Autonomous Landmark Calibration Method for Indoor Localization

Machine-generated data expansion is a global phenomenon in recent Internet services. The proliferation of mobile communication and smart devices has increased the utilization of machine-generated data significantly. One of the most promising applications of machine-generated data is the estimation of the location of smart devices. The motion sensors integrated into smart devices generate continuous data that can be used to estimate the location of pedestrians in an indoor environment. We focus on the estimation of the accurate location of smart devices by determining the landmarks appropriately for location error calibration. In the motion sensor-based location estimation, the proposed threshold control method determines valid landmarks in real time to avoid the accumulation of errors. A statistical method analyzes the acquired motion sensor data and proposes a valid landmark for every movement of the smart devices. Motion sensor data used in the testbed are collected from the actual measurements taken throughout a commercial building to demonstrate the practical usefulness of the proposed method.

[1]  Fernando Seco,et al.  A survey of mathematical methods for indoor localization , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing.

[2]  Peter Martini,et al.  Indoor tracking for mission critical scenarios: A survey , 2011, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[3]  Philipp Müller,et al.  A field test of parametric WLAN-fingerprint-positioning methods , 2014, 17th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION).

[4]  Jie Yang,et al.  Push the limit of WiFi based localization for smartphones , 2012, Mobicom '12.

[5]  Miljenko Huzak,et al.  Chi-Square Distribution , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[6]  Jie Yang,et al.  Accurate WiFi Based Localization for Smartphones Using Peer Assistance , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[7]  Andrei Szabo,et al.  WLAN-Based Pedestrian Tracking Using Particle Filters and Low-Cost MEMS Sensors , 2007, 2007 4th Workshop on Positioning, Navigation and Communication.

[8]  Yan Yan,et al.  A Fast 3D Indoor-Localization Approach Based on Video Queries , 2016, MMM.

[9]  F. Seco,et al.  A comparison of Pedestrian Dead-Reckoning algorithms using a low-cost MEMS IMU , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing.

[10]  Robert Harle,et al.  A Survey of Indoor Inertial Positioning Systems for Pedestrians , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[11]  Valerie Renaudin,et al.  Quaternion based heading estimation with handheld MEMS in indoor environments , 2014, 2014 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium - PLANS 2014.

[12]  Ignas Niemegeers,et al.  A survey of indoor positioning systems for wireless personal networks , 2009, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[13]  Jiming Chen,et al.  Gradient-Based Fingerprinting for Indoor Localization and Tracking , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[14]  Raúl Montoliu,et al.  Providing Databases for Different Indoor Positioning Technologies: Pros and Cons of Magnetic Field and Wi-Fi Based Positioning , 2016, Mob. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Nicu Sebe,et al.  Knowing Where I Am: Exploiting Multi-Task Learning for Multi-view Indoor Image-based Localization , 2014, BMVC.

[16]  Valérie Renaudin,et al.  Comparison of misalignment estimation techniques between handheld device and walking directions , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN).

[17]  Itziar G. Alonso-González,et al.  A Low Complexity System Based on Multiple Weighted Decision Trees for Indoor Localization , 2015, Sensors.

[18]  Moustafa Youssef,et al.  The Horus WLAN location determination system , 2005, MobiSys '05.

[19]  M. Kendall Statistical Methods for Research Workers , 1937, Nature.

[20]  Janne Haverinen,et al.  Global indoor self-localization based on the ambient magnetic field , 2009, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[21]  Feng Yu,et al.  An Improved Indoor Localization of WiFiBased on Support Vector Machines , 2014 .

[22]  Ram Dantu,et al.  Magnetic Maps for Indoor Navigation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[23]  Ville Kaseva,et al.  Positioning with coverage area estimates generated from location fingerprints , 2010, 2010 7th Workshop on Positioning, Navigation and Communication.

[24]  Xiaolong Xu,et al.  Exponentially Weighted Particle Filter for Simultaneous Localization and Mapping Based on Magnetic Field Measurements , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[25]  Mahbub Hassan,et al.  A collaborative approach to heading estimation for smartphone-based PDR indoor localisation , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN).

[26]  Gennady Berkovich Accurate and reliable real-time indoor positioning on commercial smartphones , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN).

[27]  Rajesh Rajamani,et al.  Adaptive Dipole Model Based Disturbance Compensation in Nonlinear Magnetic Position Systems , 2017, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[28]  H. Haas,et al.  Pedestrian Dead Reckoning : A Basis for Personal Positioning , 2006 .

[29]  Guobin Shen,et al.  Magicol: Indoor Localization Using Pervasive Magnetic Field and Opportunistic WiFi Sensing , 2015, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[30]  Henry Tirri,et al.  A Probabilistic Approach to WLAN User Location Estimation , 2002, Int. J. Wirel. Inf. Networks.

[31]  Romit Roy Choudhury,et al.  Unsupervised Indoor Localization , 2012 .

[32]  Yufeng,et al.  An Improved Indoor Localization of WiFiBased on Support Vector Machines , 2014 .

[33]  Patrick Robertson,et al.  Development and Evaluation of a Combined WLAN and Inertial Indoor Pedestrian Positioning System , 2009 .