Patient satisfaction survey of mandibular two-implant-retained overdentures in a predoctoral program.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM In response to the Commission of Dental Accreditation (CODA) mandate of a competency in the "replacement of teeth including fixed, removable and implant" prostheses, a predoctoral implant curriculum was implemented at New York University College of Dentistry. The assessment of the success or failure of a program should include an assessment of patient satisfaction with the treatment received in the predoctoral clinics. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to measure patient satisfaction with the mandibular 2-implant-retained overdenture therapy received in the predoctoral program at New York University College of Dentistry. MATERIAL AND METHODS A telephone survey of patients who received an implant-retained overdenture in the predoctoral clinics at New York University, College of Dentistry (n=101) was conducted. Two of the authors contacted patients for participation in the survey and, using a prepared script, asked about their satisfaction with items such as function, comfort, and esthetics in addition to their overall satisfaction with the treatment they received. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. RESULTS The study revealed that 79% of participants were satisfied with their masticatory ability, 84% were satisfied with the comfort of the prosthesis, and 89% were satisfied with the esthetics of their new prosthesis. Additionally, 85% of participants reported satisfaction with the overall treatment experience, and 90% would recommend that a friend receive the same treatment. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study support the incorporation of treatment with an implant-retained mandibular overdenture as part of the routine care provided in the predoctoral education program to meet the mandates of CODA.

[1]  D. Felton Edentulism and comorbid factors. , 2009, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[2]  Judith A. Hall,et al.  What patients like about their medical care and how often they are asked: a meta-analysis of the satisfaction literature. , 1988, Social science & medicine.

[3]  Stanley Presser,et al.  Changes in Telephone Survey Nonresponse over the Past Quarter Century , 2005 .

[4]  J Lindström,et al.  Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. , 1969, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[5]  E. Berg Acceptance of full dentures. , 1993, International dental journal.

[6]  L. Jahangiri,et al.  A model for an integrated predoctoral implant curriculum: implementation and outcomes. , 2008, Journal of dental education.

[7]  J. M. Thomason,et al.  The impact of falling rates of edentulism. , 2004 .

[8]  M. Awad,et al.  Measuring patient satisfaction with mandibular prostheses. , 1998, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[9]  F Sutter,et al.  The reactions of bone, connective tissue, and epithelium to endosteal implants with titanium-sprayed surfaces. , 1981, Journal of maxillofacial surgery.

[10]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Surveys of patient satisfaction: II--Designing a questionnaire and conducting a survey. , 1991, BMJ.

[11]  G. Chard International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health , 2004 .

[12]  Michael A. Dimock,et al.  Gauging the Impact of Growing Nonresponse on Estimates from a National RDD Telephone Survey , 2006 .

[13]  G. Carlsson,et al.  Critical review of some dogmas in prosthodontics. , 2009, Journal of prosthodontic research.

[14]  M. V. van’t Hof,et al.  Two-center clinical trial of implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus complete dentures-chewing ability. , 1996, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[15]  T D Taylor,et al.  The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. , 2002, Gerodontology.

[16]  N. Garrett,et al.  Effects of improvements of poorly fitting dentures and new dentures on patient satisfaction. , 1996, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[17]  R. Butler,et al.  Population aging and health , 1997, BMJ.

[18]  G E Carlsson,et al.  The future of complete dentures in oral rehabilitation. A critical review. , 2010, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[19]  G. Heydecke,et al.  Relationship between prosthodontic evaluation and patient ratings of mandibular conventional and implant prostheses. , 2003, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[20]  P. Petersen,et al.  Improving the oral health of older people: the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. , 2005, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[21]  F. Pink,et al.  Implant dentistry in predoctoral education: the elective approach. , 2002, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[22]  M. Garraway,et al.  Can different patient satisfaction survey methods yield consistent results? Comparison of three surveys , 1996, BMJ.

[23]  D. Davis The shift in the therapeutic paradigm: osseointegration. , 1998, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[24]  C. Scully,et al.  Oral Health in America: A Report of the Surgeon General , 2000, Journal of the California Dental Association.

[25]  G. Carlsson,et al.  Implant Overdentures: The Standard of Care for Edentulous Patients , 2003 .

[26]  George A. Zarb,et al.  Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry , 1985 .

[27]  R. Mericske-Stern,et al.  Treatment outcomes with implant-supported overdentures: clinical considerations. , 1998, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[28]  C. Douglass,et al.  Will there be a need for complete dentures in the United States in 2020? , 2002, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[29]  P. Branemark,et al.  Intra-Osseous Anchorage of Dental Prostheses , 1970, Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

[30]  D. Locker Patient-based assessment of the outcomes of implant therapy: a review of the literature. , 1998, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[31]  K. Ikebe,et al.  Association of masticatory performance with age, posterior occlusal contacts, occlusal force, and salivary flow in older adults. , 2006, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[32]  J. P. Lund,et al.  Can general dentists produce successful implant overdentures with minimal training? , 2006, Journal of dentistry.

[33]  Sham Soman,et al.  Masticatory performance and efficiency in denture wearers , 1964 .

[34]  Ignace Naert,et al.  The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. , 2003, Quintessence international.

[35]  E. Zibrowski,et al.  Implant overdentures: dental students' performance in fabrication, denture quality, and patient satisfaction. , 2010, Journal of dental education.

[36]  J. Feine,et al.  Measuring patient-based outcomes: is treatment satisfaction associated with oral health-related quality of life? , 2012, Journal of dentistry.

[37]  G. Carlsson,et al.  Trends and prognoses of dental status in the Swedish population: analysis based on interviews in 1975 to 1997 by Statistics Sweden , 2000, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[38]  W. Marcenes,et al.  Oral health and nutrition in older people. , 2000, Journal of public health dentistry.

[39]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Surveys of patients satisfaction: I--Important general considerations. , 1991, BMJ.