Reinforcing Properties of Escape From Frustration Aroused In Various Learning Situations

Publisher Summary This chapter summarizes research from various learning situations involving reward manipulations in which frustration is typically introduced to account for the results. These researches provides empirical support for the frustration interpretation by using an escape-from-frustration response to measure independently the relative amounts of frustration present. The experiments presented in these researches indicate that the subjects learn a new response to escape from frustration-arousing stimuli. They also demonstrate that rats learn a hurdle-jump response to escape stimuli paired with nonreward or a reduced reward previously paired with a large reward. This result is obtained under various conditions and learning situations, such as following alley acquisition or direct placements on a continuous reinforcement schedule with solid food or sucrose rewards, in combination with stimuli paired with shock or with an increase in delay of reward, and following alley acquisition on a partial or varied reinforcement schedule. These experiments also demonstrate that the amount of discrimination training influences escape behavior from both S+ and S–, and that the stimuli associated with the absence of an “observing response” are more aversive than the stimuli associated with the presence of an “observing response.”

[1]  R. Wilton The role of information in the emission of observing responses and partial reinforcement acquisition phenomena , 1972 .

[2]  G. McCain Different levels of performance with equivalent weights of reward , 1969 .

[3]  E. Zamble Classical conditioning of excitement anticipatory to food reward. , 1967 .

[4]  C. I. Brooks Frustration considerations of the small-trials partial reinforcement effect: experience with nonreward and intertrial reinforcement. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  J. Cohen Drive level effects on the conditioning of frustration. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  J. Ison,et al.  Amobarbital sodium and instrumental performance changes following reward reduction , 1967 .

[7]  H. B. Daly Combined effects of fear and frustration on acquisition of a hurdle-jump response. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  H. B. Daly Aversive properties of partial and varied reinforcement during runway acquisition. , 1969 .

[9]  H. B. Daly Evidence for frustation during discrimination learning. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  H. B. Daly Learning of a hurdle-jump response to escape cues paired with reduced reward or frustrative nonreward. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  N. Miller,et al.  Effects of alcohol and amobarbital on performance inhibited by experimental extinction. , 1962, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[12]  A. R. Wagner Conditioned frustration as a learned drive. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  C. I. Brooks Frustration to nonreward following limited reward experience. , 1969 .

[14]  H. Ludvigson,et al.  Frustration Effect as a Function of Drive , 1964 .

[15]  M. Shanab Positive transfer between nonreward and delay. , 1971 .

[16]  H. B. Daly,et al.  Acquisition of a bar-press response to escape frustrative nonreward and reduced reward. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  H. B. Daly Hurdle jumping from S+ following discrimination and reversal training: a frustration analysis of the ORE. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  H. B. Daly Arousal of frustration following gradual reductions in reward magnitude in rats. , 1974, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[19]  L. Crespi Quantitative variation of incentive and performance in the white rat. , 1942 .

[20]  D. E. Mcallister,et al.  Postconditioning delay and intensity of shock as factors in the measurement of acquired fear , 1962 .

[21]  E. Capaldi A Sequential Hypothesis of Instrumental Learning1 , 1967 .

[22]  M. Rilling,et al.  Aversive properties of the negative stimulus in a successive discrimination. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[23]  S. E. Sperling The ore in simultaneous and differential reversal: Acquisition task, acquisition criterion, and reversal task. , 1970 .

[24]  W. F. Prokasy,et al.  The acquisition of observing responses in the absence of differential external reinforcement. , 1956, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[25]  A. Amsel,et al.  FRUSTRATION AND PERSISTENCE: RESISTANCE TO DISCRIMINATION FOLLOWING PRIOR EXPERIENCE WITH THE DISCRIMINANDA. , 1964, Psychological monographs.

[26]  H. Terrace Escape from S , 1971 .

[27]  A. Amsel Frustrative nonreward in partial reinforcement and discrimination learning: some recent history and a theoretical extension. , 1962, Psychological review.

[28]  A. Amsel,et al.  Partial Reinforcement Effects On Vigor and Persistence: Advances in Frustration Theory Derived from a Variety of Within-Subjects Experiments1 , 1967 .

[29]  A. Rosen Incentive-shift performance as a function of magnitude and number of sucrose rewards. , 1966 .

[30]  H. Terrace By-Products of Discrimination Learning1 , 1972 .

[31]  A. Amsel The role of frustrative nonreward in noncontinuous reward situations. , 1958, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  Delay of reward in the double alleyway: A within-subjects versus between-groups comparison , 1970 .

[33]  E. Capaldi,et al.  Effect of intertrial reinforcement on the aftereffect of nonreinforcement and resistance to extinction. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  L. Weinstein Negative incentive contrast with sucrose , 1970 .

[35]  M. Shanab,et al.  Effects of shifts in magnitude and delay of reward upon runway performance in the rat , 1970 .

[36]  J. Ison,et al.  Reward magnitude changes following differential conditioning and partial reinforcement , 1969 .

[37]  D. E. Mcallister,et al.  Role of the CS and of Apparatus Cues in the Measurement of Acquired Fear , 1962 .

[38]  J. H. McHose Incentive reduction: Simultaneous delay increase and magnitude reduction and subsequent responding , 1966 .

[39]  R. Patten Frustrative facilitation effects of nonzero reward magnitude reduction on goal-box activity and runway locomotion. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[40]  W. F. Prokasy,et al.  Role of Food Deprivation in the Acquisition of the Observing Response , 1962 .

[41]  H. M. Adelman,et al.  Learning and extinction based upon frustration, food reward, and exploratory tendency. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.

[42]  S. E. Sperling REVERSAL LEARNING AND RESISTANCE TO EXTINCTION: A REVIEW OF THE RAT LITERATURE. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[43]  Wyckoff Lb The role of observing responses in discrimination learning. Part I. , 1952 .

[44]  R. W. Richards,et al.  Aversive properties of the negative stimulus during learning with and without errors , 1973 .

[45]  C. Paul EFFECTS OF OVERLEARNING UPON SINGLE HABIT REVERSAL IN RATS. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[46]  H. B. Daly Learning to escape cues paired with reward reductions following single- or multiple-pellet rewards , 1972 .

[47]  Homzie Mj,et al.  Runway performance following a reduction in the concentration of a liquid reward. , 1962 .

[48]  H. B. Daly Is instrumental responding necessary for nonreward following reward to be frustrating? , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[49]  C. L. Richman,et al.  Undertraining reversal effect in rats , 1970 .

[50]  M. Bitterman,et al.  Some observations on the depression effect. , 1962, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[51]  C. C. Perkins The stimulus conditions which follow learned responses. , 1955, Psychological review.