Improving speech audibility with wide dynamic range compression in listeners with severe sensorineural loss.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D D Dirks,et al. Speech recognition and the Articulation Index for normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[2] W A Dreschler,et al. The effect of specific compression settings on phoneme identification in hearing-impaired subjects. , 1988, Scandinavian audiology.
[3] S. DeGennaro,et al. Multichannel syllabic compression for severely impaired listeners. , 1986 .
[4] K. Grant,et al. Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing-impaired subjects: consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] R L Freyman,et al. Temporal resolution in sensorineural hearing-impaired listeners. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] H Dillon. Tutorial Compression? Yes, But for Low or High Frequencies, for Low or High Intensities, and with What Response Times? , 1996, Ear and hearing.
[7] C. Turner,et al. High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[8] E W Yund,et al. Multichannel compression hearing aids: effect of number of channels on speech discrimination in noise. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] Q Summerfield,et al. Psychoacoustic and phonetic temporal processing in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[10] D J Van Tasell,et al. Effects of single-band syllabic amplitude compression on temporal speech information in nonsense syllables and in sentences. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[11] B. Moore,et al. Syllabic compression: effective compression ratios for signals modulated at different rates. , 1992, British journal of audiology.
[12] B E Walden,et al. Description and validation of an LDL procedure designed to select SSPL90. , 1987, Ear and hearing.
[13] Selda Fikret‐Pasa. The effect of compression ratio on speech intelligibility and quality , 1994 .
[14] Dianne J. Van Tasell,et al. Hearing Loss, Speech, and Hearing Aids , 1993 .
[15] A Goedegebure,et al. Compression and its Effect on the Speech Signal , 1996, Ear and hearing.
[16] B C Moore,et al. A comparison of two-channel and single-channel compression hearing aids. , 1986, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[17] G. Studebaker. A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[18] D D Dirks,et al. Auditory filter characteristics and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[19] G Keidser,et al. Candidates for Multiple Frequency Response Characteristics , 1995, Ear and hearing.
[20] N. P. Erber,et al. Speech-envelope cues as an acoustic aid to lipreading for profoundly deaf children. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[21] I V Nábĕlek. Performance of hearing-impaired listeners under various types of amplitude compression. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[22] G. Clark,et al. Aided speech recognition abilities of adults with a severe or severe-to-profound hearing loss. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[23] P. Newall,et al. Hearing aid gain and frequency response requirements for the severely/profoundly hearing impaired. , 1990, Ear and hearing.
[24] D Byrne,et al. Selection of hearing aids for severely deaf children. , 1978, British journal of audiology.
[25] L M Hickson. Compression Amplification in Hearing Aids. , 1994, American journal of audiology.
[26] D D Dirks,et al. Articulation index predictions of contextually dependent words. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[27] A Boothroyd,et al. Amplitude compression and profound hearing loss. , 1988, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[28] B C Moore,et al. Perceptual consequences of cochlear hearing loss and their implications for the design of hearing aids. , 1996, Ear and hearing.
[29] C W Turner,et al. Quantifying the contribution of audibility to recognition of compression-amplified speech. , 1999, Ear and hearing.
[30] D Byrne,et al. Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[31] F H Bess,et al. A comparison of the benefit provided by well-fit linear hearing aids and instruments with automatic reductions of low-frequency gain. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[32] A Faulkner,et al. Residual frequency selectivity in the profoundly hearing-impaired listener. , 1990, British journal of audiology.
[33] C V Pavlovic. Speech spectrum considerations and speech intelligibility predictions in hearing aid evaluations. , 1989, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.
[34] G D Causey,et al. The relative importance of recovery time in compression hearing aids. , 1977, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[35] H. Dillon,et al. The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) New Procedure for Selecting the Gain and Frequency Response of a Hearing Aid , 1986, Ear and hearing.
[36] C W Turner,et al. Multichannel compression, temporal cues, and audibility. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[37] D D Dirks,et al. Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[38] D J Van Tasell,et al. Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[39] C W Turner,et al. Effect of single-channel compression on temporal speech information. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[40] M. Haggard,et al. Prescription of gain-setting and prognosis for use and benefit of post-aural hearing aids. , 1981, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[41] C V Pavlovic,et al. Use of the articulation index for assessing residual auditory function in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[42] L L Elliott,et al. Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[43] C W Turner,et al. Use of temporal envelope cues in speech recognition by normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.