Validity of spatial models of arsenic concentrations in private well water.

OBJECTIVE Arsenic is a pervasive contaminant in underground aquifers worldwide, yet documentation of health effects associated with low-to-moderate concentrations (<100microg/L) has been stymied by uncertainties in assessing long-term exposure. A critical component of assessing exposure to arsenic in drinking water is the development of models for predicting arsenic concentrations in private well water in the past; however, these models are seldom validated. The objective of this paper is to validate alternative spatial models of arsenic concentrations in private well water in southeastern Michigan. METHODS From 1993 to 2002, the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality analyzed arsenic concentrations in water from 6050 private wells. This dataset was used to develop several spatial models of arsenic concentrations in well water: proxy wells based on nearest-neighbor relationships, averages across geographic regions, and geostatistically derived estimates based on spatial correlation and geologic factors. Output from these models was validated using arsenic concentrations measured in 371 private wells from 2003 to 2006. RESULTS The geostatisical model and nearest-neighbor approach outperformed the models based on geographic averages. The geostatistical model produced the highest degree of correlation using continuous data (Pearson's r=0.61; Spearman's rank rho=0.46) while the nearest-neighbor approach produced the strongest correlation (kappa(weighted)=0.58) using an a priori categorization of arsenic concentrations (<5, 5-9.99, 10-19.99, > or = 20microg/L). When the maximum contaminant level was used as a cut-off in a two-category classification (<10, > or =10microg/L), the nearest-neighbor approach and geostatistical model had similar values for sensitivity (0.62-0.63), specificity (0.80), negative predictive value (0.85), positive predictive value (0.53), and percent agreement (75%). DISCUSSION This validation study reveals that geostatistical modeling and nearest-neighbor approaches are effective spatial models for predicting arsenic concentrations in private well water. Further validation analyses in other regions are necessary to indicate how widely these findings may be generalized.

[1]  M. Lai,et al.  Increased prevalence of hypertension and long-term arsenic exposure. , 1995, Hypertension.

[2]  C. Dunn,et al.  The Spatial Pattern of Risk from Arsenic Poisoning: A Bangladesh Case Study , 2003, Journal of environmental science and health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering.

[3]  M. Szklo,et al.  Epidemiology: Beyond the Basics , 1999 .

[4]  P. Goovaerts,et al.  Geostatistical modeling of the spatial variability of arsenic in groundwater of southeast Michigan , 2005 .

[5]  Thomas J. Smith,et al.  Arsenic methylation and bladder cancer risk in Taiwan , 2003, Cancer Causes & Control.

[6]  A. Smith,et al.  The temporal stability of arsenic concentrations in well water in western Nevada. , 2005, Environmental research.

[7]  W. Tseng Effects and dose-response relationships of skin cancer and blackfoot disease with arsenic , 1977, Environmental health perspectives.

[8]  P. Smedley,et al.  A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters , 2002 .

[9]  P. Goovaerts,et al.  Individual lifetime exposure to inorganic arsenic using a space–time information system , 2007, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[10]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1993 .

[11]  G. Christakos,et al.  An Application of the Holistochastic Human Exposure Methodology to Naturally Occurring Arsenic in Bangladesh Drinking Water , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[12]  M. Karagas,et al.  Arsenic Occurrence in New Hampshire Drinking Water , 1999 .

[13]  M. Vahter,et al.  Arsenic Exposure and Age- and Sex-Specific Risk for Skin Lesions: A Population-Based Case–Referent Study in Bangladesh , 2006, Environmental health perspectives.

[14]  Y. Hsueh,et al.  Ingested arsenic, cigarette smoking, and lung cancer risk: a follow-up study in arseniasis-endemic areas in Taiwan. , 2004, JAMA.

[15]  Zhongqi Cheng,et al.  Water Manganese Exposure and Children’s Intellectual Function in Araihazar, Bangladesh , 2004, Environmental health perspectives.

[16]  M. Slotnick,et al.  Validity of human nails as a biomarker of arsenic and selenium exposure: A review. , 2006, Environmental research.

[17]  Myoung-Jin Kim,et al.  Arsenic species and chemistry in groundwater of southeast Michigan. , 2002, Environmental pollution.

[18]  C. Chen,et al.  Dose-response relationship between prevalence of cerebrovascular disease and ingested inorganic arsenic. , 1997, Stroke.

[19]  J. Meliker,et al.  Effects of time and point-of-use devices on arsenic levels in Southeastern Michigan drinking water, USA. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[20]  Winfried Schröder,et al.  GIS, geostatistics, metadata banking, and tree-based models for data analysis and mapping in environmental monitoring and epidemiology. , 2006, International journal of medical microbiology : IJMM.

[21]  K. Ahmed,et al.  Limited temporal variability of arsenic concentrations in 20 wells monitored for 3 years in Araihazar, Bangladesh. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  Craig Steinmaus,et al.  Case-control study of bladder cancer and drinking water arsenic in the western United States. , 2003, American journal of epidemiology.

[23]  D. Silverman,et al.  Modeling the probability of arsenic in groundwater in New England as a tool for exposure assessment. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  W. Willett,et al.  Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. , 1985, American journal of epidemiology.

[25]  M. Bates,et al.  Case-control study of bladder cancer and exposure to arsenic in Argentina. , 2004, American journal of epidemiology.

[26]  V. Burley,et al.  Food-frequency questionnaires: a review of their design, validation and utilisation , 2004, Nutrition Research Reviews.

[27]  S. Haack,et al.  Arsenic concentration and selected geochemical characteristics for ground water and aquifer materials in southeastern Michigan , 2000 .

[28]  Chun-Yuh Yang,et al.  Arsenic in drinking water and adverse pregnancy outcome in an arseniasis-endemic area in northeastern Taiwan. , 2003, Environmental research.

[29]  I Hertz-Picciotto,et al.  Chronic arsenic exposure and risk of infant mortality in two areas of Chile. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.

[30]  J. Balmes,et al.  Bronchiectasis in Persons With Skin Lesions Resulting From Arsenic in Drinking Water , 2005, Epidemiology.

[31]  S. Islam,et al.  Groundwater dynamics and arsenic contamination in Bangladesh , 2006 .

[32]  M. A. Hoque,et al.  A transect of groundwater and sediment properties in Araihazar, Bangladesh: Further evidence of decoupling between As and Fe mobilization , 2006 .

[33]  Roelof Versteeg,et al.  Spatial variability of arsenic in 6000 tube wells in a 25 km2 area of Bangladesh , 2003 .

[34]  M. Rahman,et al.  Diabetes mellitus associated with arsenic exposure in Bangladesh. , 1998, American journal of epidemiology.