Exploiting the “doddington zoo” effect in biometric fusion

Recent research in biometrics has suggested the existence of the “Biometric Menagerie” in which weak users contribute disproportionately to the error rate (FAR and FRR) of a biometric system. The aim of this work is to utilize this observation to design a multibiometric system where information is consolidated on a user-specific basis. To facilitate this, the users in a database are characterized into multiple categories and only users belonging to weak categories are required to provide additional biometric information. The contribution of this work lies in (a) the design of a selective fusion scheme where fusion is invoked only for a subset of users, and (b) evaluating the performance of such a scheme on two public datasets. Experiments on the multi-unit CASIA V3 iris database and multi-unit WVU fingerprint database indicate that selective fusion, as defined in this work, improves overall matching accuracy while potentially reducing overall computational time. This has positive implications in a large-scale system where the throughput can be substantially increased without compromising the verification accuracy of the system.

[1]  Arun Ross,et al.  Information fusion in biometrics , 2003, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[2]  Craig I. Watson,et al.  The Myth of the Goats: How Many People Have Fingerprints that are Hard to Match? | NIST , 2005 .

[3]  Douglas A. Reynolds,et al.  SHEEP, GOATS, LAMBS and WOLVES A Statistical Analysis of Speaker Performance in the NIST 1998 Speaker Recognition Evaluation , 1998 .

[4]  John Daugman,et al.  How iris recognition works , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[5]  Arun Ross,et al.  Iris Segmentation Using Geodesic Active Contours , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[6]  Arun Ross,et al.  Learning user-specific parameters in a multibiometric system , 2002, Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing.

[7]  Patrick J. Flynn,et al.  Empirical Studies of the Existence of the Biometric Menagerie in the FRGC 2.0 Color Image Corpus , 2006, 2006 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop (CVPRW'06).

[8]  Josef Kittler,et al.  A Biometric Menagerie Index for Characterising Template/Model-Specific Variation , 2009, ICB.

[9]  Arun Ross,et al.  Revisiting Doddington"s Zoo: A Systematic Method to Assess User-dependent Variabilities , 2006 .

[10]  Arun Ross,et al.  Multibiometric systems , 2004, CACM.

[11]  Xudong Jiang,et al.  Exploiting global and local decisions for multimodal biometrics verification , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[12]  Krzysztof Kryszczuk,et al.  Improving Classification with Class-Independent Quality Measures: Q-stack in Face Verification , 2007, ICB.

[13]  Arun Ross,et al.  Score normalization in multimodal biometric systems , 2005, Pattern Recognit..

[14]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Likelihood Ratio-Based Biometric Score Fusion , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[15]  J. Kittler,et al.  A methodology for separating sheep from goats for controlled enrollment and multimodal fusion , 2008, 2008 Biometrics Symposium.