Semantic relations differentially impact associative recognition memory: Electrophysiological evidence

Though associative recognition memory is thought to rely primarily on recollection, recent research indicates that familiarity might also make a substantial contribution when to-be-learned items are integrated into a coherent structure by means of an existing semantic relation. It remains unclear how different types of semantic relations, such as categorical (e.g., dancer-singer) and thematic (e.g., dancer-stage) relations might affect associative recognition, however. Using event-related potentials (ERPs), we addressed this question by manipulating the type of semantic link between paired words in an associative recognition memory experiment. An early midfrontal old/new effect, typically linked to familiarity, was observed across the relation types. In contrast, a robust left parietal old/new effect was found in the categorical condition only, suggesting a clear contribution of recollection to associative recognition for this kind of pairs. One interpretation of this pattern is that familiarity was sufficiently diagnostic for associative recognition of thematic relations, which could result from the integrative nature of the thematic relatedness compared to the similarity-based nature of categorical pairs. The present study suggests that the extent to which recollection and familiarity are involved in associative recognition is at least in part determined by the properties of semantic relations between the paired associates.

[1]  L. Squire,et al.  Episodic memory, semantic memory, and amnesia , 1998, Hippocampus.

[2]  John P. Aggleton,et al.  Interleaving brain systems for episodic and recognition memory , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  Tilo Kircher,et al.  How Different Types of Conceptual Relations Modulate Brain Activation during Semantic Priming , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  T. Curran Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[5]  Regine Bader,et al.  Multiple ways to the prior occurrence of an event: An electrophysiological dissociation of experimental and conceptually driven familiarity in recognition memory , 2010, Brain Research.

[6]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[7]  J. Grose-Fifer,et al.  Evidence for a New Conceptualization of Semantic Representation in the Left and Right Cerebral Hemispheres , 2004, Cortex.

[8]  Hiroki R. Hayama,et al.  Electrophysiological dissociation of the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity , 2006, Brain Research.

[9]  A. Yonelinas The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[10]  Mark C. W. van Rossum,et al.  Investigating the functional interaction between semantic and episodic memory: Convergent behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for the role of familiarity , 2007, NeuroImage.

[11]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  J. Kihlstrom,et al.  Associative and Categorical Relations in the Associative Memory Illusion , 2005, Psychological science.

[13]  T. Penney,et al.  Event related brain potentials and illusory memories: the effects of differential encoding. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[14]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory , 1998, Nature.

[15]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Semantic processing and memory for attended and unattended words in dichotic listening: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  M. Naveh-Benjamin,et al.  Adult age differences in episodic memory: further support for an associative-deficit hypothesis. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  G. Murphy,et al.  Thematic relations in adults' concepts. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  Pierre Mounoud,et al.  Contribution of the priming paradigm to the understanding of the conceptual developmental shift from 5 to 9 years of age. , 2009, Developmental science.

[19]  Rachel A Diana,et al.  The effects of unitization on familiarity-based source memory: testing a behavioral prediction derived from neuroimaging data. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  K. Norman,et al.  Effect of unitization on associative recognition in amnesia , 2007, Hippocampus.

[21]  A. Mecklinger,et al.  Intra- and Inter-Item Associations Doubly Dissociate the Electrophysiological Correlates of Familiarity and Recollection , 2006, Neuron.

[22]  M. Imai,et al.  Scope of linguistic influence: does a classifier system alter object concepts? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  M. Verfaellie,et al.  The contribution of familiarity to associative memory in amnesia , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  G. Murphy,et al.  Causes of taxonomic sorting by adults: A test of the thematic-to-taxonomic shift , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  A P Yonelinas,et al.  Recognition memory for faces: When familiarity supports associative recognition judgments , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  Miriam Bassok,et al.  What Makes a Man Similar to a Tie? Stimulus Compatibility with Comparison and Integration , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  What factors underlie associative and categorical memory illusions? The roles of backward associative strength and interitem connectivity. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  Daryl B. Greenfield,et al.  Young Children's Preference for Complementary Pairs: Evidence against a Shift to a Taxonomic Preference. , 1986 .

[29]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  Judgments of semantic and episodic relatedness: Common time-course and failure of segregation , 1991 .

[30]  M. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and recognition memory , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  E. Maylor,et al.  Integrative and semantic relations equally alleviate age-related associative memory deficits. , 2012, Psychology and aging.

