Examining the inverted U-shaped relationship between workload and innovative work behavior: The role of work engagement and mindfulness

Is workload good or bad for employee innovation? Workload and innovative work behavior are widely studied research topics. However, the relationship between them is not well understood. As a result, there is a lack of evidence-based knowledge that could inform managers and organizations on how to boost workplace innovation in demanding work contexts. Building on the job demands–resources model, the present study posits that workload relates to innovative behavior through work engagement. Specifically, we argue that this indirect relationship exhibits an inverted U-shaped pattern in which workload is most likely to benefit innovative behavior when it is moderate. We further identify mindfulness as an important moderator that influences individuals’ ability to manage stress. In support of these predictions, three studies – a two-wave time-lagged study of 160 employees from various Canadian firms, a three-wave time-lagged study of 153 employees from US firms, and a two-wave panel study of 208 employees from US firms – found work engagement mediated the inverted U-shaped relationship between workload and innovative behavior. Moreover, when mindfulness was high, intermediate levels of workload were associated with increased innovative behavior through enhanced work engagement (Studies 1 and 2). We discuss the implications of these findings for theory and practice.

[1]  Eean R. Crawford,et al.  Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: a theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.

[2]  Sandra Ohly,et al.  Time Pressure Promotes Work Engagement Test of Illegitimate Tasks as Boundary Condition , 2015 .

[3]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[4]  Charles S. Carver,et al.  Cognitive interference and the structure of behavior. , 1996 .

[5]  A. Bakker.  The work-related flow inventory: Construction and initial validation of the WOLF , 2008 .

[6]  J. Dawson.  Moderation in Management Research: What, Why, When, and How , 2014 .

[7]  Eean R. Crawford,et al.  JOB ENGAGEMENT: ANTECEDENTS AND EFFECTS ON JOB PERFORMANCE , 2010 .

[8]  R. Baer.  Mindfulness Training as a Clinical Intervention: A Conceptual and Empirical Review , 2003 .

[9]  Michael A. West,et al.  Changing work environments: Innovative coping responses to occupational stress. , 1994 .

[10]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Multivariate Behavioral Research Quantifying and Testing Indirect Effects in Simple Mediation Models When the Constituent Paths Are Nonlinear , 2022 .

[11]  K. Leung,et al.  Curvilinear relationships between role stress and innovative performance: Moderating effects of perceived support for innovation , 2011 .

[12]  C. Fisher,et al.  Using experience sampling methodology in organizational behavior. , 2012 .

[13]  Matthijs Baas,et al.  Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: toward a dual pathway to creativity model. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  J. Bono,et al.  MINDFULNESS AT WORK , 2011 .

[15]  Michael Frese,et al.  The affective shift model of work engagement. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[16]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  Burnout: Testing for the Validity, Replication, and Invariance of Causal Structure Across Elementary, Intermediate, and Secondary Teachers , 1994 .

[17]  Jing Zhou,et al.  Research on Workplace Creativity: A Review and Redirection , 2014 .

[18]  N. Jimmieson,et al.  Self-Determination as a Moderator of Demands and Control: Implications for Employee Strain and Engagement. , 2010 .

[19]  Natalie J. Shook,et al.  Looking Up , 2011 .

[20]  K. M. Bartol,et al.  Linking Empowering Leadership and Employee Creativity: The Influence of Psychological Empowerment, Intrinsic Motivation, and Creative Process Engagement , 2010 .

[21]  R. Blonk,et al.  The role of career competencies in the Job Demands: Resources model , 2013 .

[22]  A. Bakker,et al.  Job Demands–Resources Theory: Taking Stock and Looking Forward , 2017, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[23]  S. Weisberg.  Applied Linear Regression: Weisberg/Applied Linear Regression 3e , 2005 .

[24]  J. Stuart Bunderson,et al.  The Call of the Wild: Zookeepers, Callings, and the Double-edged Sword of Deeply Meaningful Work , 2009 .

[25]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[26]  A. Bakker,et al.  The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach , 2002 .

[27]  Jing Zhou,et al.  When perceived innovation job requirement increases employee innovative behavior: A sensemaking perspective , 2017 .

