Soot and NO formation in methane-oxygen enriched diffusion flames

NO and soot formation were investigated both numerically and experimentally in oxygen-enriched counterflow diffusion flames. Two sets of experiments were conducted. In the first set, the soot volume fraction was measured as a function of oxygen content in the oxidizer jet at constant strain rate (20 s−1). In the second set of experiments, the soot volume fraction was measured as a function of strain rate variation from 10 to 60 s−1 and at constant oxygen content on the oxidizer side. A soot model was developed based on a detailed C6 gas phase chemistry. The soot and molecular radiation were taken into account. Numerical results were verified against experimental data. The soot volume fraction was predicted with the maximum discrepancy less than 30% for all cases considered. It was found that oxygen variation significantly modified the diffusion flame structure and the flame temperature, resulting in a substantial increase of soot. The temperature increase promotes aromatics production in the fuel pyrolysis zone and changes the relative contributions of the thermal and Fenimore mechanisms into NO formation. As the strain rate increases, the residence time of incipient soot particles in the high temperature zone is reduced and the total amount of soot decreases. High concentration of soot in the flame leads to enhancement of radiant heat exchange: the reduction of temperature due to radiation was found to be between 10 and 50 K. This caused a reduction of peak NO concentrations by 20%–25%. The increase of oxygen content in the oxidizer stream resulted in a reduction of the distance between the plane of the maximum temperature and the stagnation plane.

[1]  I. Puri,et al.  Experimental investigation of stretched premixed flames burning mixtures of methane and methyl chloride in air and comparison with numerical simulations , 1993 .

[2]  Forman A. Williams,et al.  NOx formation in two-stage methane–air flames , 1999 .

[3]  C. Sung,et al.  Structural response of counterflow diffusion flames to strain rate variations , 1995 .

[4]  Suk Ho Chung,et al.  Soot zone structure and sooting limit in diffusion flames: Comparison of counterflow and co-flow flames , 1997 .

[5]  G. Faeth,et al.  Effects of Hydrodynamics on Soot Formation in Laminar Opposed-Jet Diffusion Flames , 1996 .

[6]  G. Faeth,et al.  Soot formation in hydrocarbon/air laminar jet diffusion flames☆ , 1996 .

[7]  Henning Bockhorn,et al.  Soot Formation in Combustion: Mechanisms and Models , 1994 .

[8]  Michael Frenklach,et al.  Detailed Modeling of PAH Profiles in a Sooting Low-Pressure Acetylene Flame , 1987 .

[9]  Ian M. Kennedy,et al.  Models of soot formation and oxidation , 1997 .

[10]  K. M. Leung,et al.  A simplified reaction mechanism for soot formation in nonpremixed flames , 1991 .

[11]  James A. Miller,et al.  Mechanism and modeling of nitrogen chemistry in combustion , 1989 .

[12]  Robert J. Santoro,et al.  The oxidation of soot and carbon monoxide in hydrocarbon diffusion flames , 1994 .

[13]  Kermit C. Smyth,et al.  NO Production and Destruction in a Methane/Air Diffusion Flame , 1996 .

[14]  Ian M. Kennedy,et al.  Sooting Counterflow Diffusion Flames with Varying Oxygen Index , 1984 .

[15]  A. Fridman,et al.  Relative effect of acetylene and PAHs addition on soot formation in laminar diffusion flames of methane with oxygen and oxygen-enriched air , 2000 .

[16]  E. Djavdan,et al.  A comparison between weighted sum of gray gases and statistical narrow-band radiation models for combustion applications , 1994 .

[17]  P. R. Westmoreland,et al.  Forming benzene in flames by chemically activated isomerization , 1989 .

[18]  K. M. Leung,et al.  Detailed Kinetic Modeling of C, - C, Alkane Diffusion Flames , 1995 .

[19]  K. Sattler,et al.  Reactive Dimerization: A New PAH Growth Mechanism in Flames , 1995 .

[20]  Antonio M. Vincitore,et al.  Experimental Studies of the Micro-Structures of Opposed Flow Diffusion Flames: Methane , 1997 .

[21]  C. Sung,et al.  On the structure of nonsooting counterflow ethylene and acetylene diffusion flames , 1996 .

[22]  M. Modest.  The weighted-sum-of-gray-gases model for arbitrary solution methods in radiative transfer , 1991 .

[23]  C. Law,et al.  Soot Formation in Counterflow Ethylene Diffusion Flames from 1 to 2.5 Atmospheres , 1998 .

[24]  Andrew E. Lutz,et al.  OPPDIF: A Fortran program for computing opposed-flow diffusion flames , 1997 .

[25]  S. Turns.  An Introduction to Combustion: Concepts and Applications , 2000 .

[26]  Henning Bockhorn,et al.  Soot Formation in Combustion , 1994 .

[27]  David E. Keyes,et al.  A Comparison Between Numerical Calculations and Experimental Measurements of the Structure of a Counterflow Methane-Air Diffusion Flame , 1987 .

[28]  Robert J. Kee,et al.  A FORTRAN COMPUTER CODE PACKAGE FOR THE EVALUATION OF GAS-PHASE, MULTICOMPONENT TRANSPORT PROPERTIES , 1986 .

[29]  V. Babushok,et al.  Premixed carbon monoxide–nitrous oxide–hydrogen flames: measured and calculated burning velocities with and without Fe(CO)5 , 2000 .

[30]  Robert J. Santoro,et al.  The Transport and Growth of Soot Particles in Laminar Diffusion Flames , 1987 .

[31]  J. Longwell,et al.  Benzene destruction in fuel-rich jet-stirred reactor combustion , 1991 .

[32]  M. Frenklach,et al.  A detailed kinetic modeling study of aromatics formation in laminar premixed acetylene and ethylene flames , 1997 .

[33]  James A. Miller,et al.  Kinetic and thermodynamic issues in the formation of aromatic compounds in flames of aliphatic fuels , 1992 .

[34]  Ishwar K. Puri,et al.  Extinction of diffusion flames burning diluted methane and diluted propane in diluted air , 1986 .

[35]  J. Kent,et al.  Soot measurements in laminar ethylene diffusion flames , 1982 .

[36]  M. Pinar Mengüç,et al.  Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer , 2020 .