Study of substrate energy dissipation mechanism in in-phase and anti-phase micromachined vibratory gyroscopes

This paper analyzes energy dissipation mechanisms in in-phase and anti-phase actuated micromachined z-axis vibratory gyroscopes. The type of actuation is experimentally identified as the key factor to energy dissipation. For in-phase devices, dissipation through the die substrate is the dominant energy loss mechanism. This damping mechanism depends strongly on the die attachment method; rigid attachment increases Q-factor at the cost of reduced isolation of the MEMS device from package stresses and vibrations. In contrast, anti-phase operation suppresses dissipation through the die substrate while providing immunity to external vibrations. Higher Q-factors in anti-phase devices are explained by effective subtraction of stresses applied to the substrate during vibrations. Based on the experimental investigation and the developed analytical model for energy dissipation through the die substrate, the limiting Q-factor for in-phase devices is generally below 20 thousand, while Q-factors much higher than 100 thousand can be achieved with balanced anti-phase actuated gyroscopes.

[1]  S. Sherman,et al.  Single-chip surface micromachined integrated gyroscope with 50°/h Allan deviation , 2002, IEEE J. Solid State Circuits.

[2]  J. Borenstein,et al.  Experimental study of thermoelastic damping in MEMS gyros , 2003 .

[3]  F. Ayazi,et al.  An analytical model for support loss in micromachined beam resonators with in-plane flexural vibrations , 2003 .

[4]  T. Kenny,et al.  Investigation of energy loss mechanisms in micromechanical resonators , 2003, TRANSDUCERS '03. 12th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems. Digest of Technical Papers (Cat. No.03TH8664).

[5]  Yong-Hwa Park,et al.  High-fidelity modeling of MEMS resonators. Part I. Anchor loss mechanisms through substrate , 2004, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[6]  Yong-Hwa Park,et al.  High-fidelity modeling of MEMS resonators. Part II. Coupled beam-substrate dynamics and validation , 2004, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[7]  R. Neul,et al.  New surface micromachined angular rate sensor for vehicle stabilizing systems in automotive applications , 2005, The 13th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, 2005. Digest of Technical Papers. TRANSDUCERS '05..

[8]  Brian H. Houston,et al.  A loss mechanism study of a very high Q silicon micromechanical oscillator , 2005 .

[9]  F. Ayazi,et al.  Energy Loss Mechanisms in a Bulk-Micromachined Tuning Fork Gyroscope , 2006, 2006 5th IEEE Conference on Sensors.

[10]  Tarik Bourouina,et al.  Highly decoupled single-crystal silicon resonators: an approach for the intrinsic quality factor , 2006 .

[11]  A.A. Trusov,et al.  Multi-Degree of Freedom Tuning Fork Gyroscope Demonstrating Shock Rejection , 2007, 2007 IEEE Sensors.

[12]  Minhang Bao,et al.  Squeeze film air damping in MEMS , 2007 .

[13]  Andrei M. Shkel,et al.  NEW ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN OF A TEMPERATURE ROBUST MEMS GYROSCOPE WITH IMPROVED GAIN-BANDWIDTH CHARACTERISTICS , 2008 .