A regional prehospital electrocardiogram network with a single telecardiology "hub" for public emergency medical service: technical requirements, logistics, manpower, and preliminary results.

BACKGROUND In patients with a major cardiac event, the first priority is to minimize time-to-treatment. For many patients, the first and fastest contact with the health system is through emergency medical services (EMS). However, delay to treatment is still significant in developed countries, and international guidelines therefore recommend that EMS use prehospital electrocardiogram (ECG). Many communities are implementing prehospital ECG programs, with different technical solutions. METHODS We report on a region-wide prehospital ECG telecardiology program that involved 233,657 patients from all over Apulia (4 million inhabitants), Italy, who called the public regional free EMS telephone number "118." Prehospital ECG was transmitted by mobile phone to a single regional telecardiology "hub" where a cardiologist available 24/7 promptly reported the ECG, having a briefing with on-scene EMS personnel and EMS district central; patients were then directed to fibrinolysis or primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as appropriate. RESULTS Patients were >70 years in 51% of cases, and 55% of prehospital ECGs were unremarkable; the remaining 45% showed signs suggesting acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in 18%, arrhythmias in 20%, and minor findings in 62%. In cases of suspected ACS (chest pain), ECG findings were normal in 77% of patients; 74% of subjects with suspected ACS were screened within 30' from the onset of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS A regional single telecardiology hub providing prehospital ECG for a sole regional public EMS provides an example of a prehospital ECG network optimizing quality of ECG report and uniformity of EMS assistance in a large region-wide network.

[1]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Effects of age on the quality of care provided to older patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 2003, The American journal of medicine.

[2]  A. Branzi,et al.  Clinical impact of direct referral to primary percutaneous coronary intervention following pre-hospital diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. , 2006, European heart journal.

[3]  C. Cairns,et al.  Delays in fibrinolysis as primary reperfusion therapy for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. , 2010, American heart journal.

[4]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Implementation and integration of prehospital ECGs into systems of care for acute coronary syndrome: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research, Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Nursi , 2008, Circulation.

[5]  David Brieger,et al.  Extent of, and factors associated with, delay to hospital presentation in patients with acute coronary disease (the GRACE registry). , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  R. Califf,et al.  Relationship between delay in performing direct coronary angioplasty and early clinical outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the global use of strategies to open occluded arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes (GUSTO-IIb) trial. , 1999, Circulation.

[7]  P. Kudenchuk,et al.  Prehospital-initiated vs hospital-initiated thrombolytic therapy. The Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Trial. , 1993, JAMA.

[8]  J S Alpert,et al.  Myocardial infarction redefined--a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  B. Gersh A Citywide Protocol for Primary PCI in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction , 2008 .

[10]  W. Milne,et al.  A door-to-needle time of 30 minutes or less for myocardial infarction thrombolysis is possible in rural emergency departments. , 2008, CJEM.

[11]  Gervasio A. Lamas,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients wi , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  D. Foster,et al.  Prehospital recognition of AMI using independent nurse/paramedic 12-lead ECG evaluation: impact on in-hospital times to thrombolysis in a rural community hospital. , 1994, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[13]  F. Werf,et al.  The European Heart Journal: parting thoughts after 6 years of editorship. , 2008, European heart journal.

[14]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Times to Treatment in Transfer Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States: National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI)-3/4 Analysis , 2005, Circulation.

[15]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  The pre-hospital electrocardiogram and time to reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction, 2000-2002: findings from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-4. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  J. Gurwitz,et al.  Trends in prehospital delay in patients with acute myocardial infarction (from the Worcester Heart Attack Study). , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.

[17]  E. Bedrick,et al.  The prehospital 12-lead electrocardiogram's effect on time to initiation of reperfusion therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing literature. , 2005, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[18]  E. Antman,et al.  ESC COMMITTEE FOR PRACTICE GUIDELINES MEMBERS , 2003 .

[19]  G. Maurer,et al.  Implementation of Guidelines Improves the Standard of Care: The Viennese Registry on Reperfusion Strategies in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Vienna STEMI Registry) , 2006, Circulation.

[20]  T. Aufderheide,et al.  The prehospital 12-lead electrocardiogram: impact on management of the out-of-hospital acute coronary syndrome patient. , 2003, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[21]  Michael Weis,et al.  Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: the Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2008, European heart journal.

[22]  Elliott M. Antman,et al.  Time Delay to Treatment and Mortality in Primary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Every Minute of Delay Counts , 2004, Circulation.

[23]  D. Kent,et al.  Elapsed Time in Emergency Medical Services for Patients With Cardiac Complaints: Are Some Patients at Greater Risk for Delay? , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[24]  C. Granger,et al.  Rationale for establishing regional ST-elevation myocardial infarction receiving center (SRC) networks. , 2006, American heart journal.

[25]  E. Antman,et al.  Evaluation of the time saved by prehospital initiation of reteplase for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: results of The Early Retavase-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (ER-TIMI) 19 trial. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  N. Brunetti,et al.  Telecardiology applied to a region-wide public emergency health-care service , 2009, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis.

[27]  P. Steg,et al.  Impact of Prehospital Thrombolysis for Acute Myocardial Infarction on 1-Year Outcome: Results From the French Nationwide USIC 2000 Registry , 2004, Circulation.

[28]  T. Quinn,et al.  Reduction of treatment delay in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: impact of pre-hospital diagnosis and direct referral to primary percutaneous intervention. , 2005, European heart journal.

[29]  B. Brodie,et al.  Relationship between delay in performing direct coronary angioplasty and early clinical outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, Circulation.

[30]  W. Weaver,et al.  An approach to shorten time to infarct artery patency in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[31]  N. Brunetti,et al.  Telecardiology improves quality of diagnosis and reduces delay to treatment in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction and atypical presentation , 2010, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[32]  K. Anstrom,et al.  Implementation of a statewide system for coronary reperfusion for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. , 2007, JAMA.

[33]  A. Steptoe,et al.  Pre-hospital delay in patients with acute coronary syndrome: Factors associated with patient decision time and home-to-hospital delay , 2009, European journal of cardiovascular nursing : journal of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Nursing of the European Society of Cardiology.

[34]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Time to treatment in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  C. Pozner,et al.  Implications of the mechanical (PCI) vs thrombolytic controversy for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction on the organization of emergency medical services: the Boston EMS experience. , 2004, Critical pathways in cardiology.

[36]  M. Caldwell,et al.  American Heart Association: Council on Cardiovascular Nursing , 2004, The Journal of cardiovascular nursing.

[37]  N. Fowler,et al.  The Electrocardiographic Pattern of Right Ventricular Hypertrophy in Mitral Valve Disease , 1955, Circulation.

[38]  N. Danchin,et al.  Pre-hospital thrombolysis in perspective. , 2008, European heart journal.

[39]  Ori Ben-Yehuda,et al.  Effect of prehospital 12-lead electrocardiogram on activation of the cardiac catheterization laboratory and door-to-balloon time in ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.