Expressing technological metaphors in dance using structural illusion from embodied motion

We illustrate how technology has influenced creative, embodied practices in urban dance styles by analyzing how technological metaphors underlie conceptual representations of the body, space, and movement in three related styles of urban dance: liquid, digitz, and finger tutting. The creative and technical embodied practices of urban dancers are not well understood in either the ethnographic or creative movement scholarly literature. Following an exploratory netnography of movement practitioners, we claim that unlike most dancers of traditional genres or other urban dance styles, dancers of these three styles frequently employ representations of the body and of space that are geometrical, mathematical, mechanical, or digital. To explain how viewers perceive and understand these metaphors, we extend the perceptual theory of structure from motion in order to apply dance performance reception theory to a model we call 'Structural Illusion from Embodied Motion' (SIEM). Our analysis of performance techniques of these styles suggests that during performance, dancers leverage SIEM to represent two types of 'illusions' to viewers: a) the dancer's body has a reconfigurable structure; and b) the dancer is immersed in a virtual environment that contains invisible, mutable objects and structures that are revealed only through the dancer's movement. The three dance styles exemplify a trend in popular dance in which body, space, and time are understood in the language of technology.

[1]  J. Rutter,et al.  Ballet and Modern Dance , 1988 .

[2]  Petra Jansen,et al.  The Relationship between Coordination Skill and Mental Rotation Ability , 2012, Spatial Cognition.

[3]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display , 1977 .

[4]  Colin Ware,et al.  Information Visualization: Perception for Design , 2000 .

[5]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[6]  Luis-Manuel Garcia On and On: Repetition as Process and Pleasure in Electronic Dance Music , 2005 .

[7]  Peggy Hackney,et al.  Making Connections: Total Body Integration Through Bartenieff Fundamentals , 1996 .

[8]  S. Ullman,et al.  The interpretation of visual motion , 1977 .

[9]  Thecla Schiphorst,et al.  Scuddle: Generating Movement Catalysts for Computer-Aided Choreography , 2011, ICCC.

[10]  Matthew Reason,et al.  Kinesthesia, Empathy, and Related Pleasures: An Inquiry into Audience Experiences of Watching Dance , 2010, Dance Research Journal.

[11]  Jake K. Aggarwal,et al.  Human motion: modeling and recognition of actions and interactions , 2004, Proceedings. 2nd International Symposium on 3D Data Processing, Visualization and Transmission, 2004. 3DPVT 2004..

[12]  Mark A. Georgeson,et al.  Visual perception : physiology, psychology, & ecology , 2003 .

[13]  C. Berrol Neuroscience meets dance/movement therapy : Mirror neurons, the therapeutic process and empathy , 2006 .

[14]  Ds Maranan Dance illusioning the cyborg: technological themes in the movement practices and audience perception of three urban dance styles , 2012 .

[15]  Michael J. Martinez,et al.  Cerebral Cortex doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj057 Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published October 12, 2005 The Neural Basis of Human Dance , 2022 .

[16]  Chris Webster Animation: The Mechanics of Motion , 2005 .

[17]  Richard Shusterman,et al.  Body Consciousness: A Philosophy of Mindfulness and Somaesthetics , 2008, The Journal of Speculative Philosophy.