Intelligent Failure Domain Prediction in Complex Telecommunication Networks with Hybrid Rough Sets and Adaptive Neural Nets

Automated fault forecasting proactivity offers a promising closed-loop approach for conventional network failure management activities. Automated intelligent failure forcasting requires the capability to prefilter the observation data so as to remove irrelevant features or factors from multi-dimensional observation data. In this paper, we propose a new hybrid methodology of combining the rough-set logics with artificial neural networks for failure domain exploration in this complex system. Rough-set logics is the best solution to meet these requirements. It acts as a preprocessing machine to reduce the feature domain with a minimal factors sets being generated. In comparison with the conventional neural network approach, the Rough Neural Network Adaptive Information Prediction System (RNNAIPS) makes more efficient shortperiodical prediction for the failures domain of the internet. The simulation results show that the prediction accuracy and convergency are both greatly improved by applying this integration in comparison with the application using mere neural network.

[1]  Janette B. Bradley,et al.  Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation: S. HAYKIN. New York: Macmillan College (IEEE Press Book) (1994). v + 696 pp. ISBN 0-02-352761-7 , 1995 .

[2]  Mu-Chun Su,et al.  Application of neural networks in cluster analysis , 1997, 1997 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Computational Cybernetics and Simulation.

[3]  P. Lingras Rough Neural Networks , 1996 .

[4]  Z. Pawlak,et al.  Why rough sets? , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE 5th International Fuzzy Systems.

[5]  Beatrice Lazzerini,et al.  A modified fuzzy C-means algorithm for feature selection , 2000, PeachFuzz 2000. 19th International Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society - NAFIPS (Cat. No.00TH8500).

[6]  Jonny Eriksson,et al.  Feature reduction for classification of multidimensional data , 2000, Pattern Recognit..

[7]  Jeff Fortuna,et al.  Improved support vector classification using PCA and ICA feature space modification , 2004, Pattern Recognit..

[8]  Chuanyi Ji,et al.  Proactive network fault detection , 1997, Proceedings of INFOCOM '97.

[9]  Fan Zhang,et al.  A statistical approach to predictive detection , 2001, Comput. Networks.

[10]  Qiang Shen,et al.  Selecting informative features with fuzzy-rough sets and its application for complex systems monitoring , 2004, Pattern Recognit..

[11]  Keith C. C. Chan,et al.  An effective algorithm for discovering fuzzy rules in relational databases , 1998, 1998 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems Proceedings. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (Cat. No.98CH36228).

[12]  Zheng Zhang,et al.  HIDE : a Hierarchical Network Intrusion Detection System Using Statistical Preprocessing and Neural Network Classification , 2001 .

[13]  David A. Landgrebe,et al.  High dimensional feature reduction via projection pursuit , 1994, Proceedings of IGARSS '94 - 1994 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[14]  Alfred Inselberg,et al.  Parallel coordinates: a tool for visualizing multi-dimensional geometry , 1990, Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Visualization: Visualization `90.

[15]  Erkki Oja,et al.  A class of neural networks for independent component analysis , 1997, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[16]  Marie-Odile Cordier,et al.  A Decentralized Model-Based Diagnostic Tool for Complex Systems , 2002, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools.

[17]  Randolph D. Nelson,et al.  Probability, stochastic processes, and queueing theory - the mathematics of computer performance modeling , 1995 .

[18]  John R. Koza,et al.  Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. , 1995, Artificial Life.

[19]  David Haussler,et al.  What Size Net Gives Valid Generalization? , 1989, Neural Computation.