[28]  A. Bakker,et al.  Accumulative job demands and support for strength use: Fine-tuning the job demands-resources model using conservation of resources theory. , 2016, Journal of Applied Psychology.

[29]  Joseph A. Cote,et al.  Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Reality or artifact? , 1989 .

[30]  M. Patterson,et al.  The role of weekly high‐activated positive mood, context, and personality in innovative work behavior: A multilevel and interactional model , 2014 .

[31]  Gene M. Alarcon,et al.  A meta-analytic examination of the potential correlates and consequences of workload , 2015 .

[32]  Onne Janssen.  Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour , 2000 .

[33]  Christopher J. Lyddy,et al.  Contemplating Mindfulness at Work , 2016 .

[34]  Neil Anderson,et al.  A Dialectic Perspective on Innovation: Conflicting Demands, Multiple Pathways, and Ambidexterity , 2009, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[35]  Marjo-Riitta Parzefall,et al.  A Review of Employee Well-Being and Innovativeness: An Opportunity for a Mutual Benefit , 2007 .

[36]  Hubert S. Feild,et al.  Has the Inverted-U Theory of Stress and Job Performance Had a Fair Test? , 2003 .

[37]  A. Bakker,et al.  The Role of Personal Resources in the Job Demands-Resources Model , 2007 .

[38]  J. House.  Work stress and social support , 1981 .

[39]  T. Little,et al.  To Parcel or Not to Parcel: Exploring the Question, Weighing the Merits , 2002 .

[40]  Mo Wang,et al.  Eating Your Feelings? Testing a Model of Employees’ Work-Related Stressors, Sleep Quality, and Unhealthy Eating , 2017, The Journal of applied psychology.

[41]  F. Chacón,et al.  Volunteer Engagement: Does Engagement Predict the Degree of Satisfaction among New Volunteers and the Commitment of Those who have been Active Longer? , 2012 .

[42]  Anis Khedhaouria,et al.  Time pressure and team member creativity within R&D projects: The role of learning orientation and knowledge sourcing , 2017 .

[43]  Toon W. Taris,et al.  A multigroup analysis of the job demands-resources model in four home care organizations , 2003 .

[44]  L. Lachance,et al.  Evaluation of a Brief Mindfulness-Based Intervention to Reduce Psychological Distress in the Workplace , 2015 .

[45]  Vincent Rousseau,et al.  Flow experience and team performance: The role of team goal commitment and information exchange , 2014 .

[46]  Toon W. Taris,et al.  A Critical Review of the Job Demands-Resources Model: Implications for Improving Work and Health , 2014 .

[47]  A. Bakker,et al.  Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi‐sample study , 2004 .

[48]  F. Anseel,et al.  Mindfulness, authentic functioning, and work engagement: A growth modeling approach , 2013 .

[49]  P. Montague,et al.  Interoception Drives Increased Rational Decision-Making in Meditators Playing the Ultimatum Game , 2011, Front. Neurosci..

[50]  Nathan P. Podsakoff,et al.  A Meta-Analytic Test of the Challenge Stressor–Hindrance Stressor Framework: An Explanation for Inconsistent Relationships Among Stressors and Performance , 2005 .

[51]  Stephanie A. Miloslavic,et al.  Relationships of role stressors with organizational citizenship behavior: a meta-analysis. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[52]  Jennica R. Webster,et al.  Toward a Better Understanding of the Effects of Hindrance and Challenge Stressors on Work Behavior , 2010 .

[53]  Onne Janssen.  Fairness perceptions as a moderator in the curvilinear relationships between job demands, and job performance and job satisfaction , 2001 .

[54]  M. Hammond,et al.  Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. , 2011 .

[55]  Onne Janssen,et al.  How fairness perceptions make innovative behavior more or less stressful , 2004 .

[56]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  Understanding The Curvilinear Relationships between LMX Differentiation and Team Coordination and Performance , 2016 .

[57]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[58]  C. Vandenberghe,et al.  Perceived organizational support, emotional exhaustion, and turnover: The moderating role of negative affectivity. , 2016 .

[59]  J. Astin,et al.  Mechanisms of mindfulness. , 2006, Journal of clinical psychology.

[60]  Huo-Tsan Chang,et al.  Psychological contracts and innovative behavior: a moderated path analysis of work engagement and job resources , 2013 .

[61]  N. Farb,et al.  The Mindfulness-to-Meaning Theory: Extensions, Applications, and Challenges at the Attention–Appraisal–Emotion Interface , 2015 .

[62]  Sigal G. Barsade.  The Ripple Effect: Emotional Contagion and its Influence on Group Behavior , 2002 .

[63]  J. Halbesleben,et al.  Conservation of Resources in the Organizational Context: The Reality of Resources and Their Consequences , 2018 .

[64]  R. Ryan,et al.  The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[65]  Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben,et al.  A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout, demands, resources, and consequences. , 2010 .

[66]  A. Acquisti,et al.  Beyond the Turk: Alternative Platforms for Crowdsourcing Behavioral Research , 2016 .

[67]  J. Halbesleben.  Handbook of stress and burnout in health care , 2008 .

[68]  Karim Mignonac,et al.  Assessing longitudinal change of and dynamic relationships among role stressors, job attitudes, turnover intention, and well-being in neophyte newcomers , 2011 .

[69]  Willem Verbeke,et al.  Using the job demands‐resources model to predict burnout and performance , 2004 .

[70]  Arnold B. Bakker,et al.  Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers , 2010 .

[71]  G. Giorgi,et al.  A Conservation of Resources Perspective on Negative Affect and Innovative Work Behaviour: the Role of Affect Activation and Mindfulness , 2018 .

[72]  Upasna A. Agarwal,et al.  Linking LMX, innovative work behaviour and turnover intentions , 2012 .

[73]  Bradley J. Brummel,et al.  Examining workplace mindfulness and its relations to job performance and turnover intention , 2014 .

[74]  Michael T. Sliter,et al.  Amazon Mechanical Turk in Organizational Psychology: An Evaluation and Practical Recommendations , 2017 .

[75]  N. Kawakami,et al.  The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. , 1998, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[76]  Michael Christian,et al.  WORK ENGAGEMENT: A QUANTITATIVE REVIEW AND TEST OF ITS RELATIONS WITH TASK AND CONTEXTUAL PERFORMANCE , 2011 .

[77]  C. Shalley,et al.  A Little Creativity Goes a Long Way: An Examination of Teams’ Engagement in Creative Processes , 2004 .

[78]  Samuel Todd Hunter,et al.  Planning for Innovation: A Process Oriented Perspective , 2012 .

[79]  Donald G. Gardner,et al.  Activation Theory and Task Design: An Empirical Test of Several New Predictions , 1986 .

[80]  A. Bakker,et al.  The Measurement of Work Engagement With a Short Questionnaire , 2006 .

[81]  J. M. Cortina,et al.  Twilight of Dawn or of Evening? A Century of Research Methods in the Journal of Applied Psychology , 2017, The Journal of applied psychology.

[82]  Mary E. Zellmer-Bruhn,et al.  Introducing Team Mindfulness and Considering its Safeguard Role Against Conflict Transformation and Social Undermining , 2017 .

[83]  E. Demerouti,et al.  Regulatory focus at work : the moderating role of regulatory focus in the job demands-resources model , 2010 .

[84]  A. Bakker,et al.  Burnout and job performance: the moderating role of selection, optimization, and compensation strategies. , 2014, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[85]  Y. Fried,et al.  A META-ANALYSIS OF WORK DEMAND STRESSORS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: EXAMINING MAIN AND MODERATING EFFECTS , 2008 .

[86]  M. Mumford,et al.  Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships , 2002 .

[87]  K. Leung,et al.  When Does Supervisor Support Encourage Innovative Behavior? Opposite Moderating Effects of General Self-Efficacy and Internal Locus of Control , 2016 .

[88]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  The Flexible Correction Model: The Role of Naive Theories of Bias in Bias Correction , 1997 .

[89]  Cynthia D. Fisherl.  Boredom at Work: A Neglected Concept , 1993 .

[90]  Marcie A. Cavanaugh,et al.  An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. managers. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.