Collective Behavior and Team Performance

Modern complex systems require effective team performance, yet the question of which factors determine effective teams remains to be answered. Group researchers suggest that collective or interdependent behavior is a critical component of team interaction. Furthermore, anecdotal evidence suggests that some team members are less collectively oriented than others and that the tendency to ignore task inputs from others is one factor that contributes to poor team performance. In this study we develop a procedure for differentiating collectively oriented versus egocentric team members. Experimental results confirm that collectively oriented team members were more likely to attend to the task inputs of other team members and to improve their performance during team interaction than were egocentric team members.

[1]  M. E. Shaw A comparison of individuals and small groups in the rational solution of complex problems. , 1932 .

[2]  H. B. English Resolving social conflicts. , 1949 .

[3]  D. E. Green Group Research. , 1954, Science.

[4]  E. Thomas Effects of Facilitative Role Interdependence on Group Functioning , 1957 .

[5]  J. Lanzetta,et al.  The Relationship between Certain Group Process Variables and Group Problem-Solving Efficiency , 1960 .

[6]  F. Allport A structuronomic conception of behavior: individual and collective. I. Structural theory and the master problem of social psychology. , 1962, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[7]  R. Golembiewski The small group: An analysis of research concepts and operations. , 1963 .

[8]  L. R. Hoffman Group Problem Solving1 , 1965 .

[9]  J. H. Davis Individual-group problem solving, subject preference, and problem type. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  R. Kirk Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[11]  M. E. Shaw Group dynamics : the psychology of small group behavior , 1971 .

[12]  E. Ramsden Group Process and Productivity , 1973 .

[13]  J. Hackman,et al.  Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration , 1975 .

[14]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations , 1976 .

[15]  E. Sampson Psychology and the American ideal. , 1977 .

[16]  D. Herold Improving the Performance Effectiveness of Groups Through a Task-Contingent Selection of Intervention Strategies , 1978 .

[17]  H C Foushee,et al.  The role of communications, socio-psychological, and personality factors in the maintenance of crew coordination. , 1982, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[18]  J. Driskell Personal Characteristics and Performance Expectations , 1982 .

[19]  G. W. Hill Group versus individual performance: are n + 1 heads better than one?" psychological bulletin , 1982 .

[20]  B. Meeker Cooperative Orientation, Trust, and Reciprocity , 1984 .

[21]  H. Foushee,et al.  Dyads and triads at 35,000 feet: Factors affecting group process and aircrew performance , 1984 .

[22]  Ivan D. Steiner,et al.  Paradigms and Groups , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[23]  E. Salas,et al.  Personality and group performance. , 1987 .

[24]  Robert L. Helmreich,et al.  Group interaction and flight crew performance , 1988 .

[25]  E. Salas,et al.  Group Decision Making Under Stress , 1991 .

[26]  James C. King,et al.  Group Problem-Solving , 1988, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. 2nd Ed..