Literal, fictive and metaphorical motion sentences preserve the motion component of the verb: A TMS study

We used Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) to assess whether reading literal, non-literal (i.e., metaphorical, idiomatic) and fictive motion sentences modulates the activity of the motor system. Sentences were divided into three segments visually presented one at a time: the noun phrase, the verb and the final part of the sentence. Single pulse-TMS was delivered at the end of the sentence over the leg motor area in the left hemisphere and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the right gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior muscles. MEPs were larger when participants were presented with literal, fictive and metaphorical motion sentences than with idiomatic motion or mental sentences. These results suggest that the excitability of the motor system is modulated by the motor component of the verb, which is preserved in fictive and metaphorical motion sentences.

[1]  Roel M. Willems,et al.  Neural evidence for the interplay between language, gesture, and action: A review , 2007, Brain and Language.

[2]  R. Nebes,et al.  Patterns of Hand Preference in a Student Population , 1975, Cortex.

[3]  Vittorio Gallese,et al.  Listening to Action-related Sentences Activates Fronto-parietal Motor Circuits , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  S. Glucksberg,et al.  Understanding idioms: Do visual images reflect figurative meanings? , 1995 .

[5]  Marco Iacoboni,et al.  Are cortical motor maps based on body parts or coordinated actions? Implications for embodied semantics , 2010, Brain and Language.

[6]  Remco J. Renken,et al.  Evidence for bilateral involvement in idiom comprehension: An fMRI study , 2007, NeuroImage.

[7]  K. Watkins,et al.  Stimulating language: insights from TMS. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  P. Rossini,et al.  Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  F. Pulvermüller,et al.  Grasping Ideas with the Motor System: Semantic Somatotopy in Idiom Comprehension , 2009 .

[10]  Costanza Papagno,et al.  Idiom comprehension in aphasic patients , 2004, Brain and Language.

[11]  Cristina Cacciari,et al.  When Dogs Can Fly: Level of Abstraction as a Cue to Metaphorical Use of Verbs , 2005 .

[12]  Karen Emmorey,et al.  Modulation of BOLD Response in Motion-sensitive Lateral Temporal Cortex by Real and Fictive Motion Sentences , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  Gaspare Galati,et al.  A selective representation of the meaning of actions in the auditory mirror system , 2008, NeuroImage.

[14]  Antonino Vallesi,et al.  Effects of TMS on Different Stages of Motor and Non-Motor Verb Processing in the Primary Motor Cortex , 2009, PloS one.

[15]  B. Mesquita,et al.  Adjustment to Chronic Diseases and Terminal Illness Health Psychology : Psychological Adjustment to Chronic Disease , 2006 .

[16]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Congruent Embodied Representations for Visually Presented Actions and Linguistic Phrases Describing Actions , 2006, Current Biology.

[17]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Brain Signatures of Meaning Access in Action Word Recognition , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  C. Papagno,et al.  Testing idiom comprehension in aphasic patients: The effects of task and idiom type , 2007, Brain and Language.

[19]  Teenie Matlock,et al.  The integration of figurative language and static depictions: An eye movement study of fictive motion , 2007, Cognition.

[20]  S. Cappa,et al.  Idiom comprehension: a prefrontal task? , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  S. Coren The lateral preference inventory for measurement of handedness, footedness, eyedness, and earedness: Norms for young adults , 1993 .

[22]  A. Roepstorff,et al.  Concrete spatial language: See what I mean? , 2005, Brain and Language.

[23]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[24]  B. Greenberg,et al.  Menstrual cycle effects on cortical excitability , 1999, Neurology.

[25]  L. Tyler,et al.  Modulation of motor and premotor cortices by actions, action words and action sentences , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  Michael C. Ridding,et al.  Factors influencing the magnitude and reproducibility of corticomotor excitability changes induced by paired associative stimulation , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  T. Rogers,et al.  Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[28]  Anna M. Thornton,et al.  Corpus e Lessico di frequenza dell’Italiano Scritto (CoLFIS). , 2005 .

[29]  T. Matlock Fictive motion as cognitive simulation , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[30]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: a combined TMS and behavioral study. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[31]  Arthur M. Glenberg,et al.  Indexical understanding of instructions , 1999 .

[32]  S. Rossi,et al.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[33]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Embodied Language: A Review of the Role of the Motor System in Language Comprehension , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  O. Hauk,et al.  Neurophysiological distinction of action words in the fronto‐central cortex , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[35]  Page Widick,et al.  Functional–anatomical organization of predicate metaphor processing , 2008, Brain and Language.

[36]  L. Fadiga,et al.  Active perception: sensorimotor circuits as a cortical basis for language , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[37]  Sian L. Beilock,et al.  Sports experience changes the neural processing of action language , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Katie L. McMahon,et al.  Action word meaning representations in cytoarchitectonically defined primary and premotor cortices , 2008, NeuroImage.

[39]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Processing Abstract Language Modulates Motor System Activity , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[40]  B L Day,et al.  Some experiences of techniques for stimulation of the human cerebral motor cortex through the scalp. , 1987, Neurosurgery.

[41]  L. Talmy Toward a Cognitive Semantics , 2003 .

[42]  C. Cacciari,et al.  Exploring the relationship between individuals’ speed of processing and their comprehension of spoken idioms , 2007 .

[43]  Marco Tettamanti,et al.  Semantic domain-specific functional integration for action-related vs. abstract concepts , 2010, Brain and Language.