic Dutch compounds: toward a multiple route model of lexical processing. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Does s now man prime plastic snow ?: The effect of constituent position in using relational information during the interpretation of modifier-noun phrases , 2009 .

[6]  David Poeppel,et al.  Compound words and structure in the lexicon , 2007 .

[7]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Influence of Thematic Relations on the Comprehension of Modifier–noun Combinations , 1997 .

[8]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[9]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Relation priming in established compounds: facilitation? , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[10]  Victor Kuperman,et al.  Processing trade-offs in the reading of Dutch derived words , 2010 .

[11]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Constituent integration during the processing of compound words: Does it involve the use of relational structures? , 2009 .

[12]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Regular morphology and the lexicon. , 1995 .

[13]  Pienie Zwitserlood,et al.  The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds , 1994 .

[14]  Dominiek Sandra,et al.  On the Representation and Processing of Compound Words: Automatic Access to Constituent Morphemes Does Not Occur , 1990 .