Communication networks: social environments for receiving and signalling behaviour

Abstract Communication and social behaviour are inextricably linked, with communication mediating important social behaviours such as resource defence and mate attraction. However, the social environment in which communication occurs is often ignored in discussions of communication behaviour. We argue that networks of several individuals are the common social environment for communication behaviour. The consequences for receivers and signallers of communicating in a network environment are the main subjects of this review. Eavesdropping is a receiving behaviour that is only possible in the environment of a network and therefore we concentrate on this behaviour. The main effect of communication networks on signallers is to create competition with other signallers for receiver attention. We discuss the consequences of such competition. To conclude, we explore the role of signals and signalling interactions as sources of information that animals exploit to direct their behaviour.

[1]  C. Magnhagen.  Predation risk as a cost of reproduction. , 1991, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[2]  M. Naguib.  Effects of song overlapping and alternating on nocturnally singing nightingales , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  Peter K. McGregor,et al.  Know thine enemy: fighting fish gather information from observing conspecific interactions , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  M. Naguib,et al.  Effects of dyadic vocal interactions on other conspecific receivers in nightingales , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  P. Marler,et al.  Audience effects on alarm calling in chickens (Gallus gallus). , 1988, Journal of comparative psychology.

[6]  Peter K. McGregor,et al.  Signalling in Territorial Systems: A Context for Individual Identification, Ranging and Eavesdropping , 1993 .

[7]  Susan M. Smith.  Extra-Pair Copulations in Black-Capped Chickadees: the Role of the Female , 1988 .

[8]  M. Sandell.  Female aggression and the maintenance of monogamy: female behaviour predicts male mating status in European starlings , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  Andrew C. Mason,et al.  High ultrasonic and tremulation signals in neotropical katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) , 1994 .

[10]  D. R. GRIFFIN,et al.  Lack of Ultrasonic Components in the Flight Noise of Owls , 1962, Nature.

[11]  K. Wells,et al.  Vocal Communication in a Neotropical Treefrog, Hyla Ebraccata: Aggressive Calls , 1984 .

[12]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Synchronous and Alternating Choruses in Insects and Anurans: Common Mechanisms and Diverse Functions , 1994 .

[13]  A. Zahavi,et al.  Ritualization and the Evolution of Movement Signals , 1980 .

[14]  J. Staddon,et al.  Transitive inference formation in pigeons. , 1991 .

[15]  Bart Kempenaers,et al.  Extrapair paternity in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus) : female choice, male charateristics, and offspring quality , 1997 .

[16]  J. Lifjeld,et al.  Polygyny in Birds: The Role of Competition between Females for Male Parental Care , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[17]  L. Real,et al.  Toward a cognitive ecology. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[18]  J. Krebs,et al.  An introduction to behavioural ecology , 1981 .

[19]  J. C. Bremond,et al.  Recherches sur la sémantique et les éléments vecteurs d’information dans les signaux acoustiques du rouge-gorge (Erithacus Rubecula L.) , 1968, La Terre et La Vie, Revue d'Histoire naturelle.

[20]  Scott K. Sakaluk,et al.  Gecko phonotaxis to cricket calling song: A case of satellite predation , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  M. Simpson.  The Display of the Siamese Fighting Fish, Betta splendens , 1968 .

[22]  Rui F. Oliveira,et al.  Claw size, waving display and female choice in the european fiddler crab, Uca tangeri , 1998 .

[23]  Maynard J. Smith,et al.  Animal Signals: Models and Terminology , 1995 .

[24]  David A. Enstrom,et al.  Mate choice based on static versus dynamic secondary sexual traits in the dark-eyed junco , 1999 .

[25]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Sexual coercion in animal societies , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[26]  R. Seyfarth,et al.  Male parental care, female choice and the effect of an audience in vervet monkeys , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  D. Bird,et al.  Copulatory behaviour and paternity in the American kestrel: the adaptive significance of frequent copulations , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  K. Hollis,et al.  The biological function of Pavlovian conditioning: the best defense is a good offense. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[29]  Alberto Leon-Garcia,et al.  Communication Networks , 2000 .

[30]  Braithwaite,et al.  Cognitive ecology: a field of substance? , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[31]  C. Evans.  Display vigour and subsequent fight performance in the siamese fighting fish, betta splendens , 1985, Behavioural Processes.

[32]  PIERRE JOUVENTIN,et al.  Finding a parent in a king penguin colony: the acoustic system of individual recognition , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[33]  T. Székely,et al.  Aggression among female lapwings, Vanellus vanellus , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[34]  O. Hasson.  Knowledge, Information, Biases and Signal Assemblages , 2000 .

[35]  L. H.,et al.  Communication Networks , 1936, Nature.

