Comparing modalities and feedback for peripheral interaction

When executing one task on a computer, we are frequently confronted with secondary tasks (e.g., controlling an audio player or changing the IM state) that require shifting our attention away from the actual task, thus increasing our cognitive load. Peripheral interaction aims at reducing that cognitive load through the use of the periphery of our attention for interaction. In previous work, token- or tag-based systems alongside wearable and graspable devices were the dominant way of interacting in the periphery. We explore touch and freehand interaction in combination with several forms of visual feedback. In a dual-task lab study we found that those additional modalities are fit for peripheral interaction. Also, feedback did not have a measurable influence, yet it assured participants in their actions.

[1]  Xiaobin Shen,et al.  An Evaluation Methodology for Ambient Displays , 2007 .

[2]  Andreas Butz,et al.  StaTube: facilitating state management in instant messaging systems , 2012, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[3]  Alan F. Blackwell,et al.  Peripheral tangible interaction by analytic design , 2009, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[4]  Elise van den Hoven,et al.  Exploring peripheral interaction design for primary school teachers , 2012, TEI.

[5]  Andreas Butz,et al.  Exploring Design and Combination of Ambient Information and Peripheral Interaction , 2012 .

[6]  Ian Oakley,et al.  Designing Eyes-Free Interaction , 2007, HAID.

[7]  Stephan Wensveen,et al.  Interaction frogger: a design framework to couple action and function through feedback and feedforward , 2004, DIS '04.

[8]  Pablo Llinás,et al.  Do Not Disturb: Physical Interfaces for Parallel Peripheral Interactions , 2011, INTERACT.

[9]  Florian Block,et al.  Touch-display keyboards: transforming keyboards into interactive surfaces , 2010, CHI.

[10]  John T. Stasko,et al.  A taxonomy of ambient information systems: four patterns of design , 2006, AVI '06.

[11]  Thomas Jackson,et al.  The cost of email interruption , 2001, Journal of Systems and Information Technology.

[12]  Elise van den Hoven,et al.  FireFlies: supporting primary school teachers through open-ended interaction design , 2012, OZCHI.

[13]  Michael Rohs,et al.  A Taxonomy of Microinteractions: Defining Microgestures Based on Ergonomic and Scenario-Dependent Requirements , 2011, INTERACT.

[14]  E. M. Altmann,et al.  Task Interruption: Resumption Lag and the Role of Cues , 2004 .