[32]  Ken A. Paller,et al.  Remembering and knowing: Electrophysiological distinctions at encoding but not retrieval , 2009, NeuroImage.

[33]  K. Henke A model for memory systems based on processing modes rather than consciousness , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[34]  Kelly S. Giovanello,et al.  Neural correlates of familiarity-based associative retrieval , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Similar and Different: The Differentiation of Basic-Level Categories , 1997 .

[36]  F. Craik Levels of processing: Past, present... and future? , 2002, Memory.

[37]  L. Jacoby A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory , 1991 .

[38]  S. Holm A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[39]  Z. Estes,et al.  Integrative priming occurs rapidly and uncontrollably during lexical processing. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[40]  Regine Bader,et al.  The FN400 is functionally distinct from the N400 , 2012, NeuroImage.

[41]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[42]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  FN400 potentials are functionally identical to N400 potentials and reflect semantic processing during recognition testing. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[43]  James A. Hampton Concepts and Prototypes , 2000 .

[44]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[45]  J. Knott,et al.  Regarding the American Electroencephalographic Society guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature: a commentary on the proposal to change the 10-20 electrode designators. , 1993, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[46]  David I. Donaldson,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for the influence of unitization on the processes engaged during episodic retrieval: Enhancing familiarity based remembering , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[47]  Bertram Opitz,et al.  Contribution of Familiarity and Recollection to Associative Recognition Memory: Insights from Event-related Potentials , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  A. Mecklinger,et al.  Episodic memory storage and retrieval: Insights from electrophysiological measures , 2007 .

[49]  Johan Hellman,et al.  Familiarity or Conceptual Priming: Event-related Potentials in Name Recognition , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  G. Mandler Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. , 1980 .

[51]  E. Rosch Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. , 1975 .

[52]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[53]  Patric Meyer,et al.  Recognition memory for one-trial-unitized word pairs: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2010, NeuroImage.

[54]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[55]  Axel Mecklinger,et al.  An Electrophysiological Test of Directed Forgetting: The Role of Retrieval Inhibition , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[56]  E. Tulving Episodic memory: from mind to brain. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[57]  J R Hodges,et al.  Episodic memory: insights from semantic dementia. , 2001, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[58]  M. Rugg,et al.  Recognition memory for new associations: electrophysiological evidence for the role of recollection , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[59]  Mary Hare,et al.  Activating event knowledge , 2009, Cognition.

[60]  David I. Donaldson,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for the effect of interactive imagery on episodic memory: Encouraging familiarity for non-unitized stimuli during associative recognition , 2008, NeuroImage.

[61]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[62]  M. Bar Visual objects in context , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[63]  D. Schacter,et al.  Unitization and grouping mediate dissociations in memory for new associations. , 1989 .

[64]  Axel Mecklinger,et al.  Electrophysiological Measures of Familiarity Memory , 2006, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[65]  S. Krach,et al.  Taxonomic and thematic categories: Neural correlates of categorization in an auditory-to-visual priming task using fMRI , 2009, Brain Research.

[66]  William E. Hockley,et al.  Familiarity and recollection in item and associative recognition , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[67]  M. Rugg,et al.  Human recognition memory: a cognitive neuroscience perspective , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[68]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Accessing Different Types of Lexical Semantic Information: Evidence From Priming , 1995 .

[69]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400 , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[70]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Pictorial encoding reduces false recognition of semantic associates , 1997 .

[71]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Suppressing False Recognition in Younger and Older Adults: The Distinctiveness Heuristic ☆ ☆☆ ★ , 1999 .

[72]  E. Tulving Memory and consciousness. , 1985 .

[73]  Z. Estes,et al.  Thematic thinking : the apprehension and consequences of thematic relations , 2011 .

[74]  A. Mecklinger,et al.  Interfacing mind and brain: a neurocognitive model of recognition memory. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[75]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  Validating neural correlates of familiarity , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[76]  M. Koivisto,et al.  Cognitive representations underlying the N400 priming effect. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[77]  A. Yonelinas,et al.  Recollection and familiarity: Examining controversial assumptions and new directions , 2010, Hippocampus.

[78]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  The Processing Nature of the N400: Evidence from Masked Priming , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[79]  L. Light,et al.  Discriminating Semantic from Episodic Relatedness in Young and Older Adults , 2009, Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition.

[80]  E Donchin,et al.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.