[36]  P. Stoddard,et al.  Song-type matching in the song sparrow , 1992 .

[37]  J. Beaugrand,et al.  Coherent use of information by hens observing their former dominant defeating or being defeated by a stranger , 1996, Behavioural Processes.

[38]  Yikweon Jang,et al.  Mechanisms of selective attention in grasshopper choruses: who listens to whom? , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[39]  P. Marler,et al.  Food calling and audience effects in male chickens, Gallus gallus: their relationships to food availability, courtship and social facilitation , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[40]  M. Hauser.  The Evolution of Communication , 1996 .

[41]  Peter K. McGregor,et al.  The signal value of matched singing in great tits: evidence from interactive playback experiments , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[42]  P. McGregor,et al.  Is the signal value of overlapping different from that of alternating during matched singing in Great Tits , 1996 .

[43]  Thierry Aubin,et al.  Cocktail–party effect in king penguin colonies , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[44]  M. Dawkins.  Unravelling animal behaviour , 1986 .

[45]  R. J. Robertson,et al.  Nest usurpation and female competition for breeding opportunities by tree swallows , 1985 .

[46]  M. K. Tourtellot,et al.  Precedence effects and the evolution of chorusing , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[47]  Neville Passmore,et al.  Synchronized courtship in fiddler crabs , 1998, Nature.

[48]  A Zahavi,et al.  The fallacy of conventional signalling. , 1993, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[49]  T. Amundsen,et al.  Paternity and paternity assurance behaviour in the bluethroat, Luscinias.svecica , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[50]  R. Seyfarth,et al.  Vervet monkey alarm calls: Manipulation through shared information? , 1985 .

[51]  Tf Voogd,et al.  Animal Cognition in Nature , 1998 .

[52]  J. Epplen,et al.  Extrapair paternity in the great tit (Parus major): a test of the “good genes” hypothesis , 1998 .

[53]  T. Grafe.  A function of synchronous chorusing and a novel female preference shift in an anuran , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[54]  G. Hill.  Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality , 1991, Nature.

[55]  D. Dunham,et al.  Consequences of hyper-aggressiveness in Siamese fighting fish: cheaters seldom prospered , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[56]  Ivan D. Chase,et al.  The sequential analysis of aggressive acts during hierarchy formation: an application of the ‘jigsaw puzzle’ approach , 1985, Animal Behaviour.

[57]  M. Naguib,et al.  Nightingales respond more strongly to vocal leaders of simulated dyadic interactions , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[58]  R. Johnstone,et al.  CONSPIRATORIAL WHISPERS AND CONSPICUOUS DISPLAYS: GAMES OF SIGNAL DETECTION , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[59]  P. Marler,et al.  Vocal communication in the domestic chicken: II. Is a sender sensitive to the presence and nature of a receiver? , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[60]  Daniel Otte,et al.  Effects and Functions in the Evolution of Signaling Systems , 1974 .

[61]  T. Guilford,et al.  Design of an intention signal in the bluehead wrasse (Thalassoma bifasciatum) , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[62]  R. Alisauskas,et al.  Forced copulation results in few extrapair fertilizations in Ross’s and lesser snow geese , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[63]  J. Johnsson,et al.  Watch and learn: preview of the fighting ability of opponents alters contest behaviour in rainbow trout , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[64]  R. Wagner.  Evidence That Female Razorbills Control Extra-Pair Copulations , 1991 .

[65]  A. Møller,et al.  Sperm competition in birds : evolutionary causes and consequences , 1992 .

[66]  P. McGregor,et al.  The signal function of overlapping singing in male robins , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[67]  Torben Dabelsteen,et al.  INTERACTIVE PLAYBACK: A FINELY TUNED RESPONSE , 1992 .

[68]  G. Klump,et al.  Auditory sensitivity in the great tit: perception of signals in the presence and absence of noise , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[69]  J. Endler.  Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems. , 1993, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[70]  K. Lorenz,et al.  King Solomon's Ring , 1949 .

[71]  Henrik G. Smith,et al.  Female aggression in the European starling during the breeding season , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[72]  A. Zahavi.  Why Shouting? , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[73]  Peter K. McGregor,et al.  QUIET SONG IN SONG BIRDS: AN OVERLOOKED PHENOMENON , 1998 .

[74]  P. Marler,et al.  Avian alarm calling: Is there an audience effect? , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[75]  T. Guilford,et al.  Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[76]  P. Sale,et al.  Sexual Discrimination in the Siamese Fighting Fish (Betta Splendens Regan) , 1975 .

[77]  Ken Otter,et al.  Do female great tits (Parus major) assess males by eavesdropping? A field study using interactive song playback , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.