End‐users in academia: meeting the information needs of university researchers in an electronic age: Part 2 Innovative information‐accessing opportunities and the researcher: user acceptance of IT‐based information resources in academia

This paper is the second part of a two‐part paper, which examines the transition to the electronic information era in academia. Seeks to establish from the published literature to what extent university researchers have accepted, and adapted to, the changes wrought in information activity by seemingly endless technological developments. Within the wider context of the impact of the changing information environment on each of the three clearly discernible components of academic research (the creation of knowledge and standards, the preservation of information, and the communication of knowledge and information to others), disciplinary‐rooted differences in the conduct of research and their influence on information needs are identified, and the resulting inter‐ and intra‐individual variations in researchers’ information seeking behaviour are explored. Reviewing a large number of studies investigating the integration of electronic media into academic work, an attempt is made to paint the picture of academics’ progressively harnessing the new technologies to scholarly information gathering endeavours, with the expressed hope of affording some insight into the directions and basic trends characterising the information activity of university faculty in an increasingly electronic environment.

[1]  Joan B. Fiscella,et al.  An Approach To Assessing Faculty Use of Locally Loaded Databases , 1995 .

[2]  Carolyn O. Frost Faculty Use of Subject Searching in Card and Online Catalogs. , 1987 .

[3]  Jack Meadows,et al.  Perceptions of Electronic Journals in British Universities , 1998 .

[4]  Alan E. Bayer,et al.  Effects of online bibliographic searching on scientists' information style , 1981 .

[5]  Judith A. Adams,et al.  Electronic Information Technologies and Resources: Use by University Faculty and Faculty Preferences for Related Library Services , 1995 .

[6]  Mary B. Folster A Study of the Use of Information Sources by Social Science Researchers. , 1989 .

[7]  David E. Crawford Meeting Scholarly Information Needs in an Automated Environment: A Humanist's Perspective , 1986 .

[8]  Donald O. Case,et al.  University faculty use of computerized databases: An assessment of needs and resources. , 1985 .

[9]  Eileen G. Abels,et al.  Factors that influence the use of electronic networks by science and engineering faculty at small institutions: part I: queries , 1996 .

[10]  Rob Kling,et al.  Organizational dimensions of effective digital library use: closed rational and open natural systems models , 1996 .

[11]  Ken Eason,et al.  Patterns of use of electronic journals , 2000, J. Documentation.

[12]  Tona Henderson,et al.  Electronic Collections and Wired Faculty , 1997, Libr. Trends.

[13]  Lynn Silipigni Connaway,et al.  University faculty and networked information: results of a survey , 1997 .