Reproducibility of mean nuclear volume and correlation with mean nuclear area in breast cancer: an investigation of various sampling schemes.

[1]  M. Ladekarl,et al.  Prognostic, quantitative histopathologic variables in lobular carcinoma of the breast , 1993, Cancer.

[2]  J. Peterse,et al.  Reproducibility of mitosis counting in 2,469 breast cancer specimens: results from the Multicenter Morphometric Mammary Carcinoma Project. , 1992, Human pathology.

[3]  V. Kosma,et al.  Prognostic factors in axillary lymph node-negative (pN-) breast carcinomas. , 1991, European journal of cancer.

[4]  O. Mogensen,et al.  Nuclear volume and prognosis in ovarian cancer , 1991, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[5]  F. B. Sørensen.  Stereological estimation of the mean and variance of nuclear volume from vertical sections , 1991, Journal of microscopy.

[6]  P. V. van Diest,et al.  Computer assisted efficiency testing of different sampling methods for selective nuclear graphic tablet morphometry. , 1990, Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology.

[7]  F. B. Sørensen.  Objective histopathologic grading of cutaneous malignant melanomas by stereologic estimation of nuclear volume. Prediction of survival and disease-free period. , 1990, Cancer.

[8]  J. Baak,et al.  Further evaluation of the prognostic value of morphometric and flow cytometric parameters in breast‐cancer patients with long follow‐up , 1990, International journal of cancer.

[9]  P. V. van Diest,et al.  The Multicenter Morphometric Mammary Carcinoma Project (MMMCP). A nationwide prospective study on reproducibility and prognostic power of routine quantitative assessments in The Netherlands. , 1989, Pathology, research and practice.

[10]  J. Baak,et al.  The influence of fixatives and other variations in tissue processing on nuclear morphometric features. , 1989, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[11]  F. SØRensen,et al.  Stereological estimation of nuclear volume and other quantitative histopathological parameters in the prognostic evaluation of supraglottic laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma , 1989, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[12]  H. J. G. Gundersen,et al.  The new stereological tools: Disector, fractionator, nucleator and point sampled intercepts and their use in pathological research and diagnosis , 1988, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[13]  H. J. G. GUNDERSEN,et al.  Some new, simple and efficient stereological methods and their use in pathological research and diagnosis , 1988, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[14]  J. Baak,et al.  Potential clinical uses of laser scan microscopy. , 1987, Applied optics.

[15]  H. Gundersen,et al.  Stereological estimation of the volume‐weighted mean volume of arbitrary particles observed on random sections * , 1985, Journal of microscopy.

[16]  R. Østerby,et al.  Optimizing sampling efficiency of stereological studies in biology: or ‘Do more less well!‘ , 1981, Journal of microscopy.

[17]  J. Folkman,et al.  Tumor growth and neovascularization: an experimental model using the rabbit cornea. , 1974, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[18]  F. B. Sørensen,et al.  DNA level and stereologic estimates of nuclear volume in squamous cell carcinomas of the uterine cervix. A comparative study with analysis of prognostic impact , 1992, Cancer.

[19]  J. Baak.  Manual of quantitative pathology in cancer diagnosis and prognosis , 1991 .

[20]  J. Baak,et al.  The Multivariate Prognostic Index and nuclear DNA content are independent prognostic factors in primary breast cancer patients. , 1989, Cytometry.

[21]  H. Gundersen,et al.  Stereological estimates of nuclear volume correlated with histopathological grading and prognosis of bladder tumour , 1986, Virchows Archiv. B, Cell pathology including molecular pathology.