On Improving the University Research Base: The Technical University of Lisbon Case in Perspective

This article examines the challenges faced by a Portuguese technical university that is striving to develop its research base within a developing science, technology and higher education system. The paper identifies lack of resources, and also organizational factors, as particular challenges. These include faculty inbreeding, career structures and related incentives as hampering factors preventing a faster development of the university research base. These factors are strongly affected by the development of the science, technology and higher education system. It is argued that these challenges can be tackled, but greater institutional autonomy is necessary as well as an increased participation of research and development in university governing bodies. It is also recognized that the different strategies for dealing with the challenges facing universities should take into account the knowledge base of the development of schools.

[1]  Barbara Sporn,et al.  Adaptive University Structures: An Analysis of Adaptation to Socioeconomic Environments of US and European Universities , 1999 .

[2]  Manuel Soler,et al.  How inbreeding affects productivity in Europe , 2001, Nature.

[3]  D. King.  The scientific impact of nations , 2004, Nature.

[4]  R. Geiger.  Research and Relevant Knowledge: American Research Universities Since World War II , 1994 .

[5]  Arcadio Navarro,et al.  High rate of inbreeding in Spanish universities , 2001, Nature.

[6]  Stephen Cole,et al.  Social Stratification in Science , 1974 .

[7]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[8]  Hugo Horta,et al.  Opening the box: comparing EU and US scientific output by scientific field , 2007 .

[9]  Gian Mario Maggio,et al.  Reply to the Commission Communication "More Research for Europe - Towards 3% of GDP" (COM(2002) 499) , 2003 .

[10]  D. Price,et al.  The Scientific Foundations of Science Policy , 1965, Nature.

[11]  Hugo Horta,et al.  Navel Gazing: Academic Inbreeding and Scientific Productivity , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[12]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  High-technology spin-offs from government R&D laboratories and research universities , 1998 .

[13]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations. , 1995 .

[14]  W. Hagstrom.  Inputs, Outputs, and the Prestige of University Science Departments , 1971 .

[15]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[16]  G. Neave.  Diversity, differentiation and the market: the debate we never had but which we ought to have done , 2000 .

[17]  R. Over,et al.  Does research productivity decline with age? , 1982 .

[18]  M. Heitor,et al.  On the role of the university in the knowledge economy , 1999 .

[19]  Réjean Landry,et al.  An econometric analysis of the effect of collaboration on academic research productivity , 1996 .

[20]  J. Enders,et al.  Careers in Overlapping Institutional Contexts: The Case of Academe. , 2004 .

[21]  R&D Funding in US Universities: From Public to Private Support or Public Policies Strengthening Diversification? , 2007 .

[22]  J. Sheehan.  Book Review - “OECD Review National Policies for Education - Review of Higher Education in Ireland Examiners’ Report” , 2005 .

[23]  Ján Figeľ.  Searching for a New Balance: The Next Frontier for Higher Education in Europe , 2006 .

[24]  David L. T. Anderson,et al.  Science Since Babylon , 1961 .

[25]  S. Hughes,et al.  The Effect of Job Mobility on Academic Salaries , 2001 .

[26]  D. Bok.  Universities in the Marketplace: The Commercialization of Higher Education , 2003 .

[27]  Judith M. Gappa.  Academic Careers for the 21st Century: More Options for new Faculty , 2002 .

[28]  J. C. Smart,et al.  Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research , 2001, Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research.

[29]  Chris M. Golde,et al.  At Cross Purposes: What the Experiences of Today's Doctoral Students Reveal about Doctoral Education. , 2001 .

[30]  Pat Bazeley,et al.  Defining 'Early Career' in Research , 2003 .

[31]  R. Nelson.  The market economy, and the scientific commons , 2004 .

[32]  D. Davis,et al.  Reputational Standing in Academe , 1987 .

[33]  Ivar Bleiklie,et al.  Modernizing Research Training-Education and Science Policy Between Profession, Discipline and Academic Institution , 2004 .

[34]  António Magalhães,et al.  On markets, autonomy and regulation the Janus Head revisited , 2001 .

[35]  Thomas A. Stewart,et al.  The Wealth of Knowledge: Intellectual Capital and the Twenty-first Century Organization , 2001 .

[36]  Towards a public policy for the research university in Portugal , 2000 .

[37]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Academic careers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital , 2005 .

[38]  Robert D. Shelton,et al.  The US-EU race for leadership of science and technology: Qualitative and quantitative indicators , 2004, Scientometrics.

[39]  C. Bland,et al.  Characteristics of the successful researcher and implications for faculty development. , 1986, Journal of medical education.

[40]  Eliot Freidson,et al.  Doctoring Together: A Study of Professional Social Control , 1976 .

[41]  Larry L. Leslie,et al.  Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University , 1997 .

[42]  Ann E. Austin.  Preparing the Next Generation of Faculty: Graduate School as Socialization to the Academic Career , 2002 .

[43]  Louise Ackers,et al.  ATTRACTING AND RETAINING ‘EARLY CAREER’ RESEARCHERS IN ENGLISH HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS1 , 2005 .

[44]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .