Environmental Efficiency Evaluation of China Based on a Kind of Congestion and Undesirable Output Coefficient

The production “congestion” phenomenon is widespread in reality although few models nowadays consider its influences. In this study, production congestion is introduced into an environmental efficiency evaluation model and a new data envelopment analysis model that considers both production congestion and undesirable output is established so as to measure environmental efficiency evaluation effectively. On this basis, we divide technological change into productive technological change and energy-savings emissionreduction technological change to establish their influences on the congestion phenomenon. The results show that productive technological change cannot relieve the degree of congestion while green technology change that stimulates environmental efficiency improvement can greatly alleviate situations of congestion.

[1]  P. Aghion,et al.  The Environment and Directed Technical Change , 2009, The American economic review.

[2]  R. Färe,et al.  Measuring congestion in production , 1983 .

[3]  R. Färe,et al.  Congestion of Production Factors , 1980 .

[4]  D. Acemoglu Equilibrium Bias of Technology , 2005 .

[5]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions , 2007 .

[6]  Surender Kumar,et al.  Environmentally Sensitive Productivity Growth: A Global Analysis Using Malmquist-Luenberger Index , 2006 .

[7]  William W. Cooper,et al.  EXTENSIONS AND NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN DEA , 1996 .

[8]  W. Cooper,et al.  A unified additive model approach for evaluating inefficiency and congestion with associated measures in DEA , 2000 .

[9]  Tom-Reiel Heggedal,et al.  A Comment on the Environment and Directed Technical Change , 2012 .

[10]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Comparisons and evaluations of alternative approaches to the treatment of congestion in DEA , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Directional distance functions and slacks-based measures of efficiency , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  D. Acemoglu Labor- and Capital- Augmenting Technical Change , 2000 .

[13]  Dong-hyun Oh,et al.  A global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index , 2010 .

[14]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Nonparametric Productivity Analysis with Undesirable Outputs: Comment , 2003 .

[16]  D. Acemoglu,et al.  Transition to Clean Technology , 2014, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Chapter 1 Introduction: Extensions and new developments in DEA , 1996, Ann. Oper. Res..

[18]  Finn R. Førsund,et al.  Good Modelling of Bad Outputs: Pollution and Multiple-Output Production , 2009 .

[19]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Measuring environmental performance under different environmental DEA technologies , 2008 .

[20]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Environmental Performance : an Index Number Approach , 2004 .

[21]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Measurement of Returns to Scale and Damages to Scale for DEA-based operational and environmental assessment: How to manage desirable (good) and undesirable (bad) outputs? , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Zhongsheng Hua,et al.  Eco-efficiency analysis of paper mills along the Huai River: An extended DEA approach , 2007 .