Collective decision-making in complex situations: a dynamic role in alert management

Motivation - This paper presents collective processes analysis in command and control activities. Research approach - Our objective is to describe the collective activities during alert management situations using the EORCA method (Event Oriented Representation of Collaborative Activities). Findings/Design -Data analysis allows us to characterize different interindividual processes: co-operation and collaboration. Results show that they consist mainly in primarily communication procedures between experts during the varying phases of about management. Research limitations/Implications - Only one setting (epidemiological alert management) was investigated in this study, which limited a possible generalisation of the findings. Originality/Value - The research makes a contribution to the need of designers to target specific collective processes used in alert management by creating specific design for crisis centre. Take away message - Different team activity processes occur during the course of action in alert management, which correspond to specific phases: cooperation during information elements acquisition; collaboration during situation assessment and decision making phases.

[1]  Liliane Pellegrin,et al.  Web Services Based Syndromic Surveillance for Early Warning within French Forces , 2006, MIE.

[2]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge" in the psychology of computer vision , 1975 .

[3]  J. Hoc,et al.  Diagnostic et prise de décision dans les situations dynamiques , 1994 .

[4]  David Woods,et al.  1. How to make automated systems team players , 2002 .

[5]  Hervé Chaudet,et al.  Extending the event calculus for tracking epidemic spread , 2006, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[6]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Cognitive Systems Engineering , 2022 .

[7]  Laurence Rognin,et al.  Cooperation, reliability of socio-technical systems and allocation of function , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[8]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Sweetening Ontologies with DOLCE , 2002, EKAW.

[9]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Measuring Team Knowledge , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[10]  Pat-Anthony Federico,et al.  Expert and Novice Recognition of Similar Situations , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[11]  T. Connolly,et al.  The reinvention of decision making. , 1993 .

[12]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Measurement of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[13]  N. Bonnardel,et al.  Event Oriented Representation for Collaborative Activities (EORCA) , 2007, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[14]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .

[15]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Joint Cognitive Systems: Foundations of Cognitive Systems Engineering , 2005 .

[16]  Klas Wallenius,et al.  A Generic Model of Management and Command and Control , 2002 .

[17]  G. Klein,et al.  Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods , 1993 .

[18]  J. Leplat,et al.  Collective activity in work: some lines of research , 1994 .

[19]  J. Leplat,et al.  Statut et fonction des communications dans l'activité des équipes de travail , 1983 .

[20]  Laurent Karsenty,et al.  Différents niveaux d'analyse du contexte dans l'étude ergonomique du travail collectif , 1997 .

[21]  Patrick Henry Winston,et al.  The psychology of computer vision , 1976, Pattern Recognit..