An SAO-based text mining approach to building a technology tree for technology planning

A technology tree (TechTree) is a branching diagram that expresses relationships among product components, technologies, or functions of a technology in a specific technology area. A TechTree identifies strategic core technologies and is a useful tool to support decision making in a given market environment for organizations with specified capabilities. However, existing TechTrees generally overemphasize qualitative and expert-dependent knowledge rather than incorporating quantitative and objective information. In addition, the traditional process of developing a TechTree requires vast amounts of information, which costs considerably in terms of time, and cannot provide integrated information from a variety of technological perspectives simultaneously. To remedy these problems, this research presents a text mining approach based on Subject-Action-Object (SAO) structures; this approach develops a TechTree by extracting and analyzing SAO structures from patent documents. The extracted SAO structures are categorized by similarities, and are identified by the type of technological implications. To demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed approach, we developed a TechTree regarding Proton Exchange Fuel Cell technology.

[1]  Martin G. Moehrle.  Measures for textual patent similarities: a guided way to select appropriate approaches , 2010, Scientometrics.

[2]  Piyasi Choudhury,et al.  A technology tree based VND model for identifying the top technologies in the US renewable energy industry , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.

[3]  Sungjoo Lee,et al.  Applying technology road‐maps in project selection and planning , 2008 .

[4]  George A. Miller,et al.  WordNet: A Lexical Database for English , 1995, HLT.

[5]  Michael Heiss,et al.  The technology tree concept-an evolutionary approach to technology management in a rapidly changing market , 2001, IEMC'01 Proceedings. Change Management and the New Industrial Revolution. IEMC-2001 (Cat. No.01CH37286).

[6]  Gaetano Cascini,et al.  Measuring patent similarity by comparing inventions functional trees , 2008, IFIP CAI.

[7]  Philip Resnik,et al.  Semantic Similarity in a Taxonomy: An Information-Based Measure and its Application to Problems of Ambiguity in Natural Language , 1999, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[8]  Simon Szykman,et al.  A functional basis for engineering design: Reconciling and evolving previous efforts , 2002 .

[9]  Yuen-Hsien Tseng,et al.  Text mining techniques for patent analysis , 2007, Inf. Process. Manag..

[10]  Sandra Müller,et al.  Patent-Based Inventor Profiles as a Basis for Human Resource Decisions in Research and Development , 2005 .

[11]  Kwangsoo Kim,et al.  Ontological functional modeling of technology for reusability , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[12]  Thomas Durand,et al.  Dual technological trees: Assessing the intensity and strategic significance of technological change , 1992 .

[13]  Byungun Yoon,et al.  A text-mining-based patent network: Analytical tool for high-technology trend , 2004 .

[14]  Marco Guglielmi,et al.  The technology management process at the European space agency , 2010 .

[15]  Gianfranco Visentin.  The ESA A & R technology R & D plan 2007-2009 : serving European future missions , 2007 .

[16]  Robert Phaal,et al.  Morphology Analysis for Technology Roadmapping: Application of Text Mining , 2007 .

[17]  Gaetano Cascini,et al.  Natural Language Processing of Patents and Technical Documentation , 2004, Document Analysis Systems.

[18]  Christian Sternitzke,et al.  Similarity measures for document mapping: A comparative study on the level of an individual scientist , 2007, Scientometrics.

[19]  Hugo Liu,et al.  ConceptNet — A Practical Commonsense Reasoning Tool-Kit , 2004 .

[20]  Se Ho Cheong.  MOT by using scientific methodology in Samsung R&D , 2006, 2006 Technology Management for the Global Future - PICMET 2006 Conference.

[21]  J. MacQueen.  Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations , 1967 .

[22]  Kwangsoo Kim,et al.  TrendPerceptor: A property-function based technology intelligence system for identifying technology trends from patents , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[23]  Glenn Carroll,et al.  Taggers for Parsers , 1996, Artif. Intell..

[24]  Martin G. Moehrle,et al.  Evaluating the Risk of Patent Infringement by Means of Semantic Patent Analysis: The Case of DNA Chips , 2008 .

[25]  J. S. Aude,et al.  A Design Rule Database System to Support Technology-Adaptable Applications , 1986, DAC 1986.

[26]  Liang Chen,et al.  A Patent Document Retrieval System Addressing Both Semantic and Syntactic Properties , 2003, ACL 2003.

[27]  Robert Buderi,et al.  Funding Central Research , 2